Archive for July, 2014

July 31, 2014

 No 716 “EN MI OPINIóN” jUEVESS, JULIO 31, 2014‏‏‏

 “IN GOD WE TRUS”   Lázaro R González Miño,  Editor. 

barack hussein obama

Es la  calamidad más terrible que le ha podido ocurrir a los Estados Unidos de América. Nada en su historia ha sido peor que este personaje.

carlós Giménez

Nunca debió ser alcalde del condado Miami-Dade. Es inconcebible la tendencia suicida de los pueblos, permitiendo que los políticos se burlen de los que representan. Toda esta metralla política” que nos desgobierna ha saqueado las arcas del dinero público, se han burlado de los contribuyentes pidiéndoles 12 mil millones para arreglar escuelas que nunca han sido arregladas, decenas de millones para el Jackson que recauda muchísimo dinero de las personas que atienden, han hecho un túnel en la bahía que es absolutamente una basura y que ni siquiera hace falta. Han saqueado las arcas para hacer una reparación del acueducto que producirá un desfalco de más de 30 mil millones entregado a compañías que han hecho una enorme cantidad de porquerías, han creado un monstruo que se llama MXD que todos los días les pone un toll en cualquier parte y que en cualquier momento se los pone en su propio inodoro donde te defecas o en alguna parte de su esposa para que no puedas hacer el amor con ella si no pagas por el SonPass. Es que somos todos anormales que permitimos que nos hagan todas estas desfachateces? Ya dimos un ejemplo sacando al alcalducho Carlos Alvarez este es la oportunidad de sacar otra escoria de la administracio del condado. Fuera el alcalde carlos gimenes.

“EMO”                          Lazaro R Gonzalez Mino

 

Boehner Just Got What He Needed To Make Obama’s Life Miserable

“I feel a keen responsibility…”

  1. CHRISTOPHER AGEE

proposal announced earlier this month by House Speaker John Boehner received overwhelming Republican support Wednesday in a vote that authorizes Congress to file a lawsuit against Barack Obama.

Ads by ClickForSAleAd Options

Although not a single Democrat voted for the resolution, it passed by vote of 225 to 201. As NBC News reported, the legislation does not require the support of the Democrat-controlled Senate. That fact did not stop Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid from weighing in on the development via Twitter.

Prior to the House vote, Obama called the initiative a “political stunt.”

Before presenting the measure for a vote, Boehner explained that his motivation is not based on partisanship.

“This isn’t about Republicans and Democrats,” he said, “it’s about defending the Constitution that we swore an oath to uphold.”

Boehner, who has publicly rejected calls for impeachment proceeding from many within his own party, has indicated that he believes this suit is the appropriate legislative step toward holding Obama accountable for unconstitutional use of executive power.

  1. Paul Ryan, who does not feel Obama’s actions have risen to the impeachment threshold, has been a vocal supporterof Boehner’s plan. Even some who might otherwise favor impeachment have expressed concernthat the Democrat Party would seize on any such proposal as a way to rally financial support ahead of the upcoming midterm elections.

Nevertheless, some Democrats in the House CONTINUE to assert that the suit might be a step in that direction.

“’Impeachment is off the table,’” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi stated prior to Wednesday’s vote. “Why hasn’t the speaker said that? Why are there those in your caucus who won’t deny that that is a possible end in sight for this ill-fated legislation?”

Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz released a statement defending his vote and the overall intent of the lawsuit.

“I feel a KEEN responsibility to preserve and maintain the balance of power laid out in the Constitution,” he asserted. “Ultimately, if successful, this action will restrain excesses by future presidents of both parties and restore the checks and balances that were so carefully constructed by this nation’s Founding Fathers.”Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/house-votes-go-forward-obama-lawsuit/#wvZ1IH1Q1ZWSSm3R.99

 

 

This Multi-Million Dollar Scandal Is So Big That It Could Destroy The Clintons For Good

“These documents are a bombshell…”

  1. CHRISTOPHER AGEE— 

Already facing a number of setbacks in her fledgling campaign for the 2016 Democrat presidential nomination, Hillary Clinton is now at the center of a new scandal. According to recently released documents from the Department of State, Bill Clinton used his wife’s position as secretary of state to secure numerous lucrative speaking engagements around the globe.

Ads by ClickForSAleAd Options

As the Washington Examiner reports, a Judicial Watch investigation is now looking into the unethical nature of such an arrangement and the Obama administration’s perceived complicity in allowing it to CONTINUE.

“These documents are a bombshell,” said Tom Fitton, the organization’s president, “and show how the Clintons turned the State Department into a racket to line their own pockets.”

In total, the Washington Examiner indicatedthat  Clinton delivered 215 speeches abroad, taking in a staggering $48 million during his wife’s term as secretary of state.

“That former President Clinton trotted the globe collecting huge speaking fees while his wife presided over U.S. foreign policy is an outrage,” Fitton asserted.

While Hillary Clinton headed U.S. foreign RELATIONS with many of the same countries, Fitton explained that her husband brought home tens of millions of dollars by delivering speeches abroad. Judicial Watch issued a list including many of the nations – along with wide-ranging corporate sponsors that made the former president’s speeches possible. “Mr. Clinton’s speeches included appearances in China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, United Arab Emirates, Central America, Europe, Turkey, Thailand, Taiwan, India and the Cayman Islands,” the group reported. Fitton noted that, in addition to the role of the Clintons and sponsors including Goldman Sachs and American Express, the Obama regime allowed this behavior to commence.

“How the Obama State Department waived hundreds of ethical conflicts that allowed the Clintons and their businesses to accept money from foreign entities and corporations seeking influence boggles the mind,” Fitton said.

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/clintons-face-new-scandal-involving-hillarys-stint-state-department/#VMFsTSmIW7qoc9OX.99

 

 

RICARDO SAMITIER: Hoy El New York Time Hizo Un Editorial. Defendiendo El Uso De La Mariguana… Aduciendo Lo Que Dice La “CIENCIA” Y Dice Que Es Menos Dañina Que El Alcohol Y El Tabaco… Lo Que No Dicen Es:

En La Famosa Batalla De Tanques Entre Judíos Y Egipcios…

Después De La Batalla Se Encontró MARIGUANA En Todos Los

Tanques Destruidos Por Los Judíos…

Aparentemente Los Enmariguanados

Egipcios… NO RESPONDIAN RAPIDAMENTE

Y Eran VOLADOS Por Los Tanques Judíos…

Aquí Tiene El Editorial…

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/31/opinion/what-science-says-about-marijuana.html?emc=edit_th_20140731&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=36136352&_r=0&gwh=C809AABE3B7B820147BAC2D1FA9DD4BC&gwt=pay&assetType=opinion

¿Por qué? El Gobernador de New York Cerro

El Departamento que investiga la corrupción…

¿Por Economía?  Y Para “PROTEGER” La Reinante

Corrupción de los POLITIQUEROS Y BUROCRATAS…

Sea Usted el Juez… No reelijas a Ningún Politiquero

En Miami… llevan algunos 40 años viviendo del

Mismo cuento… entre ellos SOUTO Y MARTA PEREZ

Aquí tienen la noticia:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/31/nyregion/us-attorney-warns-cuomo-on-ethics-case-.html?emc=edit_th_20140731&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=36136352&_r=0

Ya No Se Puede Decir Las Cosas Como Son…

Ayer En El programa De Fox “Los Cinco”

Se Dijo Que Una Mujer “Comprometida

Que “Tiene Sexo Con Cualquiera” Es Una

“PUTA” y Fue Refutado INMEDIATAMENTE

Por Otra En El Panel… Que considera que

Si NO COBRA NO ES PUTA” El Panelistas

PIDIÓ escusa por haberle llamado PUTA

Aunque… lo cierto es que es PUTA…

La “DECADENCIA” Esta Generalizada…

Vamos A Convertir A USA en una SODOMA

Y GOMORRA…

 Aquí tienen la noticia:

http://wonderwall.msn.com/tv/bachelorettes-andi-dorfman-called-a-slut-by-fox-news-co-host-1829248.story

Un Policía de Seattle Fue Castigado Por

Cumplir Con Las Leyes… Que Ponen En

Vigor Los POLITIQUEROS Para Ganar

POPULARIDAD y “CONTRIBUCIONES”

Los vendedores de DROGA hacen contribuciones

en CASH que no Dejan RASTRO… Por Eso Pasan

Esas LEYES… Los Politiqueros Son Despreciables

 

El Caso Es Que El Policía puso el 80% De Las Citaciones Por

Fumar Mariguana En PUBLICO… como todos sabemos los

Politiqueros de Washington State… pasaron una ley que

Se puede fumar mariguana para USO RECREASIONAL

PERO NO SE PUEDE FUMAR EN PUBLICO…

El policía… tenía otro problema como el cigarro de mariguana

Se Fuma RECREASIONALMENTE entre VARIAS PERSONAS…

No se puede determinar… a quien pertenecía el cigarro… 

Otro motivo de queja es que el 38% de los multados eran negros…

Lo cual es lógico que fumaran en las calles… pues ellos se reúnen

Mas en lugares públicos que en sus casas… que por lo regular no

Tienen las mismas facilidades que la de los blancos…

Pero AHORA ESTA ACUSADO DE RACISTA…

He aquí la NOTICIA:

http://news.msn.com/us/seattle-cop-who-issued-80-percent-of-marijuana-tickets-reassigned

¿Qué Le Pasa A Obama y Al “PACIFISTA” De Kerry?

No Han Podido Conseguir Que Los Países

Musulmanes Los Apoyen En Sus Esfuerzos

De Salvar A Los Terroristas De Hamas…

La Respuesta Es Fácil… La Mayoría De Los

Países Musulmanes Están Contra Hamas…

Aquí tienen la NOTICIA:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/31/world/middleeast/fighting-political-islam-arab-states-find-themselves-allied-with-israel.html?emc=edit_th_20140731&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=36136352&_r=0

Una Persona Que Robó $65 Millones Al Medicare Lo Condenaron

A 50 Años De cárcel En Miami…  Hoy Salió En El Herald Que Uno

De Los Cómplices Va a ser condenado a 35 años…

Los Bancos A SABIENDAS Robaron Al Pueblo $ Billones

Ayer El American Bank… Llegó A Un “ARREGLO” De

Pagar Una Multa De $1.3 BILLONES… Y Van A Seguir

Operando…

Sin Duda Tienen Que Haber Robado 50 veces Más Para

Poder PAGAR y SEGUIR OPRENADO COMO SI NADA…

Desde Luego No Nos Dicen: ¿Que Negociación Hicieron

Para No Ir A La cárcel?

Lo IRONICO es que los que perdieron sus casas los “INDENIZARON” dándoles

Un cheque entre $350.00 y $1,000.00  y el IRS… consideró ese dinero

GANANCIA y les hico pagar impuestos a los que lo RECIBIERON…

El Pueblo como SIERBOS de los politiqueros… los siguen RE-ELIGIENDOLOS…

Aquí Tienen la Noticia de la multa al de $ 1.3 BILLONES… AL Bank of América…

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/07/30/bank-of-america-ordered-to-pay-nearly-1-3-billion-in-mortgage-case/?_php=true&_type=blogs&emc=edit_au_20140730&nl=afternoonupdate&nlid=36136352&_r=0

¿POR QUÉ LOS HOMBRES SON TAN FELICES ? 

RESPUESTA DE UNA MUJER…
Porque:

-Conservan su apellido toda la vida.

-El garaje es todo suyo.

-El chocolate es algo que pueden comer sin remordimiento.

-Nunca quedan embarazados.

-Los mecánicos les dicen la verdad.
-Nunca tienen que conducir hasta la próxima estación de gasolina porque los baños no estaban limpios. 
-Las arrugas les añaden carácter.
-Las canas les agregan atractivo.

-La gente nunca les mira las tetas cuando les están hablando.
-Los zapatos nuevos no les hacen mierda los pies.

-Las conversaciones telefónicas duran 30 segundos.
-Sus mensajes telefónicos no tienen más de tres o cuatro palabras.

-Para unas vacaciones de 15 días necesitan sólo una maleta.
-Pueden abrir todos los frascos y botellas sin pedir ayuda.

– No se dan cuenta si alguien aparece en una fiesta con la misma ropa que ellos, y pueden llegar a ser  amigos.

-Se pueden comer una banana o chuparse un helado, en sitios públicos, sin que nadie les lance miradas sospechosamente lúbricas.

-Pueden ver televisión con un amigo en silencio total, durante horas, sin pensar: ¿Será que está enojado conmigo?.
-Si a alguien se le olvida invitarlo a algún lado, sigue siendo su amigo/a.

-Su culo no es un factor determinante en una entrevista de trabajo.

-Su ropa interior cuesta 3€ en pack de tres.

-Tres pares de zapatos son más que suficientes para todo el año.
-Son incapaces de verse arrugas en la ropa.

-El mismo peinado les dura años, quizás décadas.

-Sólo tienen que afeitarse la cara.

-Pueden tener juguetes toda su vida.

-Pueden llevar pantalones cortos independientemente de cómo luzcan sus piernas.

-Pueden “arreglarse” las uñas con una navajita de bolsillo.
-Pueden  dejarse el bigote sin que parezca algo antiestético.

-Pueden comprar los regalos de Navidad para 25 parientes, el 24 de diciembre, en 25 minutos.

– No tienen que preocuparse nunca de qué vamos a preparar mañana para la comida.

-No tienen que probar que son peritos al volante aunque tengan tres accidentes al año.
-Pueden aumentar tres kilos y ni se dan cuenta.

-Con panza o sin panza, siguen comiendo igual.
Y lo peor de todo…

Es que es cierto!!!.

 

NELSON HORTA REPORTA: Se inicia proyecto de REVOCATORIO contra el alcalde Carlos Giménez

No Comments

July 31st, 2014

  • Al igual que ocurrió con Carlos Álvarez, los organizadores comenzaran a recolectar firmas

MIAMI 31 DE JULIO DE 2014, nhr.com—Lo que comenzó en el 2011 como un ensayo culminó con la cesantía del entonces alcalde CARLOS Álvarez y la comisionada Natacha Seijas. Álvarez y Natacha hicieron historia en el 2011 cuando fueron revocados de sus puestos en el más grande revocatorio ocurrido en los Estados Unidos.

Sus destituciones fueron  muy bien organizada con una recogida de firmas que los llevó a un referendum revocatorio,  y que ocurrió a raíz del apoyo que le dieran a la construcción del estadio para los Miami Marlins financiados por el contribuyente en momentos en que ocurría una recesión económica.

Ahora casi cuatro años después se presenta el mismo escenario, otro revocatorio en contra del alcalde  CARLOSGiménez y en esta ocasión también, bien organizado por miembros del cuerpo de policía y bomberos.

Ayer los organizadores del revocatorio a Giménez inauguraron su página en facebook y en las primeras 10 horas sin haberse anunciado casi 1,000 personas ya habían entrado a “Recall Mayor CARLOS Giménez”.

Los organizadores del revocatorio dicen que “el alcalde Giménez ha sido un fracaso”.

Otros observadores políticos consultados anoche por NHR.com, nos dijeron que Giménez en estos momentos es vulnerable al proceso de revocatorio, “el pueblo está cansado de su política de ayudar a sus íntimos amigos, tiene en su contra el negocio con los Heat, empresa que debe aun 3.3 millones de dólares al condado”.

Los organizadores del revocatorio ya tienen una página en facebook, y están preparando una página web y están en el proceso de comenzar la recolección de firmas, según nos dijo el Capitan retirado del cuerpo de bomberos Jack García.

Además en la organización del revocatorio figuran miembro del sindicato Al Cruz y del sindicato de policía John Rivera.

Aunque se necesitan 50,000 firmas para llevar el tema a las elecciones generales de noviembre, García nos dijo que esperan recoger una cantidad que supere esa suma.

Read More

Con indignación opinan en la radio sobre la propuesta de la administración condal de regalar $75 millones a “personas influyentes”

No Comments

July 31st, 2014

  • Mientras tanto el alcalde Giménez está proponiendo reducir fondos a los comedores de ansíanos

MIAMI 31 DE JULIO DE 2014, nhr.com—El artículo publicado ayer por nelsonhortareporta.com, causó gran indignación en la radio de Miami donde fue comentado en varios programas de noticias, “Otro escándalo”, decía el titular, el alcalde CARLOS Giménez está proponiendo regalar $75 millones de dólares a personajes influyentes del Condado Miami Dade, todos millonarios, pero que tienen pequeñas empresas.

“En momentos en que se están realizando recortes y en la que tanto el departamento de bomberos como el de policía se verán afectados, el alcalde Giménez propone la otorgación de estos fondos adquiridos del aumentos al amillaramiento para beneficiar a “personas influyentes”, dijo uno de los presentadores en la radio.

Este artículo dió pie para que fuéramos alertados por lectores sobre el próximo “zarpazo” de la administración Giménez, en esta ocasión los perjudicados serán los comedores para las personas mayores, ya que en el presupuesto que ha entregado el alcalde está estipulado el recorte de un 10% de los fondos al C.B.O. (comedores).

Las personas que nos contactaron nos dijeron que quedaron “Desconcertados” cuando leyeron en NHR.com la noticia de las “regalías de la alcaldía a los millonarios”.

Preguntados algunos comisionados anoche por nelsonhortareporta.com, no quisieron comentar ya que no estaban al tanto de esto, si nos respondieron que estarían opuestos a tal medida.

Le daremos seguimiento a esta noticia y tendremos la reacción de los comedores y de los comisionados y la Presidenta de la comisión Rebeca Sosa.

“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño  

  “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

July 30, 2014

No 715 “EN MI OPINIóN” MIERCOLES, Julio 30, 2014‏‏‏.‏‏

 “IN GOD WE TRUS”   Lázaro R González Miño,  Editor. 

 AMENPER: Confusión del antisemitismo doméstico

Entiendo el antisemitismo de muchos en los Estados Unidos.

Comprendo que esto se debe a la conducta de los judíos tanto en la arena política donde son una fuerza socialista, como en los negocios donde por el amor al poder y las riquezas, muchos judíos violan todas las conductas morales que se supone que se encuentran en las doctrinas mosaicas.

Pero no es lo mismo el judío americano que el israelí que da su vida por defender el único país democrático del medio oriente.

El antisemitismo en los Estados Unidos debiera comprender la diferencia.

El siempre culpar a Israel, como el antisemitismo de la organización dupliciosa y maliciosa, mal llamada Consejo de derechos humanos (CDH) de Naciones Unidas y los académicos occidentales, europeos y domésticos, en bancarrota intelectual y moral continúan como siempre el movimiento de boicot, desinversión y sanciones a Israel.(BDS)

Todo sigue siendo tan predecible — y tan repugnante — como siempre.

Un periódico del Reino Unido Express informa que durante una sesión de “emergencia” del HRC en Ginebra — convocada a instancias de los palestinos y egipcios y boicoteado por Israel — Navi Pillay, la Alta Comisionada de la ONU para los derechos humanos, advirtió que la incursión del estado judío en Gaza será investigada por crímenes de guerra. Eso es una hipocresía descarada de un panel que incluye a violadores de los derechos humanos notorios como China, Cuba, y Rusia  y culpa a Israel en cada oportunidad.

Un periódico pone una caricatura de unos lobos judíos destrozando a Gaza. La propaganda contra Israel trata de aprovechar el sentimiento antisemítico para una batalla que no se trata de semitismo o antisemitismo pero de la lucha de la democracia contra nuestro peor enemigo que es el mundo musulmán.

La crítica de las operaciones de Israel Gaza es tan aberrante que llegan a exigir  “una proporcionalidad en guerra asimétrica” esto traducido al leguaje normal, sólo puede significar una cosa: que no hay suficientes judíos que  están siendo asesinados, si empiezan a hacer ecuaciones aritméticas sobre la cantidad de muertos entonces lo que quieren es que maten a más judíos para cuadrar la ecuación aritmética y lograr una simetría numérica.

Sólo oímos en la izquierda aullidos de rabia cuando los judíos matan a los terroristas musulmanes en defensa propia y en defensa de los civiles israelíes, ignorando las numerosas veces que  los musulmanes matan a otros musulmanes y cristianos — y no mencionan el uso de Hamas en Gaza de civiles, escuelas, hospitales y casas para proteger sus armas terroristas

Pueden tratar de ocultar lo que está a la vista pero hay una realidad evidente, los antisemitas de  Hamas y sus facilitadores en el mundo y por desgracia en el gobierno de Estados Unidos, son responsables de la situación de Gaza, no Israel, que está defendiendo su existencia.

 

RICARDO SAMITIER: Túneles en GAZA… la prensa GLOBALISTAS… no publica estas fotos…

Acaban de descubrir que muchos túneles de Hamas llegaban a casas de Israel. Fue capturado un terrorista y al obligarlo a hablar, confeso que Hamas tenía plan de atacar a Israel en la cena de Rosh  Hashana en la cual entrarían a casas y matarían a la mayor cantidad de israelíes posible.

Han descubierto una verdadera ciudad debajo de la tierra.

Vea las fotos en el link abajo.  

http://cryptome.org/2014-info/gaza-ugi/gaza-ugi.htm

 

 

AMENPER: Que acaben de abrir los ojos

Desde la época de Nixon estamos teniendo un acercamiento con la China comunista que ha sido muy beneficioso……………….Para los chinos.

Está bien en este momento que el ejército de los Estados Unidos continúe las interacciones con las fuerzas chinas porque a los enemigos se deben vigilar de cerca y estas relaciones pueden mejorar la seguridad, particularmente en el mar en las costas de Corea del Norte y China.

Pero nunca se debe dejar que  tales interacciones puedan debilitar la seguridad nacional de Estados Unidos.

Cuando se trata de China, Almirante Jonathan Greenert, jefe de operaciones navales, se preocupa más por acumulación de balística y misiles que pueden golpear blancos terrestres y marítimas y hacerlo a mayor distancia, leemos en The Washington Beacon .

Y mientras China trabaja para hacer su primer portaaviones completamente operativo y la construcción de un segundo, tiene un nuevo misil de crucero diseñado especialmente para los portaaviones de Estados Unidos.

Los Chinos ahora han pedido a los Estados Unidos una visita “amistosa” a portaaviones de Estados Unidos, donde esperan seguramente que le den una gira por el portaaviones para conocerlos mejor. El Almirante Greenert ha indicado que está abierto a la idea.

Pero la noción de algo que facilite el espionaje chino debe ser rechazada. Rotundamente.

Seguro que los chinos no invitarían a los expertos americanos a comer arroz frito con cerveza Tsingtao mientras le enseñan sus misiles. No son tan estúpidos los muy Tsingaos.

 

Escribiendo en The American Spectator, Gerald D. Skoning, un oficial de portaaviones de la era de Vietnam, sugiere el tipo de equilibrio que los líderes militares estadounidenses deben tener en relaciones con sus contrapartes chinas: “un nivel adecuado de cooperación debe ser diseñado para reducir el malentendido y evitar errores de cálculo en aguas internacionales, no para compartir tecnología, formación o planificación táctica”.

Sí, tenemos que saber quienes son  nuestros enemigos y vigilarlos de cerca. . Pero ya conocemos  a los chinos ya lo suficientemente bien como para saber que invitarlos a bordo de los portaaviones es una muy mala idea de hecho.

Esta era de conducta pacifista y colaboración con el enemigo que nos prometió el presidente Obama y que según él traería una nueva era de amistad con los pueblos y paz debiera de ser reconocida como una utopía o una traición a la nación.  
Escojan lo que crean que es, pero el resultado lo estamos viviendo, la única paz que vemos en Rusia, América Latina, África y el Medio Oriente, es la paz de los sepulcros.

 

 

RICARDO SAMITIER: ¿Cuánto estarán GASTANDO los burócratas en VIGILAR A ZIMMERMAN?

La “CARROÑA BUROCRATICA” Y Su Venganza…

Después Que Zimmerman Fue Absuelto… Sin Duda Tienen

Que Tenerlo Con Unos Detectives Chequeado Pues No Perdonan

Que Saliera Absuelto… y Se “CONSOLIDARA LEGALMENTE”

El Derecho A La Defensa De la Vida”

No pasa un  mes que no aparezca en las NOTICIAS…

SORPRENDIDO… haciendo algo que según ELLOS NO DEBÍA

Sin que NADIE LO ACUSARA o llamara a la policía.

Lo que demuestra que los SIGUEN CONSTANTEMENTE…

GASTANDO DINERO de nuestro taxes…

Esto lo envió…para que DESPIERTEN… estamos viviendo un régimen

DESPOSTICO QUE VIGILA A LOS QUE “ODIADO” por los politiqueros…

Y le cierran todas las puertas…

 

RICARDO SAMITIER:  La Hipocresía De Los Politiqueros Globalistas De USA

Ahora USA Acusa A Sus “Aliados” Europeos De Pagar A Los Terroristas Por Liberar A Sus Ciudadanos… Y Dicen Que Ellos No Pagan…

Mentira…

USA Le Ha Estado Pagando A Castro Sus “CHANTAGES”  Desde Que Les Capturo A 18 Marineros De Guantánamo En 1958…

¿Cómo Castro Logró Los Siguientes Acuerdos?

  • Camarioca y Los Vuelos De La Libertad…
  • Contra La Piratería De Naves Comerciales
  • El Mariel, Los Balseros…
  • Los 20,000 Visas Anuales…

 Por Todas Esas Razones… USA Que Desde el Gobierno Socialista

De Woodrow Wilson… Creador de la “LIGA DE LAS NACIONES”

y SOBRE TODO DE ROOSEVELT CREADOR DE LA ONU…han estado

ACTIVAMENTE financiando el “Nuevo Orden” que no es más que

Un RETORNO AL FEUDALISMO de “FAMILIAS” para gobernar al

Mundo entero… La “Familia Bush” fue la primera en decir públicamente

Que la primera guerra contra IRAK fue para crear un NUEVO ORDEN

Mundial… y ahora para darle CHANCE DE GANAR a los DEMOCRATAS

Están postulando a Jef Bush… a pesar de que NO TIENE EL MENOR

CHANCE A GANAR…

Aquí tienen la noticia en el NEW YORK TIME HOY

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/30/world/africa/ransoming-citizens-europe-becomes-al-qaedas-patron.html?emc=edit_ee_20140730&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=36136352&_r=0

 

 

RICARDO SAMITIER: El Pais,Madrid: The Brazil against Israel

The Brazil against Israel

With the withdrawal of its ambassador to protest the military offensive against Gaza, Brasilia aligns with countries that automatically defend military dictatorships and human rights violations

Andrés Oppenheimer 28 JUL 2014 – 10:43 CEST

Filed in:

Recommend on Facebook 0

Twittear 0

Send to LinkedIn 0

Send to Tuenti Send to Kindle Send to Menéame Submit to Eskup

Send Print Save

Although most countries in the world have denounced the escalation of violence in Gaza, most of the time blaming the two parties with different levels of conviction, Brazil was singled out by endorsing shades the narrative of the terrorist group Hamas , and have surpassed even countries like Egypt and Jordan in their actions against Israel.

In a statement on July 23, the government of Dilma Rousseff said, “We strongly condemn the disproportionate use of force by Israel in the Gaza Strip, which resulted in a high number of civilian casualties,” without mentioning the Hamas attacks against Israel.

He added that Brazil had decided to summon its ambassador in Israel to return to Brasilia for queries, something that even Arab countries such as Egypt and Jordan made at the time these lines were written.

The statement aligned Brazil to Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and other countries that automatically align with the military dictatorships and human rights abusers around the world. According to the Brazilian press, Brazil is now seeking a condemnation of Israel in the Mercosur meeting tomorrow in Venezuela.

Other countries, including Argentina, which normally follows the foreign policy of Brazil, condemn the disproportionate use of force by Israel, but at the same time condemn Hamas for its systematic rocket attacks against Israeli civilian targets.

After the unilateral rejection of Brazil to Israel, the country responded that the conduct of Brasilia “illustrates why this remains politically irrelevant economic and cultural giant.” Israeli officials said the draconian reaction of Israel was due to Brazil’s decision to recall its ambassador. In comparison, the U.S. and EU have started their statements emphasizing Israel’s right to defend itself.

The EU Council issued a statement on July 22 saying that “the European Union strongly condemns the indiscriminate rocket attacks by Hamas on Israel.” The statement added that “even if the EU recognizes the legitimate right of Israel to defend itself against any attack, states that Israeli military operations must be proportionate and appropriate to international humanitarian law.”

Brazil’s decision to withdraw its ambassador from Israel could have domestic political reasons, or to woo the Arab and African countries in its campaign for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, and try to get the votes from the Palestine Brasilians in the next election

My opinion: Israel can be accused of not taking more precautions to avoid civilian casualties, and the government of Netanyahu could also be accused of not doing enough to accelerate the much needed creation of a Palestinian state, but you can not blame Israel for fend off a constant rain of rockets, also how can she did that, when her father was a jew from Sofia,Bulgaria, he was the second chief of the KGB russia during the Soviet Union, that why she go along with Cuba,Venezuela,Ecuador,Uruguay,Argentina and others nations, but you most remenber she at 15 years old the head of 5 guerrilas groups,

Israel should brake diplomatic relations with Brazil.

Most Viewed In …

»Top 50

  • El País
  • Spain
  • Of America
  • From Brazil
  1. 1How the Egyptians were in bed?
  2. 2Latin America will have an exchange program for students
  3. 3Calvin and Hobbes viewed adults
  4. 4The Brazil against Israel
  5. 5¿Cómo eran los Egyptians en la cama?
  6. 6Rousseff says the letter from Santander to customers is “unacceptable”
  7. 7“I am over charged for 18 months that the São Paulo government for 20 years”
  8. 8Benjamin Netanyahu: “a just war does not exist than this”
  9. 9The fear of Ebola virus feeds the expansion in Africa
  10. 10The shade of giant

 

Watch: What Harry Reid Just Said About Israel And Hamas Will Have Obama Shaking His Fist With Rage

“Mr. President, our great country has many friends…”

JUSTIN KOSKI — 

Senator Reid took the Senate floor on Monday to call Congress to approve aid to Israel. In doing so, he stepped away from his Liberals and Democrats, who relentlessly portray Israel as the aggressor.

“Mr. President, our great country has many friends in the world, we’re proud of all the alliances we have,” Reid said. “But certainly, our deepest attachment is what we have with Israel. The United States and Israel have stood by each other in good times and bad times, in times of peace, in times of war. Right now our friends in the state of Israel are under attack. Hamas continues to indiscriminately fire thousands of rockets into Israel.”

“When Hamas fires these rockets, Hamas has no idea where they’ll land,” he CONTINUED. “Military installation, they hope; a daycare center, they don’t care; empty parking lot, they don’t care. They’re just firing these rockets indiscriminately.”

Even Sen. Reid knows that Conservatives are right on the issue of Israel. Will the President listen?
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/say-what-what-harry-reid-just-said-about-hamas-will-make-you-double-take/#4BtwJCBBv2ObpEKK.99

 

Newt Gingrich: Obama Trying to Provoke GOP to Impeach Him

 

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich eviscerated President Barack Obama’s “pathetic presidency” Tuesday, saying any executive action he might take to provoke Republicans to impeach him is aimed at helping Democrats raise money for November elections.
Speaking at an annual National Conservative Student Conference at George Washington UNIVERSITY in the nation’s capital, the CNN “Crossfire” co-host said Republicans shouldn’t take the bait, The Daily Caller reported. 
Vote Now: Do You Approve Or Disapprove of President Obama’s Job Performance? 
“There is a rumor that the president, around Labor Day, may use executive action to legalize 5 million people who are here outside the law,” Gingrich said. “And I think if they do it, it will be trying to provoke the Republicans to institute impeachment.”

Talk of the possible executive action began late last week, when Illinois Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez said he was sitting down with White House officials on the matter. 
But Gingrich warned that a retaliatory impeachment effort won’t succeed, asserting, “It’s the Democrats who want to talk about it because they raise money off of it.”
“These people are pretty desperate,” Gingrich said. “Nothing is working, and so they are looking for some fight that allows them to re-polarize the country in terms that help them in the election.
“I think we ought to laugh at them and say ‘if the best you can do after six years of the presidency is to yell impeachment and hope that you can raise money, it is a pretty pathetic presidency.’ 
“And by the way, it is a pretty pathetic presidency.”
Democrats have been able to energize their base and increase fundraising by raising the specter of impeachment. House Speaker John Boehner tried to put the notion to rest Tuesday, saying there will be no impeachment move. 
Even so, Gingrich said that if the reported move to legalize millions were attempted, “the country would go crazy if the president were to do something so stupid,” the Daily Caller reported.
Gingrich told the gathering that the right way for the GOP to combat any such executive action would be to pass a bill in the House declaring it illegal, putting Democrats in the Senate in a tough spot.
“Democrats running for re-election even in seats that look like they’re not in trouble would be in trouble overnight,” he theorized.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/Newt-Gingrich-impeachment-Obama-immigration/2014/07/29/id/585632#ixzz38xSN45ze 
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

 

“EMO” CUALQUIER CIUDADANO QUE VOTE EN LAS PROXIMAS ELECCIONES POR CUALQUIERA DE ESTOS INMORALES EJEMPLARES DEL DESCARO, DELINCUENCIA  Y LA INMORALIDAD, TIENE QUE ESTAR LOCO O SER TAN CORRUPTOS COMO ELLOS: LAZARO R GONZALEZ MINO.

NELSON HORTA REPORTA:

OTRO ESCANDALO: Plan de “regalías” a empresarios poderosos, está siendo rechazado por comisionados

• Alcalde Carlos Giménez quiere usar $75 millones para dar concesiones a 6 empresas de personas influyentes

MIAMI 30 DE JULIO DE 2014, nhr.com—Un esfuerzo encaminado a utilizar los impuestos a la propiedad para financiar un proyecto de subversión para empresas  pequeñas está siendo rechazado enérgicamente por los comisionados que ven las intenciones del alcalde CARLOS Giménez como de regalías a empresarios poderosos y derroche de fondos públicos.

El comisionado Juan CARLOS Zapata fue el primero en reaccionar a principio de mes, cuestionando la petición del alcalde Giménez  y liderando el Comité de Desarrollo Económico logro retrasar el proyecto.

Giménez quiere utilizar $75 millones de dólares para darle concesiones de infraestructura de $5 millones a seis empresas, incluyendo al Miami Ocean Studios, estudios de producción al norte de Miami Dade, y a una escuela de medicina con fines de lucro, entre otros.

De acuerdo con nuestras fuentes, los prestamos (grants) serian otorgados a proyectos vinculados con personas influyentes, como mejoras al Miami Design District complejo de tiendas y restaurantes muy popular y controlado por Craig Robins un coleccionista de arte y quien recibirá $1 millón de este proyecto propuesto por el alcalde Giménez.

Otra “regalía” dicen nuestras fuentes, seria entregarle $5 millones para un proyecto comercial respaldado por la Fundación de la ex congresista Carrie Meek.

Otros $5 millones irían al aeropuerto de Opa-locka, allí el alcalde le entregaría $5 millones a Orion Private-jet Terminal su propietario Leonard Abess quiere construir un moderno hangar privado, Abess en el año 2008 vendió el City National Bank of Florida por la suma de $945 millones.

Otro beneficiado seria un complejo de escuelas semi-privadas (charter) localizadas en Palmetto Bay respaldadas por Wayne Rosen uno de los mayores contribuyentes a las campañas políticas de Miami Dade, el recibirá $5 millones de dólares también.

Varios de los comisionados con que hemos hablado incluyendo al comisionado Juan CARLOS Zapatas no estarían aprobando el proyecto de la administración de Giménez.

“Estas regalías son aparentemente un pago por las contribuciones que realizan a las campañas, dijo un funcionario que nos comunicó sobre  este escándalo”.

Después del comité, el proyecto debe ser llevado ante el pleno de la comisión, “entonces veremos quién es quién”, nos dijo nuestras fuentes que nos alerto diciéndonos que, “esto será después de las elecciones de Agosto 26”.

Lo que tiene algunos comisionados indignados con este proyecto-regalías del alcalde Giménez es que “en este momento en que se amenas en que habrán recortes en el presupuesto que afectaría a los departamentos de bomberos y policías, sería una burla usar esos fondos para entregárselos a “personas influyentes y millonarios” para que realicen determinados proyectos para su beneficio.

Según la Presidenta de la comisión Rebeca Sosa , “tocar la seguridad pública es un error”, y señaló que “nosotros lo que debemos es buscar ahorros.

Read More

Encuesta apoya la deportación instantánea de los niños inmigrantes ilegales

• Una encuesta realizada por la AP-GfK deja mal parado al presidente Obama

MIAMI 30 DE JULIO DE 2014, nhr.com—Por los últimos dos meses las imágenes conmovedoras de niños inmigrantes cruzando la frontera sin sus padres o detenidos en cárceles de Texas han recorrido el mundo, sin embargo, la mayoría de los estadounidenses ahora dicen que la ley debe modificarse para que puedan ser enviados rápidamente y sin audiencia de deportación.

Una nueva encuesta de la Prensa Asociada-GfK, señala que dos tercios de americanos dicen que la inmigración ilegal es el problema más grave que tiene el país, 14 puntos más que las últimas encuestas realizadas en el mes de mayo y demuestra la preocupación de los americanos.

De acuerdo con esta encuesta, un 62 por ciento, dicen que la inmigración es un tema importante para ellos personalmente, cifra que es 10 puntos más desde el mes de marzo.

La misma encuesta demuestra que el índice de aprobación del presidente Barack Obama y su manejo del tema de inmigración han caído manteniéndose con un 31 por ciento de aprobación.

Como se sabe mas de 57,000 niños inmigrantes no acompañados han  entrado ilegalmente en el país desde octubre. La mayoría de los niños provienen de Honduras, Guatemala y El Salvador, donde la violencia de las pandillas es omnipotente, muchos buscan reunirse con sus padres ya viviendo en Estados Unidos.

Desde que inicialmente Obama señaló que “era una situación humanitaria”, el presidente ha presionado a los presidentes de Centro América para que frenen el flujo y ha solicitado al Congreso más de $3 mil millones para contratar a mas jueces de inmigración, además para construir más centros de detención y hacer el proceso de deportación más rápido para los niños.

Por un margen de 2 a 1, los estadounidenses se oponen al proceso actual en el manejo de los menores no acompañados que cruzan la frontera y que requiere que aquellos que no sean de Méjico o Canadá permanezca en Estados Unidos y reciban una audiencia con un juez de inmigración antes de ser deportados.

Preguntados a los encuestados si estaba de acuerdo en cambiar la ley para enviar sin tal audiencia a los niños, un 51 por ciento dio gran apoyo a la idea.

La encuesta de Prensa Asociada-GfK se realizo entre el 24 y 28 de julio con un grupo representativo de la población estadounidense, se uso una combinación de llamadas telefónicas y entrevistas a través del internet con 1,044 adultos con un margen de error de menos de 3 y 4 por ciento.

Los encuestados fueron seleccionados al azar utilizando un método de encuestas telefónico o correos electrónicos y más tarde fueron también entrevistados a través de la internet.

 

 

 “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño  

  “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

July 28, 2014

No 713 “EN MI OPINIóN” LUNES, Julio 28, 2014‏‏‏‎

   

“IN GOD WE TRUS”   Lázaro R González Miño, Editor. 

 “No siento pena por el hombre que trabaja demasiado si su trabajo vale la pena hacerlo. Lo admiro.

Me da pena el hombre  física y mentalmente capaz, que no trabaja. En cualquier extremo de la escala social, lo desprecio… 
― Theodore Roosevelt

 

Amenper: Los Esfumados Estados Unidos de América

 

La condición intrínseca de la persona no tiene nada que ver con la raza, el origen, la edad o el status económico.

Tiene que ver con su ética de trabajo y su responsabilidad. 

Esto no cambia si la persona es negra, pobre o rica, vieja o joven.

El considerar a una persona  inspire compasión porque es pobre, no es correcto, hay que considerar si la pobreza fue causada por algún factor válido o si fue causado por la falta de su ética de trabajo, por su vagancia.

El considerar que una persona inspira compasión porque es un pobre viejito, no es correcto, hay que considerar si durante su juventud fue una buena persona o no lo fue.  Si fue un joven hijo de puta, lo más probable es que sea un viejo hijo de puta.

El considerar que un inmigrante de un país pobre inspire compasión, no es correcto, hay que considerar cuales fueron las razones que lo hicieron abandonar el país.  Si era un delincuente en su país lo más probable es que lo sea en este.  Hay que cuidar a quien le damos entrada en nuestra casa, hay que tener la casa en orden.

Creo que todo esto es evidente e indiscutible, todo el mundo lo sabe.  Pero las políticas socialistas ven en esto una oportunidad de comprar apoyo repartiendo el dinero de los demás y avanzar su agenda.

Obama nos prometió que su gobierno sería el más transparente de la historia de los Estados Unidos.

Creo que ha cumplido su promesa.

Los Estados Unidos de hoy se están poniendo tan transparentes que ya no lo reconocemos, se están esfumando, desapareciendo poco a poco, en el horizonte de la historia.

 

Amenper: A Play of Fools

There is no contest between a successful businessperson and a socialist economist.

The idiotic centralized governments make socialists economic fools doomed to failure.. 

But when it comes to politics, the foolishness is in the capitalist shoe.

Because of a hard to understand eagerness of doing business with Cuba, we have to listen to businessmen in Washington telling us that the people  who had wanted the Soviets to drop the bomb on this country during the 1962 missile crisis—no longer presents a threat to the U.S–  No matter if the Castro’s remain as paranoid, power-hungry and pathological as ever.  They want to forget that they may be economic fools, but they run a good business making the island available to criminal governments, like Iran and North Korea.

But…no matter if the enemy of the U.S. and buddy of Obama, Vladimir Putin, the Russia’s president who is trying to rebuild the Soviet empire traveled to Cuba, where he signed agreements to lease eight Russian jets worth $650 million to Havana and proposed some $30 billion in debt forgiveness and promised more military aid. 

No matter what, we have to end the “failed” embargo and engage in doing business with Cuba.

“Fools” is a comic fable by Neil Simon, set in the small village of Kulyenchikov, Ukraine (Then Russian Territory), during the late 19th century.

When Simon wrote the fable, he could never imagined that the title and the country of the play would be so notoriously familiar years later in Washington’s politics..

Fool is, fool does, and Washington is today a play of fools.

Below you can read today’s column by Maria Anastasia O’Grady.

Good reading for us, but fools in Washington won’t read it, because it is not agreeable with their foolishness.

 

Putin Restores a Cuban Beachhead

The Kremlin and the Castros are chummy again, and Moscow is offering military aid. By  MARY ANASTASIA O’GRADY

Cuban spy Ana Belen Montes was the highest-ranking Pentagon intelligence analyst ever to be busted for working for the Castros. What’s also notable, in light of Vladimir Putin‘s visit to Havana earlier this month, is that she was nabbed in 2001, long after the Cold War ended.

Besides leaking classified material and blowing the cover of covert U.S. intelligence agents, Montes seems to have been charged by her handlers with convincing top brass in Washington that Fidel Castro —who had wanted the Soviets to drop the bomb on this country during the 1962 missile crisis—no longer presents a threat to the U.S. Montes, who rose to become the U.S. military’s resident intelligence expert on Cuba, partly accomplished that mission. The Pentagon’s 1998 Cuba threat assessment played down its military and intelligence capabilities.

The best Cuba watchers were less sanguine..

Mr. Putin’s Cuba trip reinforces the point. The old Cold War villains are up to no good one more time.

Russia’s president is trying to rebuild the Soviet empire. Eastern Europe won’t cooperate and in Asia the best he will ever be is China’s junior partner. But in Latin America Mr. Putin’s KGB résumé and willingness to stick his thumb in the eye of the U.S. gives him traction. Colonizing Cuba again is an obvious move.

Enlarge Image

 

Cuban President Raúl Castro greets Vladimir Putin in Havana, July 11. Kommersant via Getty Images

After the Soviet Union fell in 1991 and the gravy train to Havana was cut off, Fidel was furious with the Kremlin. It hasn’t been easy to get back in his good graces. In 2008 the Moscow news outlet Kommersant reported that Putin friend and Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin got the cold shoulder when he visited the island to work on “restoring full-scale cooperation.” Kommersant reported that the Castros were “displeased” that Russia had been talking up a military deployment to Cuba without Havana’s approval.

But it seems that the world’s most notorious moochers are willing to forgive—for the right price. With sugar-daddy Venezuela running into economic problems in recent years and Mr. Putin itching for a place in the Caribbean sun, Cuba has decided to deal.

In February 2013 Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev traveled to Cuba, where he signed agreements to lease eight Russian jets worth $650 million to Havana and proposed some $30 billion in debt forgiveness. Two months later, Russian Chief of Staff Gen. Valery Gerasimov visited key military and intelligence sites on the island. In August a spokesman for the Black Sea Fleet announced that the Russian guided-missile warship Moskva, the fleet’s flagship, had set off for Cuba and other ports in Central and South America.

Fast forward to February of this year. Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu announced that Russia had engaged in talks to establish military bases in Venezuela, Nicaragua and Cuba. The next day a Russian intelligence-gathering ship docked in Havana.

In May, Russia’s Security Council and Cuba’s Commission for National Security and Defense agreed in Moscow to form a joint working group. “The situation in the world is changing fast and it is dynamic. That’s why we need the ability to react promptly,” Nikolai Patrushev, secretary of the Russian Security Council, told the press. Cuban Col. Alejandro Castro Espin, son of Raúl Castro, led the Cuban delegation. In June Russia signed a space cooperation agreement with Cuba to allow it to use the island to base its Glonass (Russia’s alternative to GPS) navigation stations.

When he called in Havana this month Mr. Putin flaunted his intentions to restore a Russian beachhead in Cuba. The shootdown of the Malaysian Airlines flight on the same day that he ended his Latin American tour raised the visibility of a trip that was made for both psychological and strategic reasons. Mr. Putin wants to assure the Free World that he can be a menace in the U.S. backyard—and he wants a local foothold to make the threat real.

Mr. Putin officially wrote off $32 billion of bad Cuban debt on his trip, leaving just $3.2 billion due over the next 10 years. Russia is looking for oil in Cuban waters, and Mr. Putin signed new agreements in energy, industry and trade with Castro. Days after the visit he denied rumors that the Kremlin intends to reopen its old electronic-eavesdropping facility on the island.

That’s cold comfort, even if you believe him. Satellite technology has made land-based listening posts obsolete in many ways. Far more troubling is the emergence of Mr. Putin as a Latin American presence. Tyrants all over the region, starting with the Castros, admire his ruthlessness and skill in consolidating economic and political power. They want to emulate him. It’s a role model the region could do without.

Write to O’Grady@wsj.com

 

This Small Town Just Took A Big Stand Against Obama

Upon announcing his intention to hobnob with supporters in Medina, Wash…

  1. CHRISTOPHER AGEE— 

Barack Obama recently hit a roadblock in his ongoing campaign to attend fundraisers across the nation. Upon announcing his intention to hobnob with supporters in Medina, Wash. earlier this week, city leaders explained that they will not force local taxpayers to pay for the associated expenses of his visit.

Ads by ClickForSAleAd Options

“We love welcoming people to what we THINK is one of the most attractive communities in Puget Sound,” said City Manager Mike Sauerwein.

While visitors might be welcome, however, he insisted that it should be at their own expense.

“We just don’t feel that we should be passing the cost of the events to our citizens,” he said.

Saurwien explained that, with previous presidential visits, taxpayers have had to pony up tens of thousands of dollars to pay for added police coverage and other incidental expenses. He urged the city council to pass that expense on to Obama’s host, former Costco CEO Jim Sinegal, for this event.

Every member of Medina’s small police force will be assigned to working the fundraiser, aided by state and county law enforcement officers. While he could not estimate what the total cost would be prior to the event, Saurwein did know who would be receiving the invoice.

“We just don’t THINK that’s a cost that should be passed on to taxpayers,” he said, “so we are going to be billing the host of the event for that cost.”

As Western Journalism reported, Sinegal has been a longtime Obama supporter going back to his tenure as Costco CEO, having donated a total of $200,000 to Obama’s campaign and an affiliated political action committee ahead of the 2012 presidential election.

Sinegal was even invited to speak at the 2012 Democratic National Convention.

The company came under fire earlier this month, in part because of its close ties to Sinegal and, by extension, the Obama administration.

When conservative author Dinesh D’Souza’s recent book, “America”, was unceremoniously stripped from Costco shelves just as his corresponding documentary opened in theaters across America, many concluded that the move could have stemmed from the retailer’s inherent disdain for his anti-Obama viewpoint

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/city-just-refused-foot-bill-obamas-upcoming-visit/#AbJbV2QOWj8lUUoA.99

 

 

Amenper:  Mi madre dijo que siempre debo ser intolerante con la ignorancia pero comprendiendo al analfabetismo. Porque   personas, que no pudieron ir a la  escuela, eran más educados y más inteligente que los profesores de la Universidad.  

― Maya Angelou

Tuve la oportunidad de oír personalmente a Maya Angelou posiblemente en una de los últimos discursos que dio antes de su muerte en mayo de este año.

 Fue  en la graduación de mi nieta Sara en la universidad de Vanderbilt.

Maya era demócrata y liberal, pero de la vieja guardia.  No era comunista y era cristiana profesante. Antes a diferencia de ahora, podías tener ideas liberales sin ser comunista.

 En sus poemas y escritos nunca se vio el odio virulento y revanchista que vemos en los negros militantes de hoy en día. 

El pensamiento de arriba me hace recordar algo que me sucedió estando en el downtown de Miami con una de esas personas que se ajustan a lo que dice Maya. 

Era un amigo, mayor que yo, campesino de Cuba, amigo de mi padre.  Cuando estábamos entrando en un parqueo en la acera nos tuvimos que parar por un negrito arrogante que nos dio una mirada altiva y se tomó su tiempo para dejarnos pasar. 

Mi amigo dijo un epíteto y una exclamación que para qué mencionar aquí. 

Yo le dije, mira lo que pasa es que los negros aquí sufrieron mucho en el sur con los blancos que los tenía segregados y discriminados.  

Entonces me dijo, si pero sería a sus padres y abuelos no  este negrito hijo de puta.

Esa es la sabiduría de mi amigo campesino, que no pudo ir a la escuela pero fue más educado y más inteligente que yo en ese momento.

 

Ricardo Samitier:

Absolutely Jaw Dropping !!

 
   
 
   
 

PAUL RYAN’S PROPOSED BUDGET CUTS

 

A List of Republican Budget Cuts

Notice S.S. and the military are NOT on this list.

These are all the programs that the new Republican House has proposed cutting.

Read to the end.

* Corporation for Public Broadcasting Subsidy — $445 million annual savings.
* Save America ‘s Treasures Program — $25 million annual savings.
* International Fund for Ireland — $17 million annual savings.
* Legal Services Corporation — $420 million annual savings.
* National Endowment for the Arts — $167.5 million annual savings.
* National Endowment for the Humanities — $167.5 million annual savings.
* Hope VI Program — $250 million annual savings.
* Amtrak Subsidies — $1.565 billion annual savings.
* Eliminate duplicating education programs — H.R. 2274 (in last Congress), authored by Rep. McKeon , eliminates 68 at a savings of $1.3 billion annually.
* U..S. Trade Development Agency — $55 million annual savings.
* Woodrow Wilson Center Subsidy — $20 million annual savings.
* Cut in half funding for congressional printing and binding — $47 million annual savings.
* John C. Stennis Center Subsidy — $430,000 annual savings.
* Community Development Fund — $4.5 billion annual savings.
* Heritage Area Grants and Statutory Aid — $24 million annual savings.
* Cut Federal Travel Budget in Half — $7.5 billion annual savings
* Trim Federal Vehicle Budget by 20% — $600 million annual savings.
* Essential Air Service — $150 million annual savings.
* Technology Innovation Program — $70 million annual savings.
*Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Program — $125 million annual savings..
* Department of Energy Grants to States for Weatherization — $530 million annual savings.
* Beach Replenishment — $95 million annual savings. 
* New Starts Transit — $2 billion annual savings.

* Exchange Programs for Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, and Their Historical Trading Partners in Massachusetts — $9 million annual savings
* Intercity and High Speed Rail Grants — $2.5 billion annual savings.
* Title X Family Planning — $318 million annual savings.
* Appalachian Regional Commission — $76 million annual savings.
* Economic Development Administration — $293 million annual savings.
* Programs under the National and Community Services Act — $1.15 billion annual savings.
* Applied Research at Department of Energy — $1.27 billion annual savings.
* Freedom CAR and Fuel Partnership — $200 million annual savings..
* Energy Star Program — $52 million annual savings.
*Economic Assistance to Egypt — $250 million annually.
* U.S.Agency for International Development — $1.39 billion annual savings..
* General Assistance to District of Columbia — $210 million annual savings.
* Subsidy for Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority — $150 million annual savings.
*Presidential Campaign Fund — $775 million savings over ten years.
* No funding for federal office space acquisition — $864 million annual savings.
* End prohibitions on competitive sourcing of government services.
* Repeal the Davis-Bacon Act — More than $1 billion annually.
* IRS Direct Deposit: Require the IRS to deposit fees for some services it offers (such as processing payment plans for taxpayers) to the Treasury, instead of allowing it to remain as part of its budget — $1.8 billion savings over ten years. 
*Require collection of unpaid taxes by federal employees — $1 billion total savings. WHAT’S THIS ABOUT?
* Prohibit taxpayer funded union activities by federal employees — $1.2 billion savings over ten years.
* Sell excess federal properties the government does not make use of — $15 billion total savings.
*Eliminate death gratuity for Members of Congress. WHAT???
* Eliminate Mohair Subsidies — $1 million annual savings.
*Eliminate taxpayer subsidies to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — $12.5 million annual savings. WELL ISN’T THAT SPECIAL

* Eliminate Market Access Program — $200 million annual savings.
* USDA Sugar Program — $14 million annual savings.
* Subsidy to Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) — $93 million annual savings.
* Eliminate the National Organic Certification Cost-Share Program — $56.2 million annual savings.
*Eliminate fund for Obamacare administrative costs — $900 million savings.
* Ready to Learn TV Program — $27 million savings..
* HUD Ph.D. Program.
* Deficit Reduction Check-Off Act.
*TOTAL SAVINGS: $2.5 Trillion over Ten Years

My question is, what is all this doing in the budget in the first place?!

Maybe this is why the Democrats are attacking Paul Ryan.

Please Send to everyone you know..

 

 

Amenper: Digitalizan expedientes médicos: se ha convertido en una zafra para los ladrones.

 La nueva maravillosa idea de la administración Obama para digitalizar los registros médicos (a un costo de $ 24 billones), presenta una situación de exponer lo que antes era un privilegio entre el médico y el paciente  en una exposición de no sólo las condiciones médicas pero la información privada del social security, dirección postal, tarjeta de créditos, fecha de nacimiento y otros datos que quedan expuestas en la internet abiertas para fraude.

Los expertos de crimen cibernético dicen el peligro es inevitable.

De nuevo la administración de Obama obliga a los ciudadanos a bajarse los pantalones y enseñar el trasero

Los hackers utilizando una dirección IP chino ya se han conectado al sistema de salud de Texas, exponiendo los datos de más de 400.000 personas.

Desde 2009, con aplicación de la tecnología de información de salud económica y Clinical Health Act, más de 31 millones de estadounidenses han tenido sus registros médicos expuestos al robo o divulgación de datos personales no autorizados.

El resultado de con esta medida es una apertura al mercado negro de millones de personas. Considerando que los ladrones podrían robar dólar por un número de tarjeta de crédito robada, con un perfil de identidad completa de un expediente médico puede obtener hasta $500, dicen los expertos. Y la diferencia es que una tarjeta de crédito, puede ser cancelada, la información contenida en un expediente médico no puede ser revocada.

Dada la naturaleza del delito cibernético, es incomprensible que el mandato de los registros médicos electrónicos que crean un componente significativo de la seguridad personal pueda implementarse.  Solamente en una administración que no tiene respeto a la privacidad de los ciudadanos se puede ver una disposición como esta.

. Así que ahora salud y servicios humanos (Obamacare) tiene cobro de multas por no someterse a infracciones de seguridad. Muy reconfortante.

El portón del solar queda abierto y con este gobierno, y no se cerrará fácilmente.

 

Ricardo Samitier: MAIL OF THE YEAR
After being interviewed by the school administration, the prospective teacher said: 
“Let me see if I’ve got this right. You want me to go into that room with all those kids, correct their disruptive behaviour, observe them for signs of abuse, monitor their dress habits, censor their T-shirt messages and instil in them a love for learning. 
You want me to check their backpacks for weapons, wage war on drugs and sexually transmitted diseases, and raise their sense of self esteem and personal pride. 
You want me to teach them patriotism and good citizenship, sportsmanship and fair play,

and how to register to vote, balance a chequebook, and apply for a job. 
You want me to check their heads for lice, recognize signs of antisocial behaviour, and

ensure that they all pass their final exams.
You also want me to provide them with an equal education regardless of their handicaps,

and communicate regularly with their parents in English, Arabic or any other language,

by letter, telephone, newsletter, and report card. 
You want me to do all this with a piece of chalk, a blackboard, a bulletin board, a few

books, a big smile, and a starting salary that qualifies me for” New Start.”
You want me to do all this, and then you tell me……
I CAN’T wear a little cross or say “Merry Christmas”  because someone might take offense? “

 

Did Obama’s Biggest Nightmare Just Become Reality?

This movement could end up being bigger than the Tea Party.

FLOYD BROWN — 

PAGES: 1 2

Under Obama’s Dream Act, he declared that he wouldn’t deport underage illegal immigrants already living in the United States.

Ads by ClickForSAleAd Options

Of course, the illegal immigrants in the United States were elated by the news. Many of them phoned home requesting for friends and FAMILY to join them.

Well, hundreds of thousands answered the call and are now swarming across the border. And the surge has completely overwhelmed America’s child welfare and foster care system.

In response, Obama – believing he would face less opposition by shipping these immigrants to big cities – turned nearly the entire country into pseudo border states.

So what was once a problem in Arizona and Texas is now also a problem in Illinois, California, and New York.

INDEED, Obama’s “dream” has quickly become a nightmare. And his strongest supporters are now turning their backs on him.

Lies, Lies, Lies

The political left has claimed that these children are leaving Central America because of violence.

Ads by ClickForSAleAd Options

Don’t believe it…

A recent government intelligence assessment compiled via interviews with detained illegals concludes that 95% “cited the primary reason for migrating to the United States was the perception of U.S. IMMIGRATION LAWS granting free passes or ‘permisos’ to UAC (unaccompanied children).”

By comparison, the violence affecting black children in America’s inner cities is far worse than anything being faced by these children from Central America.

On such merits, black leaders across the country are actually denouncing Obama as a result of the ongoing immigration crisis. They believe that if Obama can find money to spend on the child immigration crisis, he should also be able to find more room in the budget for helping at-risk children who are here legally.

Speaking from Chicago, Reverend Jesse Jackson said, “If we can find $4 billion for those children – and we should – we can find $2 billion for Chicago. There are more children involved, and more have been killed, and more have been shot.”

Just over the Fourth of July weekend, nine people were killed – and 60 injured – in the ongoing eruption of violence in Chicago.

And it’s not just the BLACK COMMUNITY that’s feeling shunned. A coalition of homeless activists in Los Angeles are also upset – feeling neglected as city officials rush to find housing for illegal immigrants.

Before we start taking in “refugees” from other countries, maybe we should start focusing on the refugees in our own backyard.

Free Immigration and a Welfare State?

Many on the left CONTINUE to quote the words inscribed on the Statue of Liberty, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…”

The problem with open borders today is that the system has dramatically changed.

In 1886, when the Statue of Liberty was gifted to the United States, we had no welfare system. Immigrants knew they had to work to make it in America, and they certainly did!

Today, we have a highly developed welfare system that gives these children money we cannot afford.

As America’s brilliant economist, Milton Friedman, once postulated: “It’s just obvious you can’t have free immigration and a welfare state.” The immigrants coming today are an immediate cash drain on an already-overtaxed welfare system – shoving American children out of the way to make more room for them.

PAGES: 1 2

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamas-biggest-nightmare-just-become-reality/#Hr2HP34BuOAbAAiD.99

 

Hilarious: In Just 52 Seconds, Jimmy Kimmel Completely Humiliates Obama On National TV

“Good way to ensure that your approval rating stays in the low 40%”

JUSTIN KOSKI —

Jimmy Kimmel, on his late-night talk show “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”, discussed Obama and how his motorcade caused mayhem in LA with traffic jams, a woman prevented from delivering babies, and an overall mess.

“I feel like he only comes here for money, like a college student who comes home only to do laundry and steal from the refrigerator.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/kimmel-obama-only-comes-to-la-to-ask-for-money/#GQOCU9rTQfHVx2Ws.99

 

 

  1. Aleman: Scary Obituary In 1887 Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior:  “A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government.  A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.  From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse over loose fiscal policy, which is) always followed by a Dictatorship.””The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years.  During 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith;   From spiritual faith to great courage;   From courage to liberty;   From liberty to abundance;   From abundance to complacency;   From complacency to apathy;   From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage.”   NOTICE THAT WE ARE RIGHT ON SCHEDULE!!! The obituary follows: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA- Born 1776 – Died 2014
    R.I.P. It doesn’t hurt to read this several times.   Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the last Presidential election:

    Number of States won by
    Obama: 19
    Romney: 29

    Square miles of land won by: 
    Obama: 580,000
    Romney: 2,427,000

    Population of counties won by:
    Obama: 127 million
    Romney: 143 million

    Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
    Obama: 13.2
    Romney: 2.1

    Professor Olson adds:
    “In aggregate, the map of the territory Romney won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country. Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low Income tenements and living off various forms of government Welfare…”

    Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the “complacency and Apathy” phase of Professor Tyler’s definition of Democracy, with some forty percent of the nation’s population already having reached the “governmental dependency” phase..

    If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million Criminal invaders called illegal’s – and they vote – then we can say Goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years. If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message. If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how Much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our Freedom..

 

WATCH: This Woman Just Called Hillary Clinton A Lesbian On Live TV

And Bill Clinton may not be monogamous?

JUSTIN KOSKI — JULY 25, 2014

The View’s soon-to-be-ex-host Jenny McCarthy posed to millions of Americans that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton might be a lesbian. And Bill might have lovers on the side. Seems like McCarthy is going out with a bang.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/person-on-the-view-calls-hillary-clinton-a-lesbian-on-live-tv/#uFyX8Xkxg4axgA3t.99

 

 

Top Obama Aide Just Admitted Obama Really Could Be Impeached

…senior Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer explained…

  1. CHRISTOPHER AGEE— 

Following a pair of polls showing that a significant number of Americans support Barack Obama’s impeachment and removal from office, a high-ranking White House source expressed concern that such an effort will pick up steam. In a statement to reporters Friday, senior Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer explained that he no longer looks at impeachment as a GOP pipe dream.

“I saw a poll today that had a huge portion of the Republican Party base saying they supported impeaching the president,” he asserted.

While Pfeiffer acknowledged that many in D.C. would “laugh that off,” he took a much more realistic view of the fledgling effort among GOP leaders.

“I would not discount that possibility,” he said.

He went on to explain that House Speaker John Boehner’s plan to sue Obama for his excessive use of executive power will likely keep the issue at the forefront of many Americans’ minds.

“Speaker Boehner,” Pfeiffer said, “by going down the path of this lawsuit, has opened the door to Republicans possibly considering impeachment at some point in the future.”

He concluded that Obama’s own policy initiatives could also make the possibility of impeachment more appealing to Republican lawmakers.

“I THINK that if the president enacted immigration reform, that would certainly up the likelihood that they would contemplate impeachment,” he reasoned.

In the end, impeachment is a notion that Pfeiffer said the administration takes “very seriously,” stating that he is against the pursuit of any such measure.

“But I think it would be foolish to discount the possibility that Republicans would at least consider going down that path,” he concluded Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/revelation-proves-white-house-worried-impeachement/#Z8sPLIvdEzcgwjQM.99

 

“En mi opinión” Editor: Lázaro R González Miño  

  “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

July 25, 2014

No 712 “EN MI OPINIóN” VIERNES, Julio 25, 2014‏‏‏.‏

“IN GOD WE TRUS”   Lázaro R González Miño, Editor. 

AMENPER: ¿¿¿¿Reforma Migratoria????

No soy un experto en leyes de inmigración, pero he tenido la experiencia de haber sido un inmigrante sujeto a varias facetas de esta ley de Estados Unidos.  Primero entré con visa de turista, después más tarde entré con una visa de estudiante, tuve más tarde de nuevo que obtener una nueva visa de turista, más adelante con la llegada de la gloriosa revolución, pasé por el proceso de refugiado político siendo aceptado como “parolee” que es una palabra difícil de definir, pero que es una estancia probatoria condicional. 

Llegadas las condiciones obtuve la residencia pando por un proceso de acreditación presentando las documentaciones requeridas.  Cinco años más tarde, después de los exámenes pertinentes, los exámenes físicos y revisión mis antecedentes penales durante mi residencia, pruebas de mi conocimiento del idioma del país y sus leyes, pude obtener la ciudadanía de los Estados Unidos.

En cada instancia se requirieron documentaciones,  pruebas de que no sería carga pública a los contribuyentes, que no tenía ninguna enfermedad contagiosa que pudiera afectar a los ciudadanos, que tenía el potencial de incorporarme a la sociedad y la cultura del país, porque conocía sus leyes y mis responsabilidades ciudadanas.

Nunca pasó por mi mente que lo que me pedían era algo ofensivo a mi persona.  Yo estaba pidiendo un privilegio y era lógico que me pusieran sus condiciones.

El sistema es más adecuado y civilizado que las demás leyes migratorias por la que incidentalmente he pasado en otros países.  En república Dominicana en el aeropuerto vi un rótulo que decía “Si usted tiene el privilegio de ser Dominicano, no tiene que pagar nada, los otros tienen que pagar $100.00”.

Me pareció ofensivo, lo mismo en el Salvador, Guatemala, las Bahamas,  y Egipto. Sin rótulo pero hay un cargo por el privilegio de entrar de turista en el país, una manera un poco extraña de recibir a un turista que dicen necesitar.

Las leyes migratorias de los Estados Unidos siempre me parecieron razonables, y los oficiales de inmigración capacitados y cordiales. Entonces ¿Por qué reformar la ley que es buena?  ¿No es mejor reformar a los inmigrantes para que cumplan la ley como lo hicimos los que entramos legalmente antes que ellos? ¿Por qué arreglar lo que no está roto?  ¿Por qué en vez de reformar nuestras leyes no buscamos oficiales electos que las implementen?

Tenemos problemas migratorios porque no se implementa la actual ley de inmigración.  Pero sobre todo tenemos problemas de soberanía.  La soberanía del territorio nacional está siendo violada por extranjeros que están entrando en oleadas en el territorio de esta nación soberana.

El problema no es reformar las leyes, el problema es reformar as los políticos que nos gobiernan.

Tenemos una buena oportunidad para reformar nuestro gobierno el próximo Noviembre y después en el 2016.  Lo único que tenemos es que votar para botar.

 

 

 

M ALEMAN: PRESIDENTES QUE RECIBIERON DINERO DE VENEZUELA

LOS DOLARES DE LA DENOMINADA MAREA ROSADA. LA LISTA DE PRESIDENTES QUE RECIBIERON DINERO Y SOPORTE DEL REGIMEN DE HUGO CHAVEZ DESDE 2000.

PRESIDENTE

P A Í S

PERIODO

MONTO US$

Ricardo Lagos*

Chile

2000–2006 

3,499,211

Michelle Bachelet*

Chile

2006–2010, 2014–Pte.

11,000,000

Luiz Inácio da Silva*

Brasil

2003–2011 

19,300,000

Néstor Kirchner*

Argentina

2003–2007

72,124,000,000

Cristina Fernández*

Argentina

2007–presente 

511,128,000,000

Leonel Fernández* 

  1. Dominicana

1996–2000, 2004–2012

3,400,000

Danilo Medina* 

  1. Dominicana

2012–presente 

19,300,000

Jules Wijdenbosch

Surinam

1996-2000

 

Dési Bouterse

Surinam

2010–presente 

12,000,000

Tabaré Vázquez

Uruguay

2005–2010

 

José Mujica 

Uruguay

2010–presente 

91,000,000

Evo Morales

Bolivia

2006–presente 

420,950,000,000

Daniel Ortega

Nicaragua

1985–1990, 2007–Pte.

1,185,400,900

Rafael Correa 

Ecuador

2007–presente 

1,281,600,000

Álvaro Colom*

Guatemala

2008–2012

31,100,400

Fernando Lugo*

Paraguay

2008–2012

10,300,800

Mauricio Funes*

El Salvador

2009–2014

 

Salvador Sánchez

El Salvador

2014-presente 

11,480,100

Manuel Zelaya*

Honduras

2006–2009

683,700,010

Ollanta Humala

Perú

2011–presente

8,160,250,005

(*) 20% DE LA PRODUCCIÓN DE PDVSA POR UN PLAZO DE 20 años.
 
Sources
Economy Intelligence and Counter Terrorism Unity
16April2014

 

 

RICARDO SAMITIER: Letter from a senior gentleman in Mesa, Arizona

 

Dear Family, Friends, Neighbors and former Classmates,

I just found myself in the middle of a medical situation that made it very clear that “the affordable care act” is neither affordable, nor do they care.

 

I’ll go back about seven years ago to a fairly radical prostate surgery that I underwent. The Urologist (a personal friend) who performed the surgery was very concerned that it was cancer, though I wasn’t told this until the lab report revealed it was benign.  Since that procedure, I have experienced numerous urinary tract infections, UTI’s. Since I had never had a “UTI” prior to the prostate surgery, I assume that it is one of the side effects from surgery, an assumption since confirmed by my Family Doctor.

 

The weekend of March 8-9, I was experiencing all the symptoms of another bout of UTI. By Monday afternoon the infection had hit with full force. Knowing that all I needed was an antibiotic, I went to an Urgent Care Center in Mesa, AZ., to provide a specimen, a requirement for getting the prescription. After waiting 45 min. to see the Doctor, I started getting very nauseous and light headed.

 

I went to the Receptionist to ask where the bathroom was as I felt that I was going to throw up. I was told that I would have to wait for the Doctor because I would need to leave a specimen and they didn’t want me in the bathroom without first seeing him.

 

That was when the lights went out, my next awareness was that of finding myself on the floor (in the waiting room) having violent dry heaves, and very confused. At this point, I tried to stand up but couldn’t make it, and they made it very clear they weren’t going to let me get up until the ambulance got there. By the way, when you’re waiting to see the Doctor and you pass out, you get very prompt attention.

Now, “the rest of the story”, and the reason for sending this to so many of you.

 

I was taken to the nearest hospital, to emergency. Once there, I was transported to an emergency examination room. Once I had removed my clothes and donned one of those lovely hospital gowns, I finally got to see a Doctor. I asked “what is going on” I’m just having a UTI, just get me the proper medication and let me go home. He told me that my symptoms presented the possibility of sepsis, a potentially deadly migration of toxins, and that they needed to run several tests to determine how far the infection had migrated.

 

For the next 3 hours I was subjected to several tests, blood draws, EKG’s, and demands for specimens. At about 7:30 the nurse came back to my room to inform me that one of the tests takes 1- 2 days to complete, I asked if they (the results)could be emailed, at which point she informed me that I wouldn’t need them emailed because I wasn’t going anywhere. I started arguing with her but was told, “if you don’t start behaving, I’ll start taking your temperature rectally, at which point I became a perfect gentleman. I did tell her I wanted to see the doctor because I had no intention of staying overnight.

 

Now, this is what I want each of you to understand, please read these next sentences carefully.The doctor finally came in to inform me that he was going to admit me. I said, “are you admitting me for treatment or for observation?” He told me that I would be admitted for observation. I said Doctor, correct me if I’m wrong, but if you admit me for observation my Medicare will not pay anything, this due to the affordable care act , he said that’s right, it won’t. I then grabbed for my bag of clothing and said, then I’m going home. He said you’re really too sick to be going home, but I understand your position, this health program is going to hit seniors especially hard. 

 

The doctor then left the room and I started getting dressed, I was just getting ready to put my shoes on when another doctor (the closer) came into the room, he saw me dressed and said, “where do you think you are going?” I simply said “I’m going home, to which he replied, quite vociferously, no you aren’t.

 

I said, “Doc, you and I both know that under the “affordable care act” anyone on Medicare who is admitted to a hospital for observation will be responsible for the bill, Medicare won’t pay a cent”.  At which point he nodded in affirmation.

 

I said, “You will either admit me for a specific treatment or you won’t admit me.” Realizing he wasn’t going to win this one, he said he would prepare my release papers.

 

A few minutes later the discharge nurse came to my room to have me sign the necessary papers, relieving them from any responsibility. I told her I wasn’t trying to be obstinate, but I wasn’t going to be burdened with the full (financial) responsibility for my hospital stay.

 

After making sure the door was closed, she said, “I don’t blame you at all, I would do the same thing.”  She went on to say, “You wouldn’t believe the people who elect to leave for the same reasons, people who are deathly sick, people who have to be wheeled out on a gurney.” She further said, “The ‘Affordable Care Act’ is going to be a disaster for seniors.

 

Yet, if you are in this country illegally, and have no coverage, you will be covered in full.

 

This is not internet hype folks, this is real, I just experienced it personally.  Moving right along, this gets worse.

 

Today I went to a (required) follow up appointment with my Arizona Family Practitioner. Since my white count was pretty high, the follow up was important. During the visit I shared the experience at emergency, and that I had refused to be admitted. His response was “I don’t blame you at all, I would have done the same thing”.  He went on to say that the colonoscopy and other procedures are probably going to be dropped from coverage for those over 70.

 

I told him that I had heard that the affordable care act would no longer pay for cancer treatment for those 76 and older, is that true? His understanding is that it is true.

 

The more I hear, and experience the Affordable Care Act, the more I’m beginning to see that we seniors are nothing more than an inconvenience, and the sooner they can get rid of us the better off they’ll be.

 

November is coming folks, we can have an impact on this debacle by letting everyone in Congress know that their responsibility is to the constituents, not the president and not the lobbyists. We need to let them ALL know that they are in office to serve and to look after the BEST INTERESTS of “we the people”, their employers, and not to become self serving bureaucrats who serve only out of greed. And if they don’t seem to understand this simple logic, we’ll fire them.

 

On the mend, (signed)

 

REMEMBER:  Demand your hospital admission is for TREATMENT and NOT for OBSERVATION!

 

Please Note: Florida has a very broad Public Records Law. Most written communications to or from State and Local Officials regarding State or Local business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your email communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure.

 

 

This Small Town Just Took A Big Stand Against Obama

Upon announcing his intention to hobnob with supporters in Medina, Wash…

  1. CHRISTOPHER AGEE

Barack Obama recently hit a roadblock in his ongoing campaign to attend fundraisers across the nation. Upon announcing his intention to hobnob with supporters in Medina, Wash. earlier this week, city leaders explained that they will not force local taxpayers to pay for the associated expenses of his visit.

“We love welcoming people to what we think is one of the most attractive communities in Puget Sound,” said City Manager Mike Sauerwein.

While visitors might be welcome, however, he insisted that it should be at their own expense.

“We just don’t feel that we should be passing the cost of the events to our citizens,” he said.

Saurwien explained that, with previous presidential visits, taxpayers have had to pony up tens of thousands of dollars to pay for added police coverage and other incidental expenses. He urged the city council to pass that expense on to Obama’s host, former Costco CEO Jim Sinegal, for this event.

Every member of Medina’s small police force will be assigned to working the fundraiser, aided by state and county law enforcement officers. While he could not estimate what the total cost would be prior to the event, Saurwein did know who would be receiving the invoice.

“We just don’t think that’s a cost that should be passed on to taxpayers,” he said, “so we are going to be billing the host of the event for that cost.”

As Western Journalism reported, Sinegal has been a longtime Obama supporter going back to his tenure as Costco CEO, having donated a total of $200,000 to Obama’s campaign and an affiliated political action committee ahead of the 2012 presidential election.

Sinegal was even invited to speak at the 2012 Democratic National Convention.

The company came under fire earlier this month, in part because of its close ties to Sinegal and, by extension, the Obama administration.

When conservative author Dinesh D’Souza’s recent book, “America”, was unceremoniously stripped from Costco shelves just as his corresponding documentary opened in theaters across America, many concluded that the move could have stemmed from the retailer’s inherent disdain for his anti-Obama viewpoint.

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/city-just-refused-foot-bill-obamas-upcoming-visit/#jYJGGftsIB8H8AFB.99

 

 

 

 Did Obama’s Biggest Nightmare Just Become Reality?

This movement could end up being bigger than the Tea Party.

FLOYD BROWN — 

PAGES: 1 2

Under Obama’s Dream Act, he declared that he wouldn’t deport underage illegal immigrants already living in the United States.

Of course, the illegal immigrants in the United States were elated by the news. Many of them phoned home requesting for friends and family to join them.

Well, hundreds of thousands answered the call and are now swarming across the border. And the surge has completely overwhelmed America’s child welfare and foster care system.

In response, Obama – believing he would face less opposition by shipping these immigrants to big cities – turned nearly the entire country into pseudo border states.

So what was once a problem in Arizona and Texas is now also a problem in Illinois, California, and New York.

Indeed, Obama’s “dream” has quickly become a nightmare. And his strongest supporters are now turning their backs on him.

Lies, Lies, Lies

The political left has claimed that these children are leaving Central America because of violence.

Don’t believe it…

A recent government intelligence assessment compiled via interviews with detained illegals concludes that 95% “cited the primary reason for migrating to the United States was the perception of U.S. immigration laws granting free passes or ‘permisos’ to UAC (unaccompanied children).”

By comparison, the violence affecting black children in America’s inner cities is far worse than anything being faced by these children from Central America.

On such merits, black leaders across the country are actually denouncing Obama as a result of the ongoing immigration crisis. They believe that if Obama can find money to spend on the child immigration crisis, he should also be able to find more room in the budget for helping at-risk children who are here legally.

Speaking from Chicago, Reverend Jesse Jackson said, “If we can find $4 billion for those children – and we should – we can find $2 billion for Chicago. There are more children involved, and more have been killed, and more have been shot.”

Just over the Fourth of July weekend, nine people were killed – and 60 injured – in the ongoing eruption of violence in Chicago.

And it’s not just the black community that’s feeling shunned. A coalition of homeless activists in Los Angeles are also upset – feeling neglected as city officials rush to find housing for illegal immigrants.

Before we start taking in “refugees” from other countries, maybe we should start focusing on the refugees in our own backyard.

Free Immigration and a Welfare State?

Many on the left continue to quote the words inscribed on the Statue of Liberty, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…”

The problem with open borders today is that the system has dramatically changed.

In 1886, when the Statue of Liberty was gifted to the United States, we had no welfare system. Immigrants knew they had to work to make it in America, and they certainly did!

Today, we have a highly developed welfare system that gives these children money we cannot afford.

As America’s brilliant economist, Milton Friedman, once postulated: “It’s just obvious you can’t have free immigration and a welfare state.” The immigrants coming today are an immediate cash drain on an already-overtaxed welfare system – shoving American children out of the way to make more room for them

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamas-biggest-nightmare-just-become-reality/#7IfisQ3omJpLkEzR.99

 

 

You Know Things Are Really Bad For Obama When His Own Law Professor Says This…

Did he just throw Obama under the bus?

JUSTIN KOSKI — 

Things have gotten so bad that even the professors who taught Obama cannot see his fruits come to fruition. Here are comments from his law professor, Laurence Tribe, Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard Law School.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamas-law-professor-i-wouldnt-bet-on-obamacare-surviving/#IoV36Hyj3AuMS69z.99

 

WATCH: This Woman Just Called Hillary Clinton A Lesbian On Live TV

And Bill Clinton may not be monogamous?

JUSTIN KOSKI — 

The View’s soon-to-be-ex-host Jenny McCarthy posed to millions of Americans that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton might be a lesbian. And Bill might have lovers on the side. 

Seems like McCarthy is going out with a bang.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/person-on-the-view-calls-hillary-clinton-a-lesbian-on-live-tv/#qYhUw73hzvB6ISVY.99

 

 

You Know Things Are Really Bad For Obama When His Own Law Professor Says This…

Did he just throw Obama under the bus?

JUSTIN KOSKI — JULY 24, 2014

Things have gotten so bad that even the professors who taught Obama cannot see his fruits come to fruition. Here are comments from his law professor, Laurence Tribe, Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard Law School.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamas-law-professor-i-wouldnt-bet-on-obamacare-surviving/#Yfd4TXRhsP4lv28G.99

 

 

See How Liberals Just Used The Race Card To Try And Silence Ted Nugent

Though Nugent has not publicly commented…

  1. CHRISTOPHER AGEE

Ticketholders expecting a raucous Ted Nugent performance at an Idaho casino just learned the show has been canceled due to the rock legend and outspoken conservative’s alleged racist tendencies.

Without providing a single example to back up its claim, the Coeur d’Alene Native American tribe announced the Aug. 4 concert has been cancelled.

As for an explanation to fans looking forward to the event, casino owners only suggested that he has “racist attitudes and views.”

Though Nugent has not publicly commented on the decision as of this writing, his supporters took to Twitter to express their dismay.

Many expressed the view that Nugent, although often blunt in sharing his views, is far from a racist. In fact, several Twitter users pointed out that the star has long been an advocate of Native American causes.

The far-left Daily Kos called on hosts of other upcoming Nugent shows to follow suit in an article that included a statement by the tribe announcing its decision.

“The Coeur d’Alene Tribe has always been about human rights – for decades, we have worked individually and as a Tribe to make sure that each and every person is treated equally and with respect and dignity,” the statement indicated. 

Indicating his allegedly racist remarks were revealed by the Southern Poverty Law Center, the tribe chose not to cite any examples of the behavior they felt warranted a cancellation of his concert.

A number of social media responses picked up on the hypocrisy of calling off Nugent’s show while legitimately intolerant performers continue to perform unabated.

While plenty of Nugent’s detractors applauded the decision to cancel the show, his supporters seem to agree that the minor setback will have little to no effect on his appeal or his ability to draw crowds across the nation.

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/unbelievable-ted-nugent-concert-cancelled-based-vaguest-allegations/#gzk00CVqYXkatrbw.99

 

“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño  

  “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

July 23, 2014

No 711 “EN MI OPINIóN” Miercoles, Julio 23, 2014‏‏‏.‏

“IN GOD WE TRUS”   Lázaro R González Miño, Editor. 

Amenper: ¿Ingenuos, Idiotas o algo más?

Siempre que hablo con personas americanos, europeos o latinoamericanos o algunos cubanos que me dicen que el embargo no ha trabajado y que es mejor establecer relaciones con Cuba, para levantar el embargo y aliviar al pobre pueblo de Cuba me hago esta pregunta.  ¿Son ingenuos o hay algo más?

No he querido pensar que todos han nacido de meretrices.

Pero ahora la situación cambia

¿ Quien pudiera ser lo suficientemente ingenuo que se le podría ocurrir normalizar las relaciones de Estados Unidos con Cuba viendo la señal que nos envían de un acuerdo para reabrir una base rusa de “inteligencia de señales” allí?

 Raúl Castro y Vladimir Putin acordaron un trato en la Habana este mes.

Rusia obtiene autoridad para volver a abrir el sistema electrónico de espionaje;

 Cuba se sale del  gancho en que la había colgado Yeltsin, y se le perdonan el 90 por ciento de su deuda soviética a Rusia — acerca de $ 32 billones, según The New York Times.

Irónicamente, deuda desempeñó un papel en el cierre del Sr. Putin de la base en 2001 — porque Congreso Ruso lo culpó de su abandono de la reestructuración de la deuda externa rusa.

Actualizaciones tecnológicas para el puesto de escucha en Lourdes, fuera de la Habana y a unos 150 kilómetros de Florida, podrían reforzar sus capacidades anteriores.

En su apogeo, dice el Times, Lourdes monitoreaba a la marina norteamericana, el programa espacial de Estados Unidos y “microondas las transmisiones de las conversaciones telefónicas en el sureste de Estados Unidos” y hasta los correos electrónicos que yo les enviaba a ustedes todos los días.

Al mismo tiempo facilitaba las comunicaciones con espías rusos y Cubanos en Estados Unidos.

Fidel Castro afirmó que Lourdes entonces producía el 75 por ciento de la inteligencia estratégica de Rusia en los Estados Unidos

Abundan los interrogantes sobre lo que queda de las antiguas instalaciones de Lourdes y en qué medida puede o se constituirá, dado Rusia está luchando con situación económica precaria, que como sucede en todos los casos crece según avanza el socialismo.

La falta de dinero es lo que pudiera detener a Putin, porque lo que es por las Naciones Unidas y los Estados Unidos de Obama, Putin se hace caca y se limpia con ellos, y Raúl estaría encantado en ayudarlo.

 Por lo tanto, esta oleada de proyección de poder sea real o falso sigue siendo difícil de discernir.

Pero la señal para los apologistas Castro debería ser que las cosas que más parecen cambiar en Cuba, más permanecen igual.

Si todavía no quieren aceptarlo y siguen con la cantaleta de reanudar relaciones y levantar el embargo

tenemos que decirles la frase del pensamiento de un gran filósofo Ruso que dice….. “равительства Российской Федерации”, que transliterado quiere decir:   “Ustedes no son unos idiotas, son unos hijos de Puta”

 

 

Ricardo Samitier: Que verguenza… 46 senadores de USA votaron a favor de rendirse a la ONU

Conozca los Nombres De Los 46 Senadores Infiltrados “Globalistas” Que Votaron Para Entregar La Soberanía De USA A Las ONU…

Reproducimos un correo electrónico que nos envió’ Gladys una hermana nuestra, donde aparece el resultado de la votación en el senado norteamericano en contra de la resolución de la ONU, donde desarmarían al gran pueblo norteamericano.

El senador “cubano” Americano  Robert Menéndez de New Jersey junto al ya conocido izquierdista Charles Shumer voto’ a favor de la resolución de las Naciones Unidas. Por la cual los países perderían su soberanía nacional, al tener que entregar las armas.

Demostrando lo que siempre ha sido un demoliberal izquierdista hipocrita que esta’ en contra de los intereses norteamericanos.

Los del estado de la Florida tienen a otro antiamericano en Bill Nelson.

Es hora de votar en las proximas elecciones de Noviembre en contra de aquellos que con su actuacion favorecen el Nuevo Orden Mundial,sea “cubano” o sea quien sea.

Existen llamados “cubanos” en el congreso como Joe Garcia y ahora Robert Menendez en el senado,que favorecen los intereses antiamericanos.

Es hora de sacarlos del congreso y del senado.

Adjunto la lista de los que votaron a favor de las Naciones Unidas y en contra de los intereses de America.

Por Dios,la Patria y la Familia

Arriba Cuba.  Subject: U.N. Resolution 2117 a 53-46 vote

The U.N. Resolution 2117 lists 21 points dealing with firearms control, but perhaps of most interest is point number 11. It: “CALLS FOR MEMBER STATES TO SUPPORT WEAPONS COLLECTION and DISARMAMENT of all UN countries”.

By a 53-46 vote – The U.S. Senate voted against the U.N. resolution. 

For Only 7 Votes…  USA was Saved This Time…

This is NOT a, glorious moment in history when everyone stands around…reloading.Now, Which 46 Senators Voted to Destroy Us? Well, let their names become known ! See below . If you vote in one of the states listed with these 46 “legis..traitors”… vote against them. 

In a 53-46 vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.  The Statement of Purpose from the Senate Bill reads:  “To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.”  The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms.  The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S. and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry, now get this, on all private guns and ammo.

 

Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power.

 

Here are the 46 senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.

Baldwin (D-WI)

Baucus (D-MT)

Bennett (D-CO)

Blumenthal (D-CT)

Boxer (D-CA)

Brown (D-OH)

Cantwell (D-WA)

Cardin (D-MD)

Carper (D-DE)

CASEY (D-PA)     

Coons (D-DE)

Cowan (D-MA)

Durbin (D-IL)

Feinstein (D-CA)

Franken (D-MN)

Gillibrand (D-NY)

Harkin (D-IA)

Hirono (D-HI)

Johnson (D-SD)

Kaine (D-VA)

King (I-ME)

Klobuchar (D-MN)

Landrieu (D-LA)

Leahy (D-VT)

Levin (D-MI)

McCaskill (D-MO)

ROBERT MENENDEZ [D NJ.]

Merkley (D-OR)

Mikulski (D-MD)

Murphy (D-CT)

Murray (D-WA)

Nelson (D-FL)

Reed (D-RI)

Reid (D-NV)

Rockefeller (D-WV)

Sanders (I-VT)

Schatz (D-HI)

Schumer (D-NY)

Shaheen (D-NH)

Stabenow (D-MI)

Udall (D-CO)

Udall (D-NM)

Warner (D-VA)

Warren (D-MA)

Whitehouse (D-RI)

Wyden (D-OR)

 

Folks: This needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take OUR guns. They need to lose their next election. We have been betrayed.

46 Senators Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.

 

Please send this to SOMEONE!

Ricardo: From: elsa   

 

He aquí el artículo que me enviaron y está MUY BUENO 

ESPEREMOS NO SE  REPITA LA VERGUENZA MUNDIAL POR MIRAR A OTRO LADO CON IGNORANCIA. LEER ESTO ES OBLIGATORIO
 
Con ardiente preocupación

Por Marcos Aguinis | LA NACION

 

Observo la escalada de violencia en Medio Oriente que se inició con el asesinato de tres adolescentes israelíes, y a eso me voy a referir. Pero, para hacerlo con buena base, urge recordar que el 14 de marzo de 1937, casi dos años antes de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, el papa Pío XI lanzó una trascendental encíclica, Mit brennender Sorge (Con ardiente preocupación).

Rompió con el estilo tradicional de titularlas en latín y la publicó en alemán. Su intención denunciadora era evidente, a pesar de las precauciones diplomáticas del texto y la poca fuerza que tuvo su difusión urbi et orbi. Contiene frases vigorosas contra el nazismo. Pero su mensaje no fue acatado por el universo católico en su totalidad, ni siquiera por prelados que cayeron bajo la fascinación nazi. Pío XI fue más lúcido y valiente que muchos líderes mundiales.

La culpa por la inmensa tragedia que asoló al mundo no sólo corresponde a los nazis, sino a quienes les permitieron fortalecer su delirio, envalentonarse, armarse e imponerse, con la idiota esperanza de que se podía detenerlos mediante afectuosas concesiones.

El acuerdo de Munich, firmado en 1938 para “solucionar” la crisis de los Sudetes -que el ingenuo Chamberlain consideró maravillosa garantía para “una paz de cien años”-, fue la última prueba que necesitaba Hitler para saber que Occidente y sus valores eran un castillo de papel. Pactó con Stalin, invadió Polonia y comenzó a extenderse como una venenosa mancha que aspiraba a dominar el planeta.

La Guerra Fría que sucedió a la Segunda Guerra Mundial produjo nuevos sufrimientos y matanzas. La caída del imperio soviético, sin embargo, no implicó el fin de la historia, sino el comienzo de otra, en la que surgió un inesperado protagonista: el fundamentalismo islámico. Por ahora no es universal, pero aspira a serlo.

Tiene diversos matices, como los tuvieron al comienzo las formaciones que seguían a Hitler. No impiden que se unan tras objetivos comunes: el sunnita Hamas está aliado con los chiitas de Hezbollah y de Irán. La opresión de las minorías cristianas en todo el Medio Oriente, que genera una continua emigración por motivos religiosos -¡a esta altura de la historia!-, es apenas comentada.

Las técnicas regresivas de los fanáticos están alcanzado un salvajismo poco creíble, como la crucifixión de mucha gente. Sí, ¡la crucifixión! Ahora la aplican a cristianos y herejes de Siria.

En el Medio Oriente ya se han despejado amplias zonas Judenrein (limpias de judíos). La discriminación étnico-religiosa empezó en 1948, durante la guerra de la independencia de Israel, una conflagración desencadenada por seis Estados árabes contra la población judía de Tierra Santa, con el manifiesto propósito de ahogarla en el mar. En forma paralela, casi 800.000 judíos fueron expulsados de Libia, Egipto, Marruecos, Túnez, Siria e Irak. Ahora no queda un solo judío en la Franja de Gaza. También la Autoridad Palestina aspira a la total ausencia de judíos bajo su jurisdicción. En cambio, el 20% de la población israelí es árabe, con plenos derechos ciudadanos.

La alianza de la Unión Soviética con los regímenes árabes y el feroz antisionismo estalinista de la izquierda determinaron la descalificación permanente de Israel. En todos los foros y circunstancias, el acorralado Israel es acusado porque boga o porque no boga. Para conseguirlo, se entronizó a los palestinos como víctimas privilegiadas. Se empezó a considerar que cualquier crimen, abuso o publicidad calumniosa de los palestinos es producto de la “ocupación”.

Incluso donde ya no hay ocupación. ¡A tener en cuenta este dato! Israel arrancó de las orejas a todos los judíos de la Franja de Gaza para dar con el gusto a la demanda palestina de una efectiva desocupación. Primero desocupó Gaza y luego vendría el resto. ¿Qué hicieron los palestinos con su libertad y los fondos de ayuda internacional? ¿Grandes hoteles para sus playas hermosas? ¿Convertir a Gaza en la Costa Azul del Mediterráneo oriental? ¿Demostrar a su vecino Israel que desean convivir en paz, con el fin de estimularlo a desocupar también Cisjordania?

No. Trabajaron para cavar túneles por donde contrabandear armas y construir cohetes que disparan a diario contra las poblaciones israelíes. Decenas y decenas de cohetes pretenden asesinar la mayor cantidad de personas en las ciudades, aldeas y kibutzim de los alrededores. Gente de todas las edades debe correr a diario hacia los refugios, aterrorizada, cuando suenan las alarmas.

Pero la prensa no se ocupa de señalarlo con la indignación que corresponde. Israel no es la víctima privilegiada y, en consecuencia, no tiene derecho a la solidaridad del mundo. En cambio, apenas son destruidas las bases de lanzamiento misilístico (incluso con operaciones de precisión quirúrgica para no afectar a los civiles), aúllan contra la “agresión israelí”. Invito a prestar atención sobre este punto.

Advertirán que siempre se destaca con más fuerza la respuesta israelí que la provocación terrorista. El resultado es obvio: un envalentonamiento que estimula a más túneles, más armas, más misiles, más guerra.

También es necesario enfatizar que para los extremistas la “ocupación israelí” no se limita a los territorios que el Estado judío liberó de jordanos y egipcios en 1967, sino a todo Israel, incluido Tel Aviv. Así lo estipula la plataforma de Hamas. Israel es detestado por judío, pero es más detestado por constituir un baluarte de los valores democráticos y progresistas que produjo Occidente. En el fondo, es una guerra de civilizaciones. O una guerra contra la civilización, para devolvernos a la Edad Media.

Gaza podría ser inducida a crecer pacíficamente. Bastaría con que las fuentes que proveen grandes recursos a sus autoridades cortaran las transferencias en cuanto lancen un solo misil más. Hay que obligarlos a ser responsables sobre la vida y el futuro de su pueblo. No se debe tolerar que esos recursos se desvíen hacia campañas de odio, entrenamiento de mártires y fabricación de misiles. Disuadirlos de una buena vez, como no se supo hacer oportunamente con los nazis. Entonces Gaza disfrutará de la paz y logrará su progreso.

Para evitar otra nueva escalada de violencia como la que ahora arrecia, hace falta otra vez la lúcida voz de Pío XI que exija a los gobiernos sensatos, a los organismos internacionales, a la gran prensa, a los millones de árabes y musulmanes moderados poner freno a la exaltación fundamentalista que se incrementa con el incesante apaleo a Israel y la escandalosa ausencia de condenas a la permanente incitación al odio que fermenta en Gaza, Cisjordania, casi todos los países árabes y muchas otras zonas del mundo sumidas en una enorme confusión..

 

 

Master Of Diplomacy John Kerry Gets Caught Blasting Israel

by Matt Fox

The Obama administration’s disdain for Israel and its Prime Minister is nothing new. Yet, six years into its term, Team Obama still pretends like it has the back of Israelis, mostly in an attempt to not look like another Jimmy Carter administration. In that regard, they’ve completely failed.

Whether snubbing Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, proposing a return to pre-1967 borders, or engaging with Iran while Tehran threatened a nuclear Holocaust against Israel, the Obama presidency has been one that’s created more distance between America and her greatest ally than ever before. During his infamous Cairo speech, Obama drew a parallel between Jewish suffering during the Holocaust and the experience of Palestinians. He has also attacked the Israeli “occupation” during a speech at the United Nations, and that’s not even to mention then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s call for Israel to demonstrate some “respect” towards its adversaries.

Read the rest of this Liberty Alliance article here: http://libertyalliance.com/2014/07/master-diplomacy-john-kerry-gets-caught-blasting-israel/#Mb3WjZqheEFkjf3t.99

 

 

obama’s Immigration Crisis is a Threat to Our National Security‏.

David Horowitz Freedom Center | HorowitzFreedomCenter.org

 
 

Dear Conservative,

The illegal immigrants just keep on coming!

Barack Obama can’t get amnesty for more than 10 million illegal immigrants already in the U.S. through the political process, so he’s enabling an invasion of illegal “children” from Central America. 

Don’t be fooled. The administration has known about this “crisis” for well over a year. Over 20,000 of these children arrived on our soil in 2013. There will be another 60,000 this year. And many are not “kids” at all, but are rather seasoned criminals and gangbangers!

Worse, of the more than 100,000 illegal “children” who’ve swarmed over U.S. borders in the last four years, only 3,500 have been deported. No wonder many of them arrive wearing tennis shoes bearing Obama’s picture!

The Freedom Center is fighting back — will you help us?

This is not an humanitarian crisis; it’s a national security crisis! Barack Obama is undermining our national security by turning our borders into a sieve! And we here at the Freedom Center believe the nation’s borders should be an inviolable line in the sand! We believe that any consideration of the immigration issue has to begin with national security, especially after the events of 9/11.

Americans need to understand that in allowing gaping holes to be punched in our borders the Obama administration is creating a passageway for terrorists along with “children.” We need to get the word out immediately about this invasion of illegal immigrants — who are injected directly into American communities by the federal government without so much as a detention hearing — and what it means for the future of our country. 

That is why I asked a team of Front Page’s experts to produce a special E-Book titled, “Obama’s Immigration Crisis and National Security.” This work will feature essays from our best FrontPage writers including Bruce Thornton, Daniel Greenfield and JihadWatch editor Robert Spencer, along with others who have provided front line dispatches on the immigration chaos.

For your emergency tax-deductible donation of $30 or more, I will get you a digital copy of “Obama’s Immigration Crisis and National Security” right away.

What are the dangers of Islamists using the current “crisis” to further infiltrate our porous borders and defenses? What is the long-term impact on the breakup of our national sovereignty as we increasingly Balkanize into ethnic enclaves? Have we learned nothing about the dangers of bi-nationalism from bloody events in Ukraine? These are the questions that need to be asked and they are the questions that “Obama’s Immigration Crisis and National Security” will address.

FrontPage never pulls any punches, never bows to political correctness and never wilts in the face of attacks from the political elites or mainstream media (which is another way of saying the Left.) We write hard-hitting articles on immigration and the other issues that truly count day in day out. And you know from our reports that the current manifestation of the immigration issue is about much more than some children finding refuge in America. Remember what Obama’s mentor, the 1960s radical Saul Alinksy said, “The issue is never the issue. It’s all about power.”

“Obama’s Immigration Crisis and National Security” will tell it like it is. That is why we need to get this publication in the electronic mailboxes of all the elected political figures in the country — federal and state — and in the mailboxes of the journalists around the country who are acting as mouthpieces for the administration’s “explanation” that the current invasion of immigrants “just happened” and that it is helpless to stem the tide. 

And you can help us sound the alarm. For a contribution of just $30 we will send you the free download of “Obama’s Immigration Crisis and National Security.”

Even better, your contribution will allow us to assemble the electronic mail lists of hundreds of thousands of other policy and opinion makers who need to hear the truth about this immigration “crisis.” 

Now more than ever we need to act on Edmund Burke’s warning that all that is required for evil to succeed is for good to do nothing. Thank you for all you do the Freedom Center and for America. 

Sincerely, 

David Horowitz 

 

 

ObamaCare subsidies in jeopardy

Posted on July 23, 2014 by Cowboy Byte

Gee another “glitch” imagine that.
Check it out:

A pillar of ObamaCare was put in jeopardy Tuesday as two appeals courts split on whether the law’s premium subsidies are legal in 36 states.

In the first ruling, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals said the Affordable Care Act (ACA) does not permit the IRS to distribute premium subsidies on exchanges established by the federal government.

Hours later, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals came to the opposite conclusion, ruling that the IRS in fact has the authority to issue the subsidies on federally run exchanges because of ambiguity in the law.

The contradictory rulings thrust ObamaCare back into the headlines and raised the possibility of another Supreme Court showdown between the Obamaadministration and opponents of the new federal healthcare system.

Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/32104/obamacare-subsidies-jeopardy/#hQAoBFbhJErg3WeE.99

 

Ricardo: Se robaron las banderas de USA y Pusieron la Bandera Blanca de RENDICION+..

Izaron Banderas Blancas De Rendición A Las 3:24 AM De Hoy… En El Puente De Brooklyn En New York… En Sustitución de Las Banderas De USA… A Pesar De Estar El Puente Vigilado Por La Policía 24/7 Lo Podían Haber VOLADO… Pues La Policía No Vio Nada. White flags planted on Brooklyn Bridge, American flags missing as mystery deepens

The vandals apparently used aluminum pans — ‘like the ones you cook turkeys with’ — to cover the bridge’s lights and their tracks, a police source said. The motivation for the stunt, however, is still unknown.

BY THOMAS TRACY ROCCO PARASCANDOLA LARRY MCSHANE 

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

White flags are seen flying over the two towers of the Brooklyn Bridge, but how they got there is a mystery. 

 

Two high-flying American flags were surreptitiously swiped from atop the Brooklyn Bridge and mysteriously replaced early Tuesday with a pair of white flags, police said.

The substitute banners were flying by sunrise from atop the 273-foot towers on the venerable bridge despite the round-the-clock NYPD security on the span.

What remained unclear hours later was who was responsible, what happened to the missing American flags — and how the thieves scaled the towers without drawing any attention.

The vandals apparently used big aluminum pans, “like the ones you cook turkeys with,” to cover the bridge’s lights and their tracks, a police source said.

A 24-hour camera feed from the bridge showed the lights on both towers going dark at 3:42 a.m., and never going back on. By the time the sun rose, the white flags were flapping in the breeze.

 The Brooklyn Bridge is considered a high-profile terrorist location, and there is a marked NYPD patrol car positioned on the Manhattan side of the bridge 24/7 as a counterterrorism measure.

  A white flag was flying over the Brooklyn Bridge on Tuesday (L) where Old Glory normally waves (R).

Construction worker Donald Mitchell, 37, said the replacements appeared to be American flags bleached completely white.

“You could still see the stars and stripes,” said Mitchell, who was working on the bridge. “My first reaction was, ‘This is where you land the plane. X marks the spot.’ It was really scary.”

The NYPD source said the white flag on the Manhattan side appeared to be homemade, while the one on the Brooklyn side was an American flag bleached white.

A parody group, the Bicycle Lobby, joked that it hung the white flags to signal surrender of the bridge’s bicycle path to pedestrians.

Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams failed to see the humor in any of it: “If flying a white flag atop the Brooklyn Bridge is someone’s idea of a joke, I’m not laughing.”

Members of the New York Police Department secure a barrier to the Brooklyn Bridge after two high-flying American flags were swiped overnight. 

PreviousNext

 

The stolen red, white and blue flags hung on the bridge are 12-foot by 18-foot banners installed by specially trained workers from atop a precarious perch above the East River.

Workers began taking down the white banners around 11 a.m. after NYPD crime scene investigators determined there was no bomb or any notes left with the flags, cops said.

The flags, which are illuminated at night, are fastened with steel clips and only taken down for replacement when they become frayed or weathered.

It was not the first theft of a U.S. flag from the bridge. During the Republican National Convention in 2004, protesters made off with the flag and demanded the release of demonstrators arrested by the NYPD.

Reaching the flags is a difficult and dangerous trip handled by specially trained Department of Transportation workers.

My first reaction was, ‘This is where you land the plane. X marks the spot.’ It was really scary.

The employees, who work in teams and are attached to a tether, walk along a quarter-mile of cable about one foot in diameter to a ladder.

They then climb into the sky and onto a platform where they have access to the flags.

To deter any vandals, there’s no way to lower the flags — they can only be removed or replaced by going up to the platform.

The flags are lowered to half-staff to mark the death of a dignitary, or a city firefighter or police officer killed in the line of duty.

With Rikki Reyna

ttracy@nydailynews.com

​Bin Laden is dead and I’m playing Golf do not f….
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/american-flags-stolen-atop-brooklyn-bridge-cops-article-1.1875673#ixzz38EGs92uh

RICARDO: Interesante prueba… este email salió originalmente con el siguiente Subject:  Alinsky y las reglas del buen rebelde

Publicado por Javier Segura del Pozo

 

Se perdió en el camino al punto que ni yo recibi la copia.

¿Ustedes lo recibieron por casualidad?  ¿Será que el apellido Alinsky esta censurado si aparece en el Subject?

Casualidad el mismo email pero con el Subject: La Escuela de Frankfurt, durante la segunda guerra mundial funcionó hasta el año 1950 en los E.E.U.U, financiada por la Fundación Rockefeller.

Sí salió y recibí copia.

¿Las manos peludas tendrán los brazos cada vez… más largos?

 

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Enrique Artalejo <artalejoenrique@gmail.com>
Date: 2014-07-22 14:10 GMT-05:00
Subject: La Escuela de Frankfurt, durante la segunda guerra mundial funcionó hasta el año 1950 en los E.E.U.U, financiada por la Fundación Rockefeller.
To: Capitol Hill Cubans <capitolhillcubans@gmail.com>

Cuando se ideó “el mundo uno”, el politólogo polaco Zbigniew Brzezinsky”, tenía diseñado que el nuevo orden mundial se edifique sobre una sociedad tecnotrónica, con humanismo marxista. Cabe aquí consignar que la Escuela de Frankfurt, durante la segunda guerra mundial funcionó hasta el año 1950 en los E.E.U.U, financiada por la Fundación Rockefeller.

 

Saul Alinsky y las reglas del buen rebelde

Publicado por Javier Segura del Pozo el 3 abril, 2011

Comentarios (7)

Por Javier Segura del Pozo

Médico salubrista 

 

“Todo cambio implica desorganización de lo anterior para la organización de algo nuevo”, dijo Obama durante un discurso. Pocos sabían que se basaba en una cita de Saul Alinsky, destacado activista americano, organizador comunitario y paisano suyo de Chicago, que inspiró la llamada revolución de los patios traseros (Backyard Revolution). La apreciable influencia que Alinsky sigue teniendo, no solo entre los trabajadores comunitarios y activistas sociales anglo-sajones, sino entre prominentes políticos americanos, como Obama o Hillary Clinton (que hizo su tesis de licenciatura sobre la obra de Alinsky), y el hecho de que sus tácticas de agitación sean imitadas también por los movimientos reaccionarios americanos, como el Tea Party, hace que merezca la pena que dediquemos un capitulo de nuestra serie de Desarrollo comunitario , al legado de Alinsky. 

 

 

A la izquierda: foto de graduación universitaria de Hillary Clinton en 1969 con 23 añitos en elWellesley College, donde presentó su tesis de licenciatura en ciencias políticas sobre Saul D. Alinsky. Fuente:http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/03/04/a_students_words_a_candidates_struggle/. A la derecha: foto de Obama durante una clase en un instituto de Chicago, en las que expone las ideas de Alinsky sobre el análisis del poder, ayudándose de un esquema en la pizarra. Fuente:http://www.thenextright.com/category/blog-tags/saul-alinsky. Ambas fotos han sido profusamente utilizadas, en los últimos dos años, en medios y bloggs de la extrema derecha americana (y española), para “probar” que EE.UU. estaría gobernada por “peligrosos marxistas que siguen las enseñanzas de radicales como Alinsky, que buscaban destruir la democracia americana”.

 

 

La revolución de los patios traseros (Backyard Revolution)

 

“Debemos siempre recordar que una auténtica organización del pueblo, aquella en la que éste confíe totalmente y considere definitivamente como propia, debe estar enraizada en las propias experiencias del pueblo. Esto es esencial si la organización se va a construir y fundar sobre el pueblo”.

(Alinsky, 1969, Reveill for Radicals)

 

Saul Alinsky (1909-1972) desarrolló su activismo social en el Chicago de los años 30, castigado por la gran depresión y controlado por la Mafia, que albergó los llamados vecindarios de patios traseros (Back-of-the-yards neighbourhood). En estos patios traseros construidos en áreas industriales deterioradas de grandes corrales de ganado, se concentraba la población en situación de pobreza extrema[1]. En 1938 le encargaron a Saúl Alinsky, como estudiante de postgrado de arqueología, contratado como criminólogo por el estado de Illinois, una investigación sobre las causas de la delincuencia juvenil. Como un observador del mundo de Al Capone, llegó a la convicción de que la conducta criminal era un síntoma de la pobreza y ausencia de poder de los más desfavorecidos.

 

También, de que no podía seguir siendo un observador distante. Él había crecido en el barrio judío de Chicago, con una educación materna, que le llevaba a la convicción apasionada de quela justicia social podía alcanzarse a través de la profundización de la democracia, y que, en vez de conformarse con lo dado, había que rebelarse contra lo que estaba claramente mal. Sus métodos no tenían una gran base teórica, sino que se guiaban por la premisa de que enseñar a las comunidades pobres como podían organizarse, no solo les restauraba su dignidad, sino que les permitía enfrentarse eficaz y estratégicamente a los poderosos[2].

 

Desarrollando estos métodos organizativos[3], fundó organizaciones populares de base (People’s organisations)[4] , que extendieron la llamada revolución de los patios traseros (Backyard Revolution), a través de varias ciudades norteamericanas (Chicago, California, Michigan, Nueva York, Kansas city, etc). Mediante asambleas de consejos de patios trasero (Backyard council meeting), las comunidades aprendían a  usar los cauces de  participación democrática y reivindicación de sus derechos civiles, para defender sus intereses y luchar contra la discriminación racial, la pobreza y el aislamiento social. 

 

 

Video de presentación del documental “The Democratic Promise: Saul Alinsky & His Legacy”(La promesa democrática: Saul Alinsky y su legado) (1999). El famoso abolicionista Frederick Douglas escribió: “El poder no concede nada sin demanda previa”. El film es la historia de gente sencilla, demandando a los poderosos el gobierno de sus propias vidas. Narrado por el actor Alec Baldwin, el documental examina tanto la historia de la organización de comunidades, a través de la obra de Saul Alinsky, así como el estado actual de este proceso de organización comunitaria en algunos barrios y organizaciones actuales de Nueva York y Tejas. En un sentido más amplio, el programa trata sobre la restauración de la democracia americana a través de la participación compartida del público en la vida civil; un antídoto vital para una era de incremento de la alienación ciudadana y la apatía del votante (No solo en EE.UU., añadiria yo). Fuente:http://www.itvs.org/films/democratic-promise

 

 

El primer paso en la organización comunitaria es la desorganización comunitariaAlinsky tenía una profunda fe en la democracia americana, pero no era un ingenuo. Las cosas no se conceden, sin pelea. Sabia que los explotados tenían que enfrentarse de forma inteligente a los poderosos, que corrompían los valores de esta democracia y aprovechaban sus reglas de juego para sus fines de dominación y explotación. Sus métodos de lucha eran no violentos, pero, a la vez, radicales. Radicales en sus intenciones (ir a las raíces y no a los síntomas) y en sus tácticas: identificar al contrincante (el poderoso, el explotador), acosarle sin tregua y batirle sin piedad. A la vez, ganarse la confianza de la comunidad, sacarla de la apatía, implicarla en el activismo y enseñar a organizarse eficazmente frente a los enemigos. Su formula era la combinación de los verbos agitar, antagonizar, educar y organizar.

 

“Si tu función es atacar la apatía y llevar a la gente a participar, es necesario atacar los patrones preexistentes de vida organizada en la comunidad. El primer paso en la organización comunitaria es la desorganización comunitaria.

 

 

Foto de Saul Alisnky. Fuente y fechas desconocidas

 

 

Reglas para radicales (Rules for Radicals)[5]

 

Alinsky recogió en 1946 su filosofía y métodos organizativas en un libro ya clásico denominadoReveill for Radicals (se podría traducir como Toque de diana para radicales). En 1971, un año antes de su muerte, escribió otro libro, donde,  mediante 11 reglas o recetas, sintetizaba sus enseñanzas. Éstas eran el  fruto de las batallas de lucha comunitaria más exitosas llevadas a cabo, no solo en su experiencia anerior de los años 40 y 50, sino  por la activa generación rebelde americana de los años sesenta (de las luchas por los derechos civiles y las protestas contra la Guerra de Vietnam). Emulando el estilo del breviario de “El Príncipe”, pretendía ser el Machiavello de los desposeídos.

 

Según Alisnky, un activista debe empezar por superar las sospechas ante el recién llegado (especialmente si viene de fuera) y ganarse la credibilidad. Después, debe empezar con las tareas de agitación: restregar los resentimientos, airear las hostilidades y buscar las controversias. Un organizador debe atacar la apatía y estropear los patrones previos de vida comunitaria complaciente, donde a la gente le resulta fácil el aceptar una situación mala.(Recordad: El primer paso en la organización comunitaria es la desorganización comunitaria).

 

Izquierda: Portada de “Reveill for Radicals” (1946); Derecha: Portada de “Rules for Radicals” (1971)

 

A través de un proceso que combina esperaza y resentimiento, el organizador comunitario trata de crear un “ejército de masas” que trata de fichar el máximo número de reclutas de organizaciones locales, iglesias, servicios comunitarios (incluidos, los de salud), sindicatos, bandas de barrio e individuos. Alinsky proporciona en el libro una serie de 11 reglas, que deben ser adaptadas a la vida real y a las situaciones concretas.

 
Regla 1: El Poder no es solo lo que tienes, sino lo que tus oponentes creen que tienes. Si tu organización es pequeña, oculta tus números en la oscuridad y arma barullo, para que todo el mundo crea que tienes más seguidores de los que tienes.

 

Regla 2: Nunca vayas más allá de la experiencia de tu gente. El resultado es confusión, temor y repliegue.

 

Regla 3: Siempre que sea posible, ve más allá de la experiencia de tu oponente. Así le causarás confusión, temor y repliegue.

 

Regla 4: Provoca el que tus oponentes no vivan a la altura de su propio libro de reglas. “Puedes destruirlos con esto, ya que no podrán seguir obedeciendo sus propias reglas, así como la iglesia cristiana no vive a la altura del cristianismo”.

Regla 5: El ridículo es la más potente arma del hombre. Es difícil contraatacar el ridículo, y enfurece a la oposición, que después tiene una reacción que te favorece.

 

Regla 6: Una buena táctica es aquella que divierte a tu propia gente. “Si tu gente no se lo está pasando muy bien, hay algo que falla en tu táctica”.

 

Regla 7: Una táctica que se alarga demasiado, se convierte en una lata. El compromiso se transforma en algo ritual, cuando la gente se interesa en otros asuntos.

 

Regla 8: Mantén la presión. Usa diferentes tácticas y acciones y usa los sucesos del periodo en tu provecho. “La premisa mayor de las tácticas es el desarrollo de operaciones que mantendrán una presión constante sobre la oposición, que le llevará a reaccionar a favor tuyo”.

 

Regla 9: La amenaza es más terrorífica que el hecho en sí. Cuando Alinsky deja caer que un gran numero de pobres iban a encerrarse en los aseos del aeropuerto O’Hare, las autoridades municipales de Chicago rápidamente aceptan un compromiso a largo plazo para organizar losguettos. Imaginaban a cientos de pasajeros saliendo de los aviones y encontrándose los aseos ocupados. Después imaginaban el bochorno internacional y el daño a la reputación de la ciudad.

 

 Regla 10: El precio de un ataque exitoso es disponer de una alternativa constructiva. “Evita ser atrapado por un oponente o un entrevistador que dice: Eso está bien, pero ¿y tú que harías?”

 

Regla 11: Escoge el objetivo, congélalo, personalízalo, polarízalo. No intentes atacar empresas o administraciones abstractas. Identifica un responsable individual. Ignora los intentos de desplazar o dispersar la responsabilidad

Según Alinsky, la principal tarea del activista u organizador es acosar a un oponente hasta que reaccione “El enemigo adecuadamente aguijoneado y guiado en su reacción será tu mayor fortaleza”.

……………………………………………………………

Este artículo forma parte de la serie “Desarrollo comunitario”, escrito por Javier Segura del Pozo, que lleva las siguientes entregas publicadas hasta ahora:

  1. Desarrollo comunitario-Community development
  2. Desarrollo comunitario radical, según Margaret Ledwith
  3. Las uniones de crédito (”Credit union”)
  4. Las comunidades compasivas: el bienestar en el  final de la vida
  5. Food mapping: midiendo el acceso a alimentos saludables
  6. Salop Drive Market Garden, un ejemplo de Agricultura Urbana.
  7. El enfoque ABCD de desarrollo comunitario
  8. El mapa de recursos de una comunidad (Asset mapping)
  9. La investigación apreciativa (Appreciative inquiry)
  10. El banco de tiempo
  11. José María Arizmendarrieta y el movimiento cooperativo de Mondragón
  12. “Healthy living centres” o centros de vida saludable, Gran Bretaña (1999-2010)
  13. Saul Alinsky y las reglas del buen rebelde

………………………………………………………………………………………….

[1] Leer la novela de Upton Sinclair “La jungla” (The Jungle) de 1906, sobre las terribles condiciones de vida en los Union Stock Yards

[2] Estos párrafos estan basados en una traducción del texto de Margaret Ledwith, “Community development. A critical approach”. BASW. 2008. Pag 88.

[3] http://www.itvs.org/films/democratic-promise

[4] En 1936 dejó las agencias estatales y fundó el Consejo de la Vecindad (Backyard council). Más tarde, fundó la Fundación de las Áreas Industriales (Industrial Areas Foundation-IAF), con el fin de llevar su método a las reformas en áreas urbanas en declive. En los años sesenta fundó la vecindad TWO para organizar las comunidades afro-americanas. La IAF formó a cientos de lideres ciudadanos, sindicalistas y activistas americanos prominentes, como por ejemplo Cesar Chavez y Dolores Huerta.

[5] Basado en una traducción del texto de The Citizen’s Handbook (en:http://www.vcn.bc.ca/citizens-handbook/rules.html)

Share on linkedinShare on googleShare on emailMore Sharing ServicesCompartir

Etiquetas: 

Desarrollo comunitarioSalud Comunitaria

Si te gustó esta entrada anímate a escribir un comentario o suscribirte al feed y obtener los artículos futuros en tu lector de feeds.

Comentarios

Pingback by Saul Alinsky y las reglas del buen rebelde « salud comunitaria el 3 abril 2011 @ 22:08

[…] Fantástica entrada de Javier Segura del Pozo en Salud Pública y algo más. […]

Comentario by Juan Luis Ruiz Jimenez el 5 abril 2011 @ 22:39

Me gustaría compartir con vuestro blog dentro del Ambito del “Desarrollo Comunitario” el tema del Papel del ciudadano en temas de salud y de los servicios sanitarios que nos parece importante profundizar, debatir y proponer líneas de trabajo y compromiso.

El tema tiene muchos aspectos y probablemente demasiado amplio y tengamos que ir acotando.

Se me ocurren algunos aspectos:

-Derechos y deberes de la ciudadanía en temas de salud y de los servicios sanitarios. Ámbitos individual y colectivo

-Participación comunitaria en salud. Historia, marco conceptual, derecho y/o instrumento,….

-Instrumentos y organos de participación comunitaria

-Situación en el Sistema Sanitario Español. Luces y sombras. Desarrollo legislativo y politico y social

-Como promoverla.

-La información sanitaria al servicio de la ciudadanía para la toma de decisiones

-las distribución del poder en los sistemas sanitarios,…

Seguro que entre todos/as somos capaces de construir algo interesante y debate.

Me informáis que o parece, si es posible en vuestro blog y como lo podemos hacer

Un saludo

Juan Luis

Comentario by Javier Segura el 5 abril 2011 @ 23:18

Hola Juan Luis,

La propuesta que haces es muy interesante. Por supuesto que cualquiera de los temas que propones desarrollar o debatir podria incluirse en la serie de DC del blog. Todos ellos giran alrededor de la “partcipacion comunitaria”, que es como en nuestro medio se ha enfocado el DC. O bien, desde la vertiente de la “investigación-acción”.

¿De qué estamos hablando cuando usamos estos términos? ¿Participar? ¿En qué? ¿En la gestion de un centro de salud? ¿En las decisiones que se toman en un barrio o en una ciudad? ¿Participar o compartir el poder de decision? ¿Es lo mismo?

¿Hablamos incluso de poder tomar las propias decisiones sobre la salud al margen del sistema santario? ¿Hablamos de autonomia, de desmedicalización?

¿Participar o Reivindicar?

Cuando hablamos de partcipacion comunitaria, entramos pues en el campo del poder ¿En qué situaciones se comparte el poder?

¿Hablamos del derecho a la partcipacion reconocido por una ley? ¿Porque no se cumple la ley? ¿como se hace efectivo este derecho? Reprodusco una de las citas de este artículo sobe Alinsky: “El poder no concede nada sin demanda previa”.

Propongo que arranques con la redacción de uno de los temas que propones. Cualquiera. Lo publicariamos, con la invitacion a ser debatido. Es una forma de tirar del hilo. Podriamos hacer recircular este debate y el material resultante(en otros blogs, otros foros, etc).

Otras personas interesadas podrian animarse a arrancar con otros temas de los que propones o proponer otros. Siempre desde la optica de la experiencia y el conocimiento que cada uno puede aportar o compartir. Nunca desde lo puramente académico o como si hicieramos un temario de oposición. Desde la libertad de cada uno y sin cortarse porque uno crea que debe ser un erudito para escribir.

¿Que te parece? ¿Te animas?

Un saludo

Javier

Comentario by Juan Luis Ruiz-Gimenez el 6 abril 2011 @ 9:10

Gracias Javier:
Me parece correcto
Las preguntas que planteas son las que creo que todos nos planteamos y son aspectos de la tematica que podemos ir opinando y aportando experiencias, vivencia y evidencias.
Iré mandando reflexiones y algunos debates y ver como conseguimos avanzar
Confio poder dominar al control de seguridadpara que te entre este comentario

Pingback by Food Mapping « Ciclo Imagen Urbana el 2 enero 2012 @ 22:14

[…] Saul Alinsky y las reglas del buen rebelde […]

Pingback by Tratado para radicales. Manual para revolucionarios pragmáticos, de Saul Alinsky « lejos del tiempo el 20 octubre 2012 @ 11:29

[…] Saul Alinsky (1909-1972) fue un activista y pensador estadounidense, considerado el “padre” del community organizing, una corriente estadounidense de organización comunitaria. Fue fundador de la Industrial Areas Foundation, organización con presencia en todo EEUU que cuenta en nuestros días con miles de socios. Además de Tratado para radicales, escribió en 1946 Reveille for Radicals, sin traducción al castellano. […]

Pingback by Rules For Radicals | ERRR-Magazine el 26 febrero 2013 @ 23:10

[…] “Todo cambio implica desorganización de lo anterior para la organización de algo nuevo”, dijo Obama durante un discurso. Pocos sabían que se basaba en una cita de Saul Alinsky, destacado activista americano, organizador comunitario y paisano suyo de Chicago, que inspiró la llamada revolución de los patios traseros (Backyard Revolution). La apreciable influencia que Alinsky sigue teniendo, no solo entre los trabajadores comunitarios y activistas sociales anglo-sajones, sino entre prominentes políticos americanos, como Obama o Hillary Clinton (que hizo su tesis de licenciatura sobre la obra de Alinsky), y el hecho de que sus tácticas de agitación sean imitadas también por los movimientos reaccionarios americanos, como el Tea Party. (Fuente: Madri+d) […]

Escribe un comentario

Top of Form

[          ] Nombre (requerido)

[          ] Correo electrónico (requerido)

[          ] URL

Tu Comentario 

 

http://www.madrimasd.org/blogs/salud_publica/2011/04/03/132520Bottom of Form

 

 

“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño  

  “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

July 22, 2014

No 710 “EN MI OPINIóN” LUNES, Julio 22, 2014‏‏‏.‏

“IN GOD WE TRUS”   Lázaro R González Miño, Editor. 

“EMO” Estimados amigos, por razones importantes he estado fuera de Miami 4 dias y no he podido publicar nuestro periodico “En mi opinion”. En sintesis lo unico que puedo decir es que cada dia la situacion es peor, que las personas so mas apaticas, que las personas que pueden hacer halgo no hacen nada y que el govierno sigue haciendo la mayor cantidad de  porquerias locamente que puede. Cuando veo esta apatia tan profunda en el pueblo Americano y en los congresistas y representantes del congreso y de los governadores de los estados supuestamente conservadores. Cuando veo a los terroristas de dentro y de fuera haciendose cada vez mas fuertes e impunes y veo a los buenos aceptando la derrota sin ir a la batalla. Me pregunto si ya nada tiene sentido ni solucion.

Lazaro R Gonzalez Mino.

 

JORGE A VILLALON: MUY INTERESANTE

Adiós a la cartaRafael del Pino*

20 de julio de 2014

Este es simplemente el modus operandi, sin un ápice de ética, de los militares en regímenes totalitarios como el de Cuba y autoritarios como el de Rusia 

Con el brutal derribo del vuelo MH17 de Malasyan Airlines sobre el territorio ocupado por las fuerzas separatistas ucranianas, dirigidas, organizadas y armadas por Rusia, se acaba de perpetrar el acto terrorista más terrible del presente año donde han perdido la vida 298 personas inocentes 

Este desastre se veía venir desde las últimas semanas con el incremento de la intervención rusa en los intentos de anexarse una buena parte de Ucrania. Los “rebeldes” derribaron primero un avión caza bombardero SU-25. Posteriormente derriban un avión de transporte AN-26, averían otro cazabombardero SU-25, que logra aterrizar gravemente dañado, y por último se produce la tragedia que estamos presenciando. 

El avión de pasajeros se encontraba volando en ruta de Ámsterdam a Kuala Lumpur, cruzando a una altura de 33.000 pies, lo que lo situaba en el diapasón de efectividad del sofisticado complejo de misiles Buk, también conocido en la OTAN por SA-11 Gadfly (“Tábano”).

A la altitud en que volaba el avión de pasajeros era imposible que pudiera ser alcanzado por los misiles portátiles conocido como Manpads o por fuego de artillería antiaérea, por lo tanto no cabe la menor duda de que fue un complejo de misiles SA-11, que por su complejidad tenían que ser operados por especialistas rusos que se hayan ofrecido “voluntarios” en su “noble y desinteresada ayuda fraternal internacionalista”.

Allá los ilusos o despistados que se crean estas historias. Nosotros los cubanos que fuimos astilla de aquel palo tenemos bastante experiencia en estos trajines. 

No solo a rebeldes improvisados se les hace extremadamente difícil operar estos sistemas. A oficiales profesionales, como los que enviamos a estudiar a la URSS después de la crisis de los misiles nucleares de Octubre de 1961, para que asimilaran los S-75 que nos habían dejado los soviéticos, tardaron tres años para poder operarlos. Y después que ya estaban operándolos no dejaron de cometer errores garrafales como derribar uno de los aviones ejecutivos de Fidel Castro, el Ilushing-14 matricula #1224 a finales de 1965 pereciendo toda la tripulación. Fatal error que se repitió el 27 de abril de 1988 en el aeródromo de Cahama al sur de Angola, cuando un sistema parecido al Buk y operado por cubanos derribó el AN-26 donde viajaban más de 25 altos oficiales cubanos, incluyendo el general de división Francisco Cruz. Igualmente sucedió con un Yak-40 con 29 soviéticos a bordo, derribado por uno de nuestros sistemas S-125 Pechora el 8 de agosto de 1980 próximo al aeródromo de Matala.

O sea, que esta desgracia que acaba de suceder en Ucrania no es nueva para nosotros. Como tampoco fue nuevo el criminal derribo de las indefensas avionetas de Hermanos al Rescate, siguiendo el ejemplo del derribo por la aviación interceptora soviética el 1 de septiembre de 1983 del avión de pasajeros de la aerolínea Korean Airlines en el vuelo KAL007, con 269 personas a bordo. Es simplemente el modus operandi, sin un ápice de ética, de los militares en regímenes totalitarios como el de Cuba y autoritarios como el de Rusia. 

Pero despejemos hasta la última duda de que esta fue una acción deliberada por parte de los “rebeldes” separatistas.

Los periodistas de la Associated Press que cubren el conflicto en el terrero pudieron ver un complejo de misiles Buk como el que acabamos de describir moviéndose en las cercanías del poblado de Snizhne, próximo al lugar del derribo. Pero lo más importante ha sido la intercepción de las radiocomunicaciones de los “rebeldes” separatistas captadas por las unidades de radioescucha de las fuerzas armadas de Ucrania. Esto por supuesto lo hacen todos los países desarrollados o en desarrollo y Ucrania no es la excepción. No sé si los lectores recuerdan como Estados Unidos grabó todas las infamantes radios conversaciones de los pilotos cubanos cuando cometían la masacre de las avionetas de Hermanos al Rescate con sus cazas MiG-29 en febrero de 1996. 

Pero escuchemos las grabaciones realizadas por los servicios de seguridad de Ucrania entre los jefes de las fuerzas “rebeldes”. 

El líder del grupo con el indicativo “Demon” le comunica a su jefe con el indicativo “Miner”: “Hemos acabado de derribar un avión. Cayó en las afueras de Enakievo. Nuestros hombres fueron a verlo y fotografiarlo. Está ardiendo”.

Después que sus hombres inspeccionaron el lugar donde cayó. “Demon” reporta nuevamente: “Kazakhs” (indicativo de la unidad que disparó el misil) en el check point de Chermunkhino fue el que derribó el avión. Se desintegró en el aire… ya encontraron el primer cuerpo. Es un civil. Y continúa: “Quiero decir, es definitivamente un avión civil”. 

Su superior con el indicativo “Greek” le pregunta: ¿Habían muchas personas? 

“Demon” le responde: “Una gran cantidad. Los restos están lloviendo en los patios.”

“Greek pregunta: “¿Qué tipo de avión es?”.

“Demon” responde: “No tengo idea todavía. No he llegado a la sección principal. Solo he estado buscando donde los cuerpos comenzaron a caer. Hay restos de asientos y cuerpos”.

“Greek” pregunta: “¿Algún arma ahí? 

“Demon” dice: “Ninguna, cosas civiles, cosas médicas, toallas, papel sanitario”.

“Greek” pregunta: “¿Algunos documentos?”.

“Demon” contesta: “Sí, un estudiante indonesio de una universidad”.

Creo que con esto y otras revelaciones que continuamente aparecen en la prensa internacional no existe la menor duda de que la mano rusa ha sido la autora de esta masacre. Con esto se explica ahora con más claridad la mansedumbre y sumisión que el general/presidente de Cuba le acaba de rendir a su antigua metrópoli durante la visita de Putin. En el supuesto caso que nos quedara un átomo de duda, ésta se ha desvanecido por completo gracias a la relampagueante e inusual rapidez con que Fidel Castro salió a la palestra mundial; sin siquiera llegar los expertos investigadores internacionales a la región del siniestro, para afirmar que es culpa del gobierno democráticamente electo de Ucrania. Con ello, sabemos ahora ciertamente que fueron los rusos. 

Hace tiempo predije que esta entrega iba a suceder. Pueden remitirse a la página 319 de mi libro en inglés Inside Castro’s Bunker, donde escribí: 

¿Podrá Castro mantener el poder a pesar del colapso económico y la crisis política y social que confronta Cuba? Como decimos los cubanos “el diablo sabe más por viejo que por diablo” y los Castro de tontos no tienen un pelo para no darse cuenta que están sentados sobre una caldera de presión. Saben que la situación actual no podrá prolongarse mucho mas y se lo han jugado todo a una última carta. Resistir lo más que se pueda apoyado en las bayonetas para esperar que se produzca el milagro del retorno a la guerra fría. 

Solo este milagro, que cada día se ve más factible con la agresividad geopolítica de Rusia, podría prolongar el final del régimen.

No precisamente espera Castro el retorno total a la época de la URSS. Difícilmente los comunistas puedan revertir la historia. Castro tiene los pies en la tierra y sabe que la inmensa ola de nacionalismo y chovinismo que hoy envuelve a toda Rusia muy bien pudiera traer en su seno a un nuevo Führer. El gran error de Estados Unidos fue pensar que con la desaparición del comunismo en Rusia, el país se convertiría en un dócil aliado. El comunismo jamás pudo eliminar el orgullo nacionalista de los rusos heredado en cientos de años. Rusia es un gran país, con enormes recursos naturales y con miles de cabezas nucleares. Los rusos lo saben y los Castro también. Este es el milagro al que el régimen cubano se lo ha jugado todo. Si la diminuta bolita en la ruleta de la vida cae por casualidad en la casilla escogida por Castro, entonces el portaaviones natural que Cuba representa volverá a recobrar su valor original y aunque su alquiler no alcance los mismos niveles que en las décadas pasadas, por lo menos le posibilitara sortear lo peor de la crisis y terminar sus días en una apacible cama disfrutando del poder. 

Hasta aquí la traducción del inglés de la pagina 318 de Inside Castro’s Bunker.

Con la conmovedora reconciliación y nueva “Luna de Miel” entre los Castro y sus viejos amos nos surge una nueva interrogante: ¿Será casualidad que cada vez que asoman las tendencias a un relajamiento de las tensiones entre Estados Unidos y Cuba se produzca un hecho traumatizante que hace a los Castro cerrar filas con lo peor del planeta frente a su vecino del norte? 

Por lo pronto con el regreso de los rusos con sus barcos espías, sus aviones de reconocimiento, sus bases de submarinos y hasta su centro de espionaje de Lourdes ha sido el régimen del general/presidente quien acaba de hacer trizas la famosa carta enviada al presidente Obama por destacadas personalidades norteamericanas. Adiós a la carta, que en paz descanse la misiva. 

*El autor fue general de la Fuerza Aérea de Cuba

 

 

EORGINA LOPEZ: ¿Iba la cura del sida en la tragedia del MH17?

Publicado: 19 jul 2014 | 1:11 GMT Última actualización: 20 jul 2014 | 1:16 GMT

La muerte de más de 100 especialistas en el VIH en la tragedia del MH17, hace temer a algunos que la cura del sida pueda haberse perdido en la catástrofe aérea.

Se teme que la cura del sida pueda haberse perdido con los más de 100 científicos e investigadores, “los mejores y más brillantes”, que viajaban a bordo del avión siniestrado al Congreso Internacional sobre Sida de 2014 en Melbourne (Australia), informa el diario británico ‘The Independent‘. El jueves el avión de vuelo MH17 de Malaysia Airlines cayó en la región de de Donetsk en Ucrania con 298 personas a bordo. 

Estas personas eran las mejores y las más brillantes, dedicaron toda su carrera a la lucha contra este terrible virus

Según Trevor Stratton, un especialista canadiense en el VIH, los científicos fallecidos se acercaron mucho a la creación de la vacuna contra el virus. Además, no descarta que la cura del sida estuviera a bordo del avión. “Hay unos estudios muy prometedores que se llevan a cabo desde hace mucho tiempo, y ahora estamos a punto de crear una vacuna, así que podemos hablar del fin de la epidemia del sida en un futuro cercano”, indica el científico. “La cura del sida podía estar en ese avión. ¿Realmente lo estaba? No lo sabemos”.

Actualmente, el comité de la conferencia aclara la lista de los delegados que murieron en la catástrofe, y en su memoria ha decidido no cancelar el encuentro internacional que empieza este domingo. “Estas personas eran las mejores y las más brillantes, dedicaron toda su carrera a la lucha contra este terrible virus”, indica Clive Aspin, un investigador de Australia.

Entre todas las pérdidas, la comunidad científica lamenta especialmente la de Joep Lange, un destacado científico, humanista, el expresidente de la Sociedad Internacional del sida de la Universidad de Amsterdam, que comenzó a estudiar la enfermedad en 1983, cuando el virus comenzó a expandirse por el planeta. Lange, autor de más de 350 artículos, fue una de las figuras clave en varios proyectos para el desarrollo de la terapia antirretroviral para prevenir la transmisión del virus de madre a hijo, que estaba previsto para ser utilizado tanto en los países desarrollados como en desarrollo.

 

 

WESTERN CENTER FOR JOURNALISM…

 “I call upon the leadership of the U.S. House of Representatives… to draft articles of impeachment as no one is above the law in America.”

       After the House of Representatives threatened to take him to court, Obama swaggered to the microphone. With defiance and ridicule in his voice he declared that he’s“not going to apologize” and like a petulant child he issued a challenge to Speaker of the House John Boehner: “So sue me.” 

       The United States Supreme Court just smacked him down, but he doesn’t care. He instructed his minions to “be creative” and find ways to defy Congress and the courts and ram his radical agenda down our throats. 

       Barack Obama’s not backing down… he’s doubling down and we must declare our independence from the Obama Regime. Let’s take our message to the 50 Tea Party Members in Congress and the Republican Leadership and demand that they IMPEACH BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA. 

 Patriotic Americans Are Sick And We’re Tired Of This Criminal Obama Regime.

       If you believe that Barack Obama needs to be removed from office and thrown in jail, rest assured, you haven’t taken leave of your senses or gone off the deep end. You simply recognize the obvious. 

       Our nation is presently in a state of crisis. 

       We’re not dealing with run-of-the-mill government graft and corruption. The stench of lawlessness in the Obama Regime is so overwhelming that it places our country in clear peril of becoming a third-world dictatorship. 

       Yes, we’re living in very dangerous times… desperate times, and desperate times call for desperate measures. 

       As former-Congressman Allen West put it: “Make no mistake, [Barack] Obama is ignoring the Constitution, our laws, and the system of checks and balances that safeguard this country. Barack Obama has exceeded his constitutional authority, which has dangerous implications for our system of government and our freedoms.” 

       Put another way, when things that crawl invade your home, you don’t eradicate them one by one, you call the Orkin man and rid your house of all the vermin en masse. 

Yes… The United States Is Evolving Into A Third-World Country.

       Simply consider the following short list of manufactured Obama crises: 

        The most powerful and feared agency in the federal government targeted political opponents, pursued Members of Congress and allegedly even planned to throw people in jail for daring to exercise their First Amendment rights and oppose the criminal Obama Regime. 

       Veterans died by the hundreds — perhaps by the thousands — as those who were tasked to care for them were paid bonuses for allowing them to die as they waited for much-needed medical care that never came. 

        As the encore to running weapons to dangerous cartels South of the Border (Fast and Furious), the Obama Regime is now allowing hordes of illegal alien children to flood our borders. These children are held in sweltering and stinking hangers and cages so that they may infect each other with diseases, and then bused to all areas of the country to disappear into the populace and spread those diseases and otherwise overwhelm our already sinking social welfare system. 

        Failed Obama foreign policies emboldened enemy nations and terrorists around the world and Barack Obama responded by tasking Eric Holder’s DOJ to secretly pursue journalists who dared to shine the light of day on his foreign policy failures. To make matters worse, Obama’s planning to release even more terrorists from Guantanamo Bay. Make no mistake, the next 9-11 is just around the corner… courtesy of Barack Hussein Obama. 

       These crises are not occurring by accident. They were planned and they are being fueled by a corrupt and criminal regime that is either totally incompetent or is purposefully trying to destroy the United States of America. 

       And to be totally honest, it’s not just the corruption and criminality that drives us crazy, it’s the fact that we’re watching… gobsmacked… as Barack Obama fulfills his lawless 2008 campaign pledge to“fundamentally transform” the United States into a third-world nation, and we’re not about to sit on our duffs and watch the United States become a second-rate nation. 

       Make no mistake, our great nation is in crisis… our great nation is under attack from within and desperate times call for desperate measures andCongress’ response to this crisis must be swift and decisive… people must be removed from office and thrown in jail… and the time to start making that happen is now. 

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership and the 50 Tea Party Members in the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. 

Floyd Brown

 

 

Listen: Former Obama Labor Secretary Caught On Tape Violating This Federal Law

“It is deeply ironic…”

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — JULY 18, 2014

 

House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa is keeping busy investigating the many scandals plaguing the Obama administration. This week, however, he found time to weigh in on a voicemail left by a high-ranking Obama official.

“In March 2012, United States Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, a sitting member of the president’s cabinet, engaged in prohibited activity outlined in the Hatch Act,” Issa said in the opening statement of a recent committee hearing.

He explained that Solis “solicited a donation from a subordinate Labor Department employee,” noting the apparent crime was caught on tape when she left a message on the underling’s phone.

“The committee has come now to have possession of a voicemail,” Issa confirmed, “and I would ask that it be played now.”

The woman on the tape, who identifies herself as Solis, said she was making the call “off the record” to “ask you if you could, um, help us get folks organized to come to a fundraiser that we’re doing to Organizing for America for Obama campaign” coming up later in the week.

She offered the name and phone number of an event organizer, asking for her subordinate’s help in bringing more people to the fundraiser.

“There are a lot of folks that we know that are coming,” she said, “but wanted to ask you if you might help contribute or get other folks to help out.”

While Issa said it is not uncommon for an official to misuse his or her office to further a political cause, the Obama administration has tried to hold itself up as above reproach.

“Hatch Act violations have been a problem under all administrations,” he said. “This makes the claim by this administration that they are doing everything right and should be immune from oversight all the more indefensible.”

He concluded that incidents such as this further belie the claim that Obama would preside over an open and honest federal government.

“It is deeply ironic,” he asserted, “that an administration claiming to be the most transparent ever has resisted oversight of its political office and offered less corroboration than its predecessors.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/former-obama-labor-secretary-caught-tape-violating-federal-law/#tbkSsdQGVIdc6VFs.99

 

 

Exclusive: After What This AZ Sheriff Just Said, The Federal Government Better Not Mess With Him

“There’s a lot of confusion…”

TOM HINCHEY — 

Hundreds of people gathered at a remote desert location in Oracle, Arizona, early Tuesday to both protest and support the delivery of 40 to 60 illegal immigrant children to Sycamore Canyon Academy in the Catalina Mountains.  A press release had been circulated over the weekend that stated that the Department of Homeland Security would be off-loading unaccompanied minors in Pinal County.  Yet as the day wore on, it became apparent that the buses were not coming.

The Sheriff spoke with reporters at the intersection of Mt. Lemon and Webb Road near the boys’ ranch.

“These unaccompanied juveniles should be put on planes and returned to their country of origin and reunited with their families,” Babeu said.

When asked if he has been working with DHS, Sheriff Babeu said that he had been attempting to reach Jeh Johnson and other top officials by fax, email, and phone.

“There’s a lot of confusion,” Babeu continued. “Even here in Arizona.”

Babeu was told on Tuesday that the unaccompanied immigrants were not coming to the ranch.

“Who’s running this operation?” he asked rhetorically.  “This is where I am not only upset, I’m insulted by the lack of cooperation by the Federal Government.”

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/sheriff-babeu-im-insulted-lack-cooperation-federal-government/#f7iI05t1zVK0ThA2.99

 

 

 

 

WAYNE ALLYN ROOT: OBAMA’S MURDERING THE MIDDLE CLASS

By: Teresa Mull

Wayne Allyn Root, author, businessman, and politician, says in his new book, The Murder of the Middle Class: How to Save Yourself and Your Family from the Criminal Conspiracy of the Century (Regnery, July 2014) that the middle class is dying, and it’s “not from natural causes.” Root spoke to Human Events about President Obama’s plan to destroy our country, his process, and what to do about it.

You’ve been outspoken in calling for President Obama’s impeachment. Pat Buchanan recently wrote an article in which he says impeachment is “a bridge too far,” and that we have no grounds. What’s your response? 

I’m shocked, absolutely shocked. He’s trying to be too technical. The grounds that I use are the Kevin Trudeau grounds, famous infomercial pitch man on TV. Trudeau is now serving ten years in prison because he sold a $30 book to a million people. The book was a weight loss book and it basically intended you to believe that losing weight is easy, and then when you opened it, you found out it’s not easy, it’s a low calorie diet that will starve you. So [the U.S. government] claimed Trudeau committed fraud because if he told you the truth, you wouldn’t have bought [the book].

So that’s fraud, ten years in prison. Barack Obama should be convicted for fraud and misrepresentation on Obamacare. What did he do? He told us all how easy it was and how cheap it was, and it wouldn’t cost anybody anything, and he was lying through his teeth the entire time. If he told us the truth, that the middle class would be murdered, and your bills would be double or triple, nobody would have bought it, nobody would have elected him. I lost my own health insurance. It’s going to happen to everybody, and Obama promised it wouldn’t. That’s the crime, that’s the theft, that’s the criminal conspiracy I’m talking about.

Obama did the same thing as Kevin Trudeau. Pat Buchanan’s not getting it. Why do we treat a politician differently from a private sector CEO? Obama lied to 317 million people, and what he did is so monstrous compared to what Trudeau did. Obama has doubled and tripled the health insurance of every person in America. It could be the first trillion dollar theft in the history of the world. He probably cost us a trillion dollars over the next ten years. Everybody’s rates are doubled and tripled and quadrupled in order to pay for thirty million of his voters to get free healthcare. How is that not fraud? It absolutely is.

Let’s take it a step further. How many people have cancer and have lost their insurance or their doctor? I just got the letter in the mail last Friday, my insurance: cancelled: for my family of six. You tell me if I were dying of cancer, how would I take that letter? I might die right away. The stress might kill me. Therefore, Barack Obama has done more than commit fraud, he’s committed manslaughter. Not murder, it’s not premeditated murder, let’s assume it’s involuntary manslaughter.

Pat Buchanan is so far off; he’s not understanding. He’s looking at Benghazi, he’s looking at the IRS, and he’s saying officially, Washington, D.C. would say we don’t have the proof yet. But everyone has the proof that Obamacare was a rip off. We’ve all gotten the notice in the mail. Pretty much everyone knows now that Obama lied about everything.

When Obama campaigned in 2008, he said, because of Obamacare, the price [of health insurance] will go down $2,500 a year per family. But instead, it went up $3,000 per family, per year. That was before Obamacare even started. That was just his first term. Then Obamacare started, and in the first few months of Obamacare, the price actually went up on average more for health insurance benefits for middle class Americans than in the eight years previous combined. Is that not fraud? That’s a crime perpetrated on the American people.

Obama’s the greatest scam artist in the history of the world. He’s lied to everybody again and again.

What’s Obama’s motive since he’s not risking another election?

I said from the beginning, if he’s re-elected, we’re in big trouble, because he never has to face the voters again. He isn’t going to care; he doesn’t have to worry about popular opinion, he’ll just finish the job of destroying America. And that’s exactly what he’s doing. People don’t get it. There’s a lot of nice people, salt of the earth, they just always assume everybody’s got positive motives in life. I know very few people have positive motives in life. It’s all their own agenda. Barack Obama does not have any positive motive. His agenda is to destroy the United States of America. He hates American exceptionalism, he hates patriotism, he hates capitalism, he hates small business, he hates independent contractors which are the heart of America and create all the jobs, and he hates Judeo-Christian values, and he’s doing his best to wipe them all out.

He’s using a specific plan that he and I learned at Columbia. I graduated the same class as he did, Columbia University, class of ’83. He and I were in the same class together, studied all the same things. We studied Cloward and Piven, two Columbia professors. They said the only way to ruin America is not from the outside; it’s got to be from the inside. Take over the White House, take over politics, take over the Senate, take over the House, and we’ve got to put radicals in office who overwhelm the system, who destroy the country with spending, entitlements, and debt, mostly welfare and food stamps. And guess what’s happening right now? That’s it! That’s what’s happening. Spending, entitlements, debt, taxes, and regulation: the five things that every Communist country uses to destroy its people. That’s what Barack Obama is doing to America, and I learned it at Columbia.

Either Barack Obama is the most ignorant, stupid man who’s ever been in the White House, a total incompetent clown, or he’s the most brilliant man who’s ever been in the White House. Don’t get mad at me because I call him a Communist, because I’m saying he’s brilliant. He’s doing a damn good job of ruining America. I’m giving him credit for being brilliant. If you want to call him an idiot, that’s the only other choice, because if anyone intended to help America doing what Obama’s done and producing the results he’s done, he’s the biggest idiot who’s ever stepped foot in the White House. It’s only one or the other, look at the results. I’m giving him credit.

If the GOP wins the Senate back in 2014 this fall, do you think things will turn around or are we too far gone?

I have mixed feelings. Here’s the problem I have: The Republican Party, which is the only vehicle which can save America at this point. The Libertarian Party is incapable of winning a single election. I want to win, so I’m fighting from within the Republican Party. The problem is, when you look at the Mississippi election that just happened, Thad Cochran won in a primary after forty years in the Senate. He beat Chris McDaniel who was the Tea Party candidate. Chris stands for Tea Party values, simply spending less before the country goes bankrupt, and Cochran campaigned like a liberal Democrat, like a socialist. He beat McDaniel by convincing Democratic voters who have never voted for a Republican in their entire life in the deepest urban areas of Mississippi to cross party lines and vote Republican because he said, ‘vote for me, because I’ll protect your welfare and your food stamps and all the government spending I bring back to Mississippi.’

If that’s the argument of Republicans, then we’re too far gone.

I may in fact run, I’m not promising it yet or officially declaring, but I’m thinking really seriously about running against Harry Reid for the United States senate in 2016. I’d love to take down the senate majority leader, because I think he’s the second most responsible person in America for all the bad things that have happened. He’s protected Obama’s rear guard the entire six years Obama’s been president. He is the biggest problem in America besides Obama himself. The point is, if you win the senate, but the people who get elected are as liberal, big government as most Democrats, what have you gained? If Thad Cochrans are elected, we’ve done nothing, we’ve gained nothing. If you elect Tea Party candidates, which is what I proudly will call myself, a Tea Party conservative, then you’ve got a shot. We have to keep fighting for good candidates, not just any candidate.

My book talks about how you win elections. We need to find salesmen and saleswomen because our message is so much harder to sell than the Democratic Party’s message. Obama’s message is: if he were a parent, this is how he’d talk to his kids: “We’re having candy for breakfast, candy for lunch, candy for dessert at night, you don’t have to brush your teeth, we’re never going to a dentist, and tomorrow, skip school and watch cartoons all day. And the Republican message is: Go to school, study hard, get there early, stay late, and eat your broccoli all day long. And we’re going to go to the dentist and you need braces. Guess what? Most people don’t want to hear that message, but in the long run, it’s great for your life. We’re the party of broccoli and Obama’s the party of chocolate. We have a much harder message to sell, so we have to have world class salesmen and saleswomen to sell the message.

Who is a world class salesman? Ronald Reagan. He was an actor and an entertainer and a communicator. So I think the mistake of the Republican Party is that they’ve spent the last thirty years looking for a guy with Reagan’s views when they should have spent the time looking for a candidate with Reagan’s ability to sell and brand and entertain.

Do you have anyone in mind?

There are good salesmen out there. Let me tell you about some of my favorites: I like Dr. Ben Carson. I think he’s interesting because he’s a brilliant neurosurgeon and we’ve never had someone like that run for office. I think he makes the case as a black American to the minority community that they’re willing to listen to. I watched him on the View, and he actually stumped Whoopi Goldberg. He had her speechless. She didn’t know what to say, and they respected him so much, being this genius African American neurosurgeon, and they can’t call him a racist. He wins arguments for us that we, as fellow Republicans, can’t really win with the minority community. We’ve got to get minority votes. We have to get Hispanic votes, black votes, gay votes, female votes. We’ve got to get out there and fight for all of them.

You don’t have to break your principles to get them. I don’t want to do what Thad Cochran did. I tell this story in my book: When I was 21 years old, the Republican Party of New York asked me to run for West Chester County legislator. I ran against a woman who had never lost a race in her whole life, and since then, has never lost a race. She was in a district that was black and Jewish, all Democrat. In all the years before and all the years since, I gave her her closest margin of victory. What I did was walked door to door to every house in the district, including every black housing project in the most dangerous areas of New Rochelle, New York. And I did well.

My point to you is, you don’t need to bend your principles to get those votes. You just need to show up. I don’t think Republicans ever show up in [these] communities and make their case, and I think if we do, we can win elections. If you find a good salesman who is charismatic and who looks good and speaks the language of the people.

Do you think that we can ever recover from the way our nation is now?

We’re in a lot of trouble. It’s a very difficult road to hoe, and the people we elect, for the most part, sell out the minute they get there, and that’s the problem. They claim they’re for the people, but the minute they get elected, it’s about the next election, they’re making fundraising calls.

Can you turn around the American economy with people like that? Who don’t care about small business and don’t care about middle class people? We better get an entire U.S. Senate and House of Ted Cruzes. That is my example of a perfect United States senator: Ted Cruz. Rand Paul is another great example. I don’t always agree on everything Rand Paul says, but I still think all in all, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, and Marco Rubio, who are the Tea Party coalition of the Senate, are as close as we get to the kind of senators that could save America. If you had a Senate majority of those four, you could actually have a chance of saving America. Short of that, you’re not going to save America. We’re drifting into, if not Communism, then Socialist-light, Greece, Italy, France territory.

Are you optimistic that people will start to realize what’s going on and start voting for better candidates? Obama’s approval ratings keep getting worse and he’s been named ‘the worst president in modern history.’ Do you think middle class people will wake up and see why they’ve been struggling so much and put the two and two together?

Here’s the problem: First of all, we’ve had generations of people being dumbed-down in schools. They don’t even know what Communism is. They don’t know what socialism is. They don’t know what they’re looking at.  Are they all starting to sour on Obama? Yes. Even the black community is starting to sour on Obama over the southern border issue. They’re angry that he’s spending money on illegals that should be spent on the inner cities that are filled with black Americans living in complete poverty and being tortured with crime, and they’re saying, ‘why aren’t you spending the money on us?’

Will they then turn around and vote for a Republican? Doubtful. They’ll turn around and vote for Hillary Clinton, thinking that’s different. And she’s not different from Obama. And I don’t even think Hillary’s going to get the nomination. If I had to bet right now, I’d put my money on Elizabeth Warren, and she’s even more liberal than Hillary.

Reagan turned around Jimmy Carter’s great depression. He created twenty million jobs in two years. What did he do? He simply took power away from the government. He starved the government, and instead gave the power back to the people. He cut taxes from 70 percent to 20 percent. I have a plan I call “Reagan with Steroids.” It is the same idea as Reagan: starve the government, take the money away from the government, and give it to the people: create all the jobs, small business. How do you do that? A one year, national income tax vacation. For one year, you jumpstart the economy. The way you shock the economy is to let people keep their own money.

Another point I make in my book is, how did the Seattle Seahawks win the Super Bowl? The 12th man. The 12th man are the fans in the stands. They’re so loyal in Seattle. What does Seattle do? They reward their fans. They honor them. That’s what all smart business people do. They reward their best customers. The Republican Party is full of idiots and morons, because the Tea Party is their biggest fan.  My book recommends treating the Tea Party like a 12th man, and honoring them and rewarding them and loving them, and try to do a few things and make them happy every once and while, and then going out and converting great conservative candidates with Reagan’s views but also with Reagan’s smile, Reagan’s personality, Reagan’s charisma, Reagan’s comedic ability.

What do we risk by doing nothing?

The murder of the middle class is happening every day, in every single way. Obama needed to increase your premiums and to increase your taxes so that you would go broke or be needing a government check. Then at that point, he’s got you, like a drug dealer has an addict. You need the check, you’re going to vote Democrat. The new jobs report came out, and if you heard it all over the news, it’s such a good report. 288,000 jobs created. You know what the real number is? 525,000 full time jobs lost in the month of June. 800,000 part time jobs gained. Minimum wage and low wage jobs are the only things created by this president. If he were a white Republican and he produced results like that, and he produced black unemployment double that of white unemployment, there would be screams for him to go to prison. There would be screams for impeachment coming from the black community. His career would be over. All he’s looking to do is destroy America, and you’re just road kill along the way.

 

 

 

 

Jorge A Villalon: This is a synopsis of the events leading to Putin’s position now, and once again is due to Obama’s weakness as a World Leader. Stratfor is a Global leader in intelligence advising  numerous countries and global companies.

 

Analysis

Editor’s Note: As Stratfor readies to look forward in coming days at the implications for Russia — and its leader Vladimir Putin — in the downing July 17 of a Malaysian jetliner, we also invite readers to take stock with us of past forecasts of Russia’s geopolitical evolution in the context of global events. Stratfor Chairman George Friedman will examine the likelihood of Putin’s undoing in the next issue of Geopolitical Weekly, to publish July 22. Accordingly, we look back here at 1998, when we predicted the unfolding Kosovo crisis would be the undoing of late Russian President Boris Yeltsin. We share our assessment from 2000, when we assessed how newly elected President Putin was rapidly consolidating absolute power. In 2005, Stratfor reassessed Putin’s situation after his first presidential term and laid out how his leadership would begin to reverse the tide of concessions and reassert Russia’s role in line with historical cycles — including the forging of strategic relationships with countries such as Germany. In 2008, we looked at how Russia would capitalize on American weaknesses, including the fatigue of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2011, we foresaw the next stage, as Russia moved to solidify its sphere of influence while still able. In this forecast, we saw the events setting the stage for today’s crisis in Ukraine. Now, we foresee more historical change. We offer this chronology of forecasts in advance of our next report on Russia’s future.

Kosovo Crisis Sets Template for New Russian Politics

During the Kosovo crisis, as Russian politicians rallied to challenge NATO intervention in Serbia and found a new source of unity, then-Russian President Boris Yeltsin found himself isolated.

Oct. 15, 1998: One voice that has been relatively weak has been that of embattled Russian President Boris Yeltsin. Though he declared his firm opposition to NATO strikes on October 9, Russia’s nationalists and communists have claimed that weak Yeltsin leadership allowed the U.S. and the West to assert hegemony. Yeltsin is even losing control of national policy regarding Kosovo. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Yakushkin was forced to rebut Defense Ministry statements on the issue, claiming only Yeltsin and the Foreign Ministry could make official policy. Kosovo may be Yeltsin’s undoing, as it has united and revitalized his opponents.

In Russia, Putin’s Power Almost Absolute

Following Boris Yeltsin’s December 1999 resignation, Vladimir Putin became acting president and then president in 2000.

Dec. 27, 2001: Two allies of Russian President Vladimir Putin joined Russia’s most influential business lobby on Dec. 21. That was followed by a live, national call-in program Dec. 24 — broadcast via television, radio and Internet — in which Putin fielded questions from his countrymen for 2 1/2 hours. Taken together, these events signal Putin has nearly finished consolidating his economic, political and social control and is now better positioned to hammer the few resistant elements into line. With newfound political stability, the president will set about implementing reforms passed in 2001 and begin crafting a new raft of reforms in 2002.

Former Soviet Union Net Assessment 2005: Unilateral Concessions to the West Are Over, Reaction Has Begun

July 15, 2005: In this era, there have been two different phases. The first — a phase of outright geopolitical retreat by Russia and the FSU’s other states, with no real attempts to resist outside powers’ strategic penetration — started in 1991 and appears to have ended by 2004 or 2005 at the latest. Currently, the second phase is starting, as regional powers — led by Russia — begin a strategic response to the recent decline and to outside powers’ increasing influence. The attempts to reverse the tide started after Russian President Vladimir Putin was re-elected for his second term last year.

Russia and Rotating the U.S. Focus

With the United States entangled in wars in the Middle East and South Asia:

April 1, 2008: Russia has taken advantage of the imbalance in the U.S. politico-military posture to attempt to re-establish its sphere of influence in the former Soviet Union. To this end, Russia has taken advantage of its enhanced financial position — due to soaring commodity prices, particularly in the energy sector — as well as a lack of American options in the region.

Russia: Rebuilding an Empire While It Can

Oct. 31, 2011: U.S.-Russian relations seem to have been relatively quiet recently, as there are numerous contradictory views in Washington about the true nature of Russia’s current foreign policy. Doubts remain about the sincerity of the U.S. State Department’s so-called “reset” of relations with Russia — the term used in 2009 when U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton handed a reset button to her Russian counterpart as a symbol of a freeze on escalating tensions between Moscow and Washington. The concern is whether the “reset” is truly a shift in relations between the two former adversaries or simply a respite before relations deteriorate again.

 

 

 

AMENPER: La intocabilidad de la Presidencia DE obama…

Cuando George Bush estaba en la oficina, los liberales regularmente lo compararon a Hitler, especulado que estaba detrás de 9/11, fantaseado con asesinarle y generalmente se hablaba de él como que él era el hijo de Satanás.

Esto fue llamado “decir la verdad al poder”.

 Luego Barack Obama llegó a oficina de la presidencia e irónicamente, la disidencia con el presidente ya no es tan patriótica.

Estas mismas personas se volvieron gruñones enojados, no aceptan el sentido del humor ahora consideran  que el Presidente de Estados Unidos está  más allá de la crítica.

Por supuesto, la verdad es que no han cambiado en absoluto; son sólo hipócritas.

Si quieres ver cuán hipócrita y muy sensible a la crítica se han vuelto que se puede, aquí están algunos ejemplos.

En el desfile del 4 De julio, un hombre fue acusado de desacato a la Presidencia debido a una carroza con una letrina con el rótulo “la biblioteca de Obama”

Un payaso de un rodeo fue despedido simplemente por disfrazarse como Obama.  El no tuvo la culpa que el público aplaudiera cuando lo atacó el toro.

Un sargento de los marines escribió en el internet, no voy a obedecer más a Obama al carajo con sus órdenes.  Fue juzgado por desacato a la presidencia. El sargento Gary Stein aclaró más tarde sus observaciones para decir que no sigue las órdenes ilegales del Presidente y discutió que sus comentarios en línea estaban protegidos por la primera enmienda

 

Y que hay de los hechos que han ocurridos durante la administración. No se pueden criticar sin “ofender a la presidencia” según Obama estas son crisis inventadas por la oposición.

Pero no son invenciones son hechos.

 

Rápido y furioso, nombrado por una espurio investigación federal de tráfico de armas que comenzó en Arizona en 2009, Fast and Furious inquietantemente presagió temas que echaban sombras ominosas sobre reelección de Obama, pero fueron ignoradas, no se pueden tocar los intocables, es puro racismo.

El impopular Obamacare se implementa mediante orden ejecutiva sin consultar al congreso.

Encubrimiento del gobierno de los atentados contra un Consulado estadounidense en Libia que mató a cuatro estadounidenses.

El Departamento de justicia obtuvo en secreto los registros telefónicos de los periodistas de Associated Press (AP)

El servicio de ingresos internos (IRS) admitió que se aplicó un examen adicional a grupos conservadores al solicitar la exención de impuestos

Jihadistas están ocupando a Irak después de retirar las tropas.

Aumenta el malestar en Afganistán

Putin agarra Crimea y ahora está tratando de apoderarse de Ucrania.

Frontera mexicana es como un grifo dañado que no se puede cerrar, miles de inmigrantes ilegales entran al país.

Un avión comercial  fue derribado en la frontera entre Ucrania y Rusia con un misil que solamente tiene Rusia. Había 23 pasajeros americanos.  Pero este presidente dice que no se puede determinar que Rusia tuvo algo que ver.

Reabren la base Rusa en Cuba, y el tráfico de armas a Corea del Norte es descubierto en Panamá, pero no pasa nada.

Israel invade Gaza para destruir la infraestructura de Hamas que está atacando al país. Pero el presidente lo único que se le ocurre es decir a Israel es que tenga templanza. 

Bueno pero es que si tienen templanza se los tiemplan.

 

Pero no se puede criticar, porque hay que proteger el legado del primer presidente negro para la posteridad..

La Nueva percepción de América en el Mundo

La política exterior entreguista de esta administración de liderar desde atrás, no se limita solamente a la debilidad en Irán y Corea del Norte y sus armas nucleares, ni al resurgimiento del poder de los terroristas en el Medio Oriente. La debilidad llega hasta nuestras costas.

Un buque de carga cuyas andanzas misteriosas sugieren el tráfico ilícito de armas de contrabando cerca de costas de Estados Unidos demuestra que Corea del norte no necesita los misiles para amenazar a América —

En un escrito en la revista Forbes, Claudia Rosett de la Fundación para la defensa de las democracias saca a la luz que un carguero con bandera de Corea del norte Mu Du Bong, a finales de junio, llama a Cuba, luego desaparecido de la red de transporte comercial por más de una semana-

Reaparece en la Habana el 10 de julio, la última posición detectada fue en el Golfo de México, no tan lejos de la costa de Texas.”

La Sra. Rosett cita “inquietantes similitudes” con otro carguero norcoreano Chong Chon, que fue capturado el verano pasado violando las sanciones de las Naciones Unidas sobre Corea del norte tratando de pasar contrabando a través del Canal de Panamá con una carga ilícita de armas que habían recogido en Cuba. Llevaba 240 toneladas de armas y pertrechos, incluyendo dos cazas MiG-21, componentes de sistema de misiles tierra-aire, y municiones de la visión nocturna” — todos ocultos por más de 200.000 sacos de azúcar cubano.”

Rosett dice que Estados Unidos podría imponer sus propias sanciones a los buques norcoreanos en general. Pero la verdadera lección aquí es la necesidad de una mayor vigilancia de Estados Unidos contra tales amenazas cerca de sus costas, especialmente mientras el régimen de Castro da la bienvenida a Corea del norte en sus puertos.

Pero lo que oímos por demasiados legisladores de ambos partidos, es la reanudación de relaciones con Cuba y el levantamiento del embargo.

¿Cómo entonces vamos a pensar que este gobierno podría imponer sanciones a Cuba como sugiere la Sra. Rosett?  -Creo que ella lo sabe, pero quiere simplemente presentar el punto que fuera algo que se hubiera hecho en cualquier administración anterior.

La debilidad de esta administración, ya sea por incompetencia o por diseño desconocido, es conocida de nuestros enemigos. 

Del país que respetaba el mundo, nos hemos convertidos como unos monos de circo de los que todos se ríen.

Costará años y una política exterior con un giro de 180 grados a una administración, recuperar la condición de Estados Unidos como líder del mundo libre.

 

Exclusive: After What This AZ Sheriff Just Said, The Federal Government Better Not Mess With Him

“There’s a lot of confusion…”

TOM HINCHEY — 

Hundreds of people gathered at a remote desert location in Oracle, Arizona, early Tuesday to both protest and support the delivery of 40 to 60 illegal immigrant children to Sycamore Canyon Academy in the Catalina Mountains.  A press release had been circulated over the weekend that stated that the Department of Homeland Security would be off-loading unaccompanied minors in Pinal County.  Yet as the day wore on, it became apparent that the buses were not coming.

The Sheriff spoke with reporters at the intersection of Mt. Lemon and Webb Road near the boys’ ranch.

“These unaccompanied juveniles should be put on planes and returned to their country of origin and reunited with their families,” Babeu said.

When asked if he has been working with DHS, Sheriff Babeu said that he had been attempting to reach Jeh Johnson and other top officials by fax, email, and phone.

“There’s a lot of confusion,” Babeu continued. “Even here in Arizona.”

Babeu was told on Tuesday that the unaccompanied immigrants were not coming to the ranch.

“Who’s running this operation?” he asked rhetorically.  “This is where I am not only upset, I’m insulted by the lack of cooperation by the Federal Government.”

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/sheriff-babeu-im-insulted-lack-cooperation-federal-government/#l2VI9cZuvTO6kqTb.99

 

Fue Cesanteada Del Comité Investigador De Watergate

Por Introducir PRUEBAS FALSAS Contra Nixon…Hillary Fired For “Lying, Unethical Behavior” on Watergate Committee  Robert Gehl, January 12, 2014 | 417 comments

http://downtrend.com/robertgehl/while-on-watergate-committee-hillary-was-fired-for-lying-unethical-behavior/

Hillary Clinton might have a pretty hefty scandal brewing.
It turns when she was an attorney working on the Watergate investigation, she was fired by her supervisor for “lying, unethical behavior.”
Jerry Zeifman, who said he is a lifelong Democrat, was a supervisor for 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. When the investigation was complete, Zeifman said he fired Hillary and refused to give her a recommendation.
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.
Dan Calabrese reports:
How could a 27-year-old House staff member do all that? She couldn’t do it by herself, but Zeifman said she was one of several individuals – including Marshall, special counsel John Doar and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum – who engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation. 

Why would they want to do that? Because, according to Zeifman, they feared putting Watergate break-in mastermind E. Howard Hunt on the stand to be cross-examined by counsel to the president. Hunt, Zeifman said, had the goods on nefarious activities in the Kennedy Administration that would have made Watergate look like a day at the beach – including Kennedy’s purported complicity in the attempted assassination of Fidel Castro.
The actions of Hillary and her cohorts went directly against the judgment of top Democrats, up to and including then-House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill, that Nixon clearly had the right to counsel. Zeifman says that Hillary, along with Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar, was determined to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon. And in order to pull this off, Zeifman says Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception.
The brief involved precedent for representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding. When Hillary endeavored to write a legal brief arguing there is no right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding, Zeifman says, he told Hillary about the case of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who faced an impeachment attempt in 1970.
“As soon as the impeachment resolutions were introduced by (then-House Minority Leader Gerald) Ford, and they were referred to the House Judiciary Committee, the first thing Douglas did was hire himself a lawyer,” Zeifman said.
The Judiciary Committee allowed Douglas to keep counsel, thus establishing the precedent. Zeifman says he told Hillary that all the documents establishing this fact were in the Judiciary Committee’s public files. So what did Hillary do?
“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.
The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Of course, Nixon’s resignation rendered the entire issue moot, ending Hillary’s career on the Judiciary Committee staff in a most undistinguished manner. Zeifman says he was urged by top committee members to keep a diary of everything that was happening. He did so, and still has the diary if anyone wants to check the veracity of his story. Certainly, he could not have known in 1974 that diary entries about a young lawyer named Hillary Rodham would be of interest to anyone 34 years later.

 

From: Amelia  <>
 

Conservative Tribune

http://conservativetribune.com/how-hillary-got-fired/

 

REPORT: Hillary Was Fired From Watergate Committee for “Fraud” and “Lying”

 

Former First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is no stranger to scandal. Unfortunately, as most Americans agree, she does appear to be a stranger to honesty.

Public figures from Senator Rand Paul to NFL great Terry Bradshaw have called Hillary out for her lies to the American people. No wonder students are demanding that she return herspeaking fees despite her claims to have been broke when the Clintons left the White House–they don’t believe her. They’re in good company–neither does her own uncle.

Hillary’s past is also full of examples of her disregard for the truth. Previous reports have shown her willingness as a criminal defense attorney to ignore the facts–or more accurately, to subvert them–in order to put an accused and potentially dangerous child rapist back on the streets.

Now a bombshell book reveals that Hillary was fired by Democrat attorney Jerry Zeifman for fraud, lies, and obstruction of justice during her time as a lawyer working for the House Judiciary Committee.

Quoted by the weaselzippers website:

 

Hillary Clinton might be hoping no one buys “Nixon’s Secrets” — Roger Stone’s new book marking the 40th anniversary of the Watergate scandal.

Stone — a Nixon staffer who is so partisan he has a tattoo of his old boss’ face on his back — reports that Clinton was fired as a staff lawyer for the House of Representatives’ Judiciary Committee for “writing fraudulent legal briefs, lying to investigators and confiscating public documents.”

Yale Law School grad Clinton was 26 in 1974 when she started working for the committee that was investigating whether or not there was enough evidence to impeach or prosecute President Nixon for the Watergate affair.

Clinton’s boss, Jerry Zeifman, the general counsel and chief of staff to the Watergate Committee, claims he fired her because she was working to impede the investigation and undermine Nixon’s defense.

People have pasts, and every criminal defense lawyer is certain to have worked with someunsavory individuals and, moreover, to have done their job defending those criminals, even getting them freed due to legal technicalities.

But there’s a world of difference between taking advantage of legal loopholes on a defendant’s behalf and lying to the public, particularly when those lies involve a matter as significant as the possible impeachment of a sitting president.

Hillary Clinton’s record speaks for itself. Her forty-year history of blatant disregard for the truth in the name of her own political objectives should categorically preclude her from ever holding public office again. The American people deserve better.

In fact, they deserve to see her prosecuted.

 

Please share this article on Facebook and Twitter if you agree that Hillary Clinton lacks the moral character that should be a requirement of every elected official.

http://ammoindependence.com/html/vsl2/index15060.html

 

 

“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño  

  “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

EN MI OPINION

July 15, 2014

No 708 “EN MI OPINIóN” Martes, Julio 15, 2014‏‏‏

 “IN GOD WE TRUS”   Editor   Lázaro R González Miño

Mensaje de Ronald Reagan.

Es MAGNIFICO.

This is a rather short video that we all should watch, appreciate, and fully understand its meaning.  It is also one that everyone in our government    

should be forced to watch several times, at least until they get it

http://www.youtube.com/embed/OvN1jTkzXbY?rel=0

 

 

What Joan Rivers Just Said About Michelle’s Sexuality Is So Crazy You Won’t Believe It

“You know that Michelle is a…”

TOM HINCHEY — JULY 7, 2014

A street reporter asked Joan Rivers if the country will ever see a gay president.

The 81-year-old comedienne said, “We already have it with Obama. So, let’s just calm down.”

Then she went on to say, “You know that Michelle is a tranny.”  The reporter asked for clarification. Rivers repeated herself, “A transgender. We all know.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/joan-rivers-says-barack-gay-michelle-tranny/#HPcWWvI1RheAw7Kb.99

 

 

AMENPER: ¿Qué será lo que tiene Obama?

Nuevas revelaciones, que siguen viniendo a cuentagotas, sugieren que Lois Lerner podría haber conspirado para obstruir la justicia en los esfuerzos de su agencia para atacar indebidamente los opositores conservadores de la administración Obama.

La Sra. Lerner es el ex jefe de la división de organizaciones exentas del IRS.

Varios grupos conservadores han señalado que sus derechos de primera enmienda han sido violados. Y un nuevo correo electrónico publicado esta semana muestra que, justo cuando el escándalo se hizo público la Sr. Lerner, advirtió a los empleados a “ser cuidadosos acerca de lo que decimos en los correos electrónicos” porque dichas comunicaciones podrían terminar ante el Congreso.

Peor aún, el correo electrónico, de fecha 09 de abril de 2013, sugiere que el IRS pensó que podría emplear de mensajería instantánea como un desvío para subvertir las leyes de registros abiertos.

Si pareamos este nuevo desarrollo con afirmaciones fantásticas del IRS de desplomes del disco duro que por casualidad le pasó a las computadoras de los directores de este escándalo, convenientemente paralelo a la cronología del escándalo, el hedor es ahora dominante.

Por lo tanto, un escándalo que gritaba hace mucho tiempo por el nombramiento de un fiscal especial ahora está aullando como un lobo herido pidiendo auxilio.

No investigar propiamente al IRS (ahora bajo orden de un juez federal de decir la verdad) en lo que parece ser la definición de una empresa criminal corrupta sólo puede conducir a la gente razonable concluir que la empresa no se limita al IRS.

La administración de Obama hizo una gestión amañada cuando nombró una investigadora interna que resultó ser parte de la oficina de Bárbara Bóxer una de las legisladoras más cerca de Obama.

Si esto no es una conspiración, que venga Dios y lo vea.

Un encubrimiento tan evidente, sólo puede enseñarnos que la profundidad de este asunto va más allá de las oficinas del IRS.

Entendemos que una impugnación de un presidente, sólo ha sucedido dos veces en la historia de la nación, cuando Andrew Johnson y con Bill Clinton. Los dos a pesar de la impopularidad en el caso de Johnson entre demócratas que lo consideraban un traidor por haberse pasado al norte y haber sido el vicepresidente con Lincoln, y entre republicanos radicales, por ser sureño y demócrata, y no pudo ser destituido en el juicio de impugnación. 

Bill Clinton cometió un perjurio flagrante en el congreso, era probado y conocido hasta por el más ignorante ciudadano, y tampoco pudo ser destituido en el juicio de impugnación. 

Sin lugar a dudas Obama podría sobrevivir por tradición el juicio de impugnación, más que nada para que no quedara en la historia que el primer presidente negro había sido el primer presidente destituido en un juicio de impugnación.

Pero Obama, mucho más que Johnson y Clinton, es un presidente que debiera de ser impugnado.

Hay más caca en Obama que en Johnson y Clinton juntos. Entonces, ¿por qué no se impugna a Obama? ¿Qué será lo que tiene Obama?..

 Obama tiene a su favor que tiene las condiciónes de más valor en esta nueva sociedad, tiene el gran mérito de ser medio negro.y musulmán.

 

 

SAMITIER: Tres Presidentes En El Pasado Deportaron Millones De Ilegales … Si Se Pudo Hacer Hace Mas De 70 Años…

¿Por qué No Podemos Hacerlo Ahora?

He aquí la Historia:

 

Three Presidents

 No one in either party has the courage to do this today.

hat did Presidents Hoover, Truman, and Eisenhower have in common? 

(This is something that should be of great interest for you to pass around. I didn’t know of this until it was pointed out to me.) 

Back during the great depression, Herbert Hoover ordered the deportation of ALL illegal aliens in order to make jobs available to American citizens that desperately needed work. 

Harry Truman deported over two million illegal aliens after WWII to create jobs for returning veterans. 

In 1954 Dwight Eisenhower deported 13 million illegal Mexicans. The program was called Operation Wetback. It was done so WWII and Korean War veterans would have a better chance at jobs. It took two years, but they deported them! 

Now, if they could deport the illegal aliens back then, they could surely do it today. If you have doubts about the veracity of this information, enter Operation Wetback into your favorite search engine and confirm it for yourself. 

Why, you might ask, can’t they do this today? Actually the answer is quite simple. Hoover , Truman, and Eisenhower were men of honor, not untrustworthy politicians looking for votes! 

And Reminder: Don’t forget to pay your taxes – 12 to 20 million illegal aliens – are depending on it.

THE NEWS MEDIA AND THE DEMOCRATS ALL SAY THAT IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO DEPORT ALL THE  ILLEGAL  IMMIGRANTS WHICH IS A BIG LIE, AND THEY KNOW IT Make sure this gets passed on.

Con El Pago De $7 Billones Se Libraron De

La Cárcel Los Banqueros Culpables…

De Dejar Sin Casas A 14 Millones de Americanos…

(Muchos Más Que Los “DEFENDIDOS” Ilegales Por La Prensa Socialistas)

¿Cuánto Habrán Ganado Los Banqueros? Cuando

Pueden Pagar 7 Billones y Seguir Trabajando?

 

¿Cuánto Habrán Dado En Contribuciones y Pagos

Por Debajo De La Mesa A Obama y Sus Secuaces

 

Aquí Tienen La Noticia:

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/07/14/citigroup-and-u-s-reach-7-billion-mortgage-settlement/?_php=true&_type=blogs&emc=edit_th_20140715&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=36136352&_r=0

 

Nadie Puede Dudar Que Es Otro Negocito Aprobado Por Obama Con Los Banqueros…

Ahora Solo Falta Uno De Los “GRANDES BANCOS Salvados” Cuando

BUSH y El Congreso De Demócratas y Republicanos… Rompieron

La Leyes Económicas De La Libre Empresa y Acordaron “SALVAR”

De La Quiebra A Los Bancos Culpables De Enriquecerse A Costa De

La Economía Del País y Meter en La Cárcel A Los Culpables…

y Dejaron Sin Sus Casas A Más De 14 Millones De Americanos…

y  Además Le Hicieron Perder El 50% De Los Ahorros A TODOS LOS

CIUDADANOS AMERICANOS…

La Política De Borrón Y Cuenta Nueva…

A Pesar De Las 20,000 Visas Concedidas A

Los Palestinos De Gaza… Por Obama…

(Que Estarán Haciendo Esos Musulmanes En USA Ahora) Mas

Los Millones En Ayuda “HUMANITARIA”

Han Sido Los “Militares Golpistas De Egipto”

Enemigos de Obama… Los Que Consiguieron

Una Tregua Con Los Terroristas De Gaza…

|

BREAKING NEWS ALERT

NYTimes.com

|

Unsubscribe

 BREAKING NEWS

Tuesday, July 15, 2014 2:22 AM EDT

 

Israel’s Security Cabinet Accepts Egyptian Cease-fire Proposal

Israel has accepted Egypt’s proposal for a cessation of hostilities with the Gaza Strip, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office announced on Tuesday morning.

The proposal envisioned a cease-fire beginning at 9 a.m. local timeon Tuesday. It called for border crossings to Gaza to “be opened,” with the movement of people and goods to be “facilitated once the security situation becomes stable on the ground.” Within 48 hours of the initial cease-fire taking hold, talks are to be held in Cairo with the Israelis and the Palestinian militant factions on conditions for a longer-term truce, according to the text of the proposal.

Hamas, which had said it was prepared to fire rockets indefinitely, has appeared to want better terms. Sami Abu Zuhri, a Hamas official in Gaza, wrote on his Facebook page Monday: “The responses of resistance will continue until the demands of our people are achieved. Any unilateral Israeli cessation has no value in the light of the large crimes and the disastrous humanitarian situation.”

One of Hamas’s demands has been the opening of the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt, but the Egyptian Foreign Ministry spokesman said the proposal refers only to crossings “between Israel and Gaza.”

Egypt is widely considered the natural regional mediator in such conflicts. But Egypt’s relations with Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, have turned bitter since the military ouster last year of Egypt’s elected Islamist president, Mohamed Morsi, a leader in the Brotherhood. Under the new president, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, a former general who led the military takeover, Egypt has shut down most of the tunnels beneath its border with Gaza that were both an economic lifeline for the Palestinian coastal enclave as well as a major channel for weapons smuggling.

READ MORE »

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/16/world/middleeast/israels-security-cabinet-accepts-egyptian-cease-fire-proposal.html?emc=edit_na_20140715

 

 This Canadian Leader Just Did What Obama Should Have Done But Didn’t Have The Guts To Do

This is how a real leader acts…

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — 

As Israeli soldiers defend their country from ongoing violence in the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper offered support for the besieged nation. In an effort to combat the continuing attacks from Palestinian enemies, Israel’s army conducted a mission last week consisting of ground troops and air strikes that left at least 160 dead.

“The indiscriminate rocket attacks from Gaza on Israel are terrorist acts for which there is no justification,” he said in a recent statement.

The Canadian Press reports he went on to affirm that Hamas is “deliberately using human shields” as the terror group escalates violence in the region. Harper called on other nations to join him in coming to Israel’s defense.

“Failure by the international community to condemn these reprehensible actions would encourage these terrorists to continue their appalling actions,” he said. “Canada calls on its allies and partners to recognize that these terrorist acts are unacceptable and that solidarity with Israel is the best way of stopping the conflict.”

Harper called on Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to disarm Hamas terrorists in the pursuit of some semblance of peace in the embattled region. Abbas, however, has recently gone to the United Nations to seek protection for his people.

In a recent request to U.N. Secretary General Bank Ki-moon, he complained that the “situation has become unbearable,” citing “hundreds of martyrs and thousands of wounded and huge destruction” in the Gaza Strip.

Ki-moon ultimately urged a ceasefire in the region in light of Palestinian deaths last week. Barack Obama weighed in on the matter as well.

Far from the unabashedly pro-Israel remarks made by his Canadian counterpart, Obama “emphasized the need for all sides to do everything they can to protect the lives of civilians and restore calm,” a White House statement revealed.

In China last week, Secretary of State John Kerry did defend Israel’s right to fight back against Palestinian aggressors.

“No country can accept rocket fire aimed at civilians,” he said; “and we support completely Israel’s right to defend itself against these vicious attacks.”

He went on to conclude that “de-escalation ultimately is in the interest of all parties.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/canadian-leader-just-delivered-pro-israel-message-obama-never-make/#XxjepiHLfqGlq0i5.99

 

Could Obama Be Stabbing America’s Closest Allies In The Back With These Actions?

Our allies are right to be concerned and angry.

L. TODD WOOD — JULY 14, 2014

The list is long and distinguished.  The United Kingdom, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and now Germany have all had the pleasure of being betrayed or disrespected by the Obama administration.  What do these countries have in common?  They are, or were, some of our strongest allies in the world against the enemies of the United States.

In the latest rebuke of Obama’s foreign policy, Germany expelled the CIA station chief in a rare, public display of unhappiness with our Dear Leader and his style of dealing with foreign governments.  It seems in addition to listening to Merkel’s cell phone, several other American spies had been apprehended looking where they shouldn’t have.

There is a real clamor now domestically for Germany to have an even hand when dealing with Russia or the United States. Germany is an economic powerhouse and is being courted heavily by Moscow.  The incompetence of the Obama administration is nothing short of shocking in this case–but sadly, par for the course.

Most people have heard of the animosity displayed by Obama early on in dealings with the United Kingdom.  The most visible evidence of this disrespect was the returning of the bust of Winston Churchill to the U.K.  The bust had sat in the Oval Office as a symbol of the “special relationship” between the two countries and their shared sacrifice in defeating the Nazi juggernaut in World War II.

First the Obama administration tried to lie and say the bust was not returned.  However, it was found that they were speaking of another statue in the White House.  The one that sat in the Oval Office was returned in an extreme act of rudeness by our president.

Our strongest ally in the Middle East and the only real democracy for Arabs or Jews in the region, Israel, can no longer count on the United States to watch its back against the array of Arab nations that are lined up to destroy her.  The Palestinian Authority has aligned with Hamas, a designated terrorist organization; and the Obama administration continues to send billions of our taxpayer dollars to fund the radicals who are launching hundreds of rockets into Israel on a daily basis.  Obama publicly disrespected the Israeli Prime Minister while talking to the French President at a public event.

Iran is being allowed to develop a nuclear weapons capability.  This the same Islamic state that has repeatedly stated a desire to destroy the nation of Israel.  Israel will have no choice but to respond militarily in-kind at some point.  Saudi Arabia refused to fill its seat on the U.N. Security Council in protest against the actions of the Obama administration concerning the Iranian nuclear weapons issue and the refusal of Obama to arm the forces arrayed against Assad in Syria, an Iranian proxy.

Poland was shocked several years ago when the Obama administration cancelled the missile defense system installation on Polish territory that was intended to protect Europe from an Iranian missile launch.  The effort was engineered by the Bush administration and was really disliked by the Kremlin in Moscow.  We all know how the “reset” with Russia has worked out.   The Polish government had spent considerable political capital to get the site approved domestically and felt betrayed by Obama’s action.

One can only wonder if this is an orchestrated effort to loosen ties developed over the decades with friends around the world.  Will America’s allies come to our aid in time of need?  Unfortunately, this is a real question with this administration in power.  Our allies are right to be concerned and angry.

Photo credit: Everett Collection / Shutterstock.com

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-destroying-relationships-closest-allies-purpose/#cx3FiglRPetv0mob.99

 

 

FROM THE DESK OF KARIM RAHEMTULLA

CHIEF RESOURCE ANALYST

 

Dear Wall Street Daily Nation,

For decades now, Big Oil’s most lucrative trading intelligence has been hiding in plain sight.

Although it’s public information, very few everyday investors notice or even understand it.

That’s a real shame… because it’s responsible for minting the fortunes of scores of insiders who know to look for it.

And it’s coveted by every Fortune 500 oil baron who’s ever lived.

At this very moment, such info is directing these players toward a remote swatch of land that’s been confirmed to hold as much as $14-(b)illion worth of oil. And the $3 company that owns every drop of it is reaping the rewards (along with its shareholders).
How do I know? Because I have access to the same research toolthat oil profiteers from around the world have been using to snatch up this “hidden” info and use it to maximize their gains over and over again.

To learn how to use it safely and easily for yourself (as well as the details on this latest $3 target), check out my time-sensitive briefing today.

Ahead of the tape,

Karim Rahemtulla
Chief Resource Analyst, Wall Street Daily

 

 

See Why Michelle Obama’s Program Is Now Attacking Special Education Students

“It’s going to be tough for a lot of us…”

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — 

There has been plenty for school administrators and students to criticize in the recent nutritional mandates promoted by Michelle Obama. From unsatisfying meals to increased costs, districts across the U.S. are trying to escape the strict regulations contained in the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act implemented at the beginning of the month.

At one South Carolina school, however, the restrictions are having a direct impact not only on the morale of students but on the ability of its special needs population to engage in stimulating activities.

According to the Myrtle Beach Sun News, Socastee High School is now forced to forego the sale of Chick-fil-A sandwiches in the school because they contain a few more calories than the new law allows.

“They don’t meet the standards,” Principal Paul Browning said. “We’re struggling with it.”

The chicken sandwiches were obvious draws for students with a desire for something different. More importantly, funds raised from their sale went toward special outings for the school’s special education department.

“It’s going to be tough for a lot of us,” he said. “We will take a hit, but we’ll adjust. It’s going to make us be even more creative.”

Horry County Schools spokesperson Teal Harding noted that the sandwiches are not the only casualty of the first lady’s activism.

“The district is working on information for schools on how to ensure compliance with nutritional regulations for school celebrations, fundraisers and special events,” she explained.

Reports indicate that any food sold between midnight and 30 minutes after school ends on a school day are subject to these mandates.

Chick-fil-A sandwiches contain 440 calories, 90 more than the new regulations allow for entrée items. The sodium content also exceeds the maximum.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/michelle-obama-behind-latest-assault-chick-fil/#VgdLUdfK7uD5iqFt.99

 

NELSON HORTA REPORTA: Llamada telefónica a los contribuyentes busca apoyo para el alcalde Giménez y a una emisión de bonos por $700 millones

• Se le aumentaría $32 dólares por cada $100,000 para pagar por la emisión de bonos

MIAMI 15 DE JULIO DE 2014, nhr.com—Una llamada telefónica que se está haciendo a los residentes del condado Miami Dade busca conocer si los contribuyentes están de acuerdo con con la gestión del alcalde Carlos Giménez, y trata de conocer si los votantes apoyarían una emisión de bonos por $700 millones de dólares para remodelar la corte del condado o sea el edificio conocido popularmente como “Cielito Lindo” en el downtown de Miami.

La llamada comienza por preguntarle a los residentes por las distintas campañas políticas, embaucando al participante con preguntas sobre este u otro candidato para finalmente caer en la cuestión del bono para “salvar a Cielito Lindo”.

El viejo edificio ha sido tema de otros artículos de nelsonhortareporta.com, fue el 29 de enero pasado que alertamos a los residentes de Miami Dade con un articulo titulado, “Corre peligro el edificio de las cortes, “Cielito Lindo” y decíamos:

“Alarmante la situación del viejo edificio de la Corte ubicado en el 73 de la calle Flagler en el down town de la ciudad.

Según las fuentes que contactaron a nelsonhortareporta.com, “pudiera derrumbarse partes del edificio si no se hacen las reparaciones que un estudio recomendó en los últimos días”.

El viejo edificio conocido como “Cielito Lindo” fue construido en el años 1925, el 4 de enero de 1989  se añadió al Registro Nacional de Estados Unidos como uno de los lugares históricos. Cuando fue construido con 360 con 28 pisos era considerado el edificio más alto en Miami y de toda la Florida”.

Después de este artículo, nelsonhortareporta.com usando la ley 119 del registros públicos solicitamos al condado información al respecto y se nos hizo llegar la información sobre las condiciones del edificio y de acuerdo a al estudio, el edificio no ofrece peligro por el momento.

Según el condado el edificio se está renovando como parte de un programa continuo de mejoramiento de estas instalaciones, el proyecto actual de $30 millones de dólares incluye, mejoras del techo, alrededores y la fachada.

A principio del presente año, el condado contrató  a la firma de ingenieros G.M. Selvy y una revisión de las estructuras de apoyo del Palacio de Justicia dice que “ha levantado preocupaciones con respecto a algunas de las columnas de soporte ubicadas en el sótano del edificio”, nos dice la nota que nos envió el condado.

Sin embargo el estudio de ingeniería hecho por G.M. Selvy, también indica que “sobre el actual uso y ocupación del edificio, no se tenía una preocupación inmediata de colapso o fallo basado en las observaciones visuales”, dicen.

Ahora esta llamada le está solicitando a los contribuyentes el apoyo para una emisión de bonos por $700 millones de dólares  en lo que llaman “Bonos de obligación general”, para la reconstrucción de Cielito Lindo y Centros Penitenciarios además de la construcción de 3 nuevos edificios de Tribunales y otras cárceles.

En la misma llamada se le dice al entrevistado que esta emisión de bonos seria pagada con un aumento de un 16% por cada $100 mil dólares en el amillaramiento.

Sin embargo esto tendría que ser llevado a referendo y “estamos seguro que eso no pasara”, nos dijeron anoche dos comisionados de Miami Dade.

Regresando a la remodelación de Cielito Lindo, de acuerdo con los ingenieros de G.M. Selvy, “los edificios de esta edad tienen una inherente redundancia incorporada en su diseño que ayuda enormemente a la estabilidad global de la estructura.  Sin embargo, dada la pérdida estimada de acero en algunas de las áreas de pruebas, algunas fallas localizadas pueden tener lugar en caso de una carga excesiva.  Dicho esto, le recomendamos una evacuación completa del edificio en caso de un huracán de nivel 1.  Nuestra opinión está sujeta a cambio basado en la disponibilidad de información del futuro y los resultados de ensayos destructivos.  Al término de nuestra evaluación, conjuntamente con los resultados de los ensayos destructivos, apuntalamiento temporal se puede recomendar para las columnas que son consideradas inseguro unidad tal vez como reparaciones completa puede ser proporcionado”.

Durante la inspección, los ingenieros señalaron que estaban preocupados, “hemos expresado preocupación con respecto a la condición de la columna por debajo del nivel de la losa, específicamente la condición de la columna de acero, la base de la placa, las conexiones correspondientes y el pie de abajo del hormigón.

Estaremos buscando mas información referente a esta sospechosa llamada y solicitud de otra emisión de bonos “de obligación general” que solo iría a aumentarle  $32 dólares por cada $100 mil dólares del valor de la propiedad a los propietarios de viviendas.

 

After What This School Board Just Said, Every School In America Could Be Trashing Michelle’s Lunch Program

“…Michelle Obama who, last time I checked, has been elected by no one.”

B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE —

Public schools across the nation are reeling from the costly and unappetizing meal choices that have resulted from Michelle Obama’s campaign to fight childhood obesity. Under her direction, the federal government has implemented a number of strict restrictions regarding the nutrition contents of foods served in school cafeterias.

Administrators are increasingly fighting these regulations, with many districts looking to Congress for a way to opt out of the program. For their part, Republicans in the U.S. House have proposed legislation allowing schools that can prove the regulations are cost-prohibitive to bypass the first lady’s pet project.

One school board president in Wisconsin recently weighed in on the restrictions, taking a few jabs at Michelle Obama in the process.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that Muskego-Norway School District Board President Rick Petfalski wants the freedom to decide what is best for local students instead of receiving mandates from D.C.

“We believe that proper food nutrition and meal portion guidelines are best decided at a local level,” he maintained.

He is reportedly willing to forego federal funding for the opportunity to provide meals kids in his district are actually willing to eat. Under the existing guidelines, he noted that the district’s food service program was set to reach a funding shortfall of $54,000 – primarily based on sluggish sales of the unpopular meals.

If his district shuns the federal mandates, however, he said the department could actually reach a surplus of more than $7,000.

“By leaving the program we will not be required to follow these onerous guidelines,” he explained, “pushed by and large by Michelle Obama who, last time I checked, has been elected by no one.”

The Journal Sentinel noted that other area districts are making similar decisions.

Central High School District of Westosha Administrator Scott Pierce said that adherence to the program had his district on track for an $80,000 deficit. He just wants the opportunity to employ a private vendor – which has already been secured – to provide healthy, tasty food for local students.

“We’re not trying to fatten up our kids,” he asserted. “We’re trying to give them food they like.”

Waterford Graded School District Superintendent Christopher Joch reported that the mandates led to significant waste, adding that parents in his district were outspoken critics of the program.

“The food ended up in the garbage instead of the kids’ mouths,” he recalled.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/school-board-leader-goes-tremendous-rant-michelles-nutrition-mandates/#bktTw35UfwCS6Dfj.99

“EMO” It look that michelle plan is shitt…LRGM

 

Olga Grinan: ACTA PARA LA REFORMA DEL CONGRESO DEL ANO 2012

Y NO PASO PORQUE FUE RECHAZADA POR LOS DEMOCRATAS

1- NO HABRA PENSION POR HABER SIDO MIEMBRO DEL CONGRESO
2- EL/LA CONGRESISTA RECIBIRA SALARIO MIENTRAS ESTE EN LA OFICINA Y NO RECIBIRA PAGO CUANDO ESTE AFUERA.
3- TODOS LOS MIEMBROS DEL CONGRESO (PASADOS, PRESENTES Y FUTUROS) PARTICIPARAN DEL SEGURO SOCIAL
4- TODOS LOS FONDOS DE RETIRO DEL CONGRESO PASARAN INMEDIATAMENTE A LOS FONDOS DEL SEGURO SOCIAL Y EL CONGRESO PARTICIPARA IGUAL QUE EL PUEBLO AMERICANO. NO PUEDEN SER USADOS CON OTRO PROPOSITO.
5- EL CONGRESO PUEDE ADQUIRIR SU PLAN DE RETIRO IGUAL QUE CUALQUIER OTRO CIUDADANO AMERICANO
6- EL CONGRESO NO PODRA VOTAR YA MAS PARA AUMENTARSE A SI MISMO EL SUELDO. Y EL AUMENTO SERA IGUAL A UN 3%
7- EL CONGRESO PERDERA SU SISTEMA DE SEGURO DE SALUD ACTUAL Y PARTICIPARA DEL MISMO SISTEMA DE SEGURO DE SALUD QUE EL PUEBLO AMERICANO.
8- EL CONGRESO ESTARA SUJETO A LAS MISMAS LEYES QUE ELLOS IMPONEN AL PUEBLO AMERICANO.
9- TODOS LOS CONTRATOS QUE SE HAYAN HECHO CON LOS/LAS CONGRESISTAS EN EL PASADO Y EN EL PRESENTE QUEDAN SIN EFECTO A PARTIR DE 12/1/12. EL PUEBLO NO HIZO ESTOS CONTRATOS CON LOS CONGRESISTAS

 

“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño

 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

No 702 “EN MI OPINIóN” Julio 2, 2014

July 2, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor.
La Traición y los cómplices…
A nadie aquí le ha llamado la atención de que miles de niños han entrado de pronto por la frontera de Mejico con USA. Caballeros déjense de comer enjundia de gallina. Esto es una invasión, si una invasión de niños para hacerle las cosas más difíciles a los agentes guarda frontera que realmente no se ocupan demasiado de guardar las fronteras y que además “En m opinión” no reciben las ordenes enérgicas que debían recibir de su presidente. Esto no es más que un capítulo más de esta opereta en la que casi todo el mundo es espectador. Es como si a nadie le importara. Y así perderemos el mejor país del mundo por los enemigos que entran por la frontera pero principalmente por los ENEMIGOS INTERNOS que hasta sentados en el congreso y la silla presidencial y los americanos están chupándose el dedo gordo y no hacen absolutamente nada por parar este relajo y falta de respeto. Así vamos a celebrar el 4 de Julio. Los que Firmaron ese documento el cuatro de julio se deben estar estremeciendo en sus tumbas por ver la traición de los mismos americanos. ¿También eres tú un cómplice, que no vas a hacer nada? Lázaro R González Miño

Remember How Seal Team 6 Was Shot Down? Now We Could Finally Know Why Obama Is Covering It Up
In this video, we reveal this and much more…
KRIS ZANE — JULY 1, 2014
On August 6, 2011, in Wardak Province, Afghanistan, jihadists perched on top of a building shot down a decrepit CH-47 helicopter, Extortion 17, packed with 30 Special Ops forces–most of them part of the elite SEAL Team 6. Almost immediately, facts about the attack were hushed up that included skirting away the black box. Furthermore, within hours, everyone on board was cremated, supposedly because they were burned beyond recognition. Family members of the victims have learned that virtually everything the Obama administration has revealed about the attack is a lie.
The likely reason for the coverup? The high-tech weapon used to shoot down Extortion 17, a heat-seeking missile, more than likely was supplied by none other than Barack Hussein Obama.
In this video, we reveal this and much more…
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/revealed-seal-team-6-murder-weapon-supplied-obama/#IhtAqQPfZUiDBJC8.99

Amenper: Memo to Anti-Coal Warriors

Usually, I don’t speak much about nuclear power.
Because of the fact that I have a son in the nuclear industry, some may consider my opinion to be influenced by personal interests.
But let me pass you this article of William Tucker about Nuclear energy in today’s Journal.
Now that the liberal press is up in arms against coal, they should remember that because of Jimmy Carter law against nuclear plants, coal still exists as an important energy source. Otherwise it would be almost extinct.
We have the energy resources we need and enough to export.
We have oil, but we don’t drill, we have gas but regulations make it difficult to use it, we have the best nuclear technology in the world, but we had to give it to other countries, because our president imposed a ban in nuclear plants for 35 years.
Jimmy Carter is in a close race with Obama for the dubious honor of being the worst president in the history of the United States.
Sometimes I ask myself, is this ignorance?, or is it an intelligent plan designed to destroy the country?

Memo to Anti-Coal Warriors: Make Nuclear Peace
It’s not too late to fix Jimmy Carter’s energy blunder of the 1970s.
WILLIAM TUCKER
The Environmental Protection Agency has issued a 645-page ruling whose basic aim is to cut coal plants out of the mix in producing the nation’s electricity. States will supposedly be given a choice, but the only real way to meet the agency’s demands for carbon-dioxide reductions will be to cut back on coal. All this will be a devastating blow to the Midwestern economy, driving up energy prices for everyone, while having only the slightest impact on global warming.
There is a great irony to this. In the early 1970s, coal was being phased out as the nation’s principal source of electricity. The initial concerns about air pollution had focused on coal, and environmental groups such as the Sierra Club were campaigning to lift the 20-year-old ban on imported oil so we could replace coal with low-sulfur oil from Libya and Indonesia.
All this came to a halt with the Arab oil embargo of 1973-74. It became clear that burning oil for electricity in the U.S. was a luxury we could no longer afford. But there was a salvation on the horizon. The nation was just embarking on a monumental effort to implement nuclear power, with almost 200 reactors on the drawing boards or in the pipeline. This would supplant both coal and oil and solve the problem of air pollution once and for all. (Concerns about carbon emissions had not yet arisen.)
Work on more than 50 reactors had already begun when the effort hit a snag. With the new administration of President Jimmy Carter, environmentalists gained a foothold in the government for the first time. They were opposed to air pollution but they were more opposed to nuclear power. At the same time, Mr. Carter was under tremendous pressure to find a replacement for foreign oil, so environmentalists came up with a solution. Theorists such as soft-energy guru Amory Lovins argued that coal could be cleaned up through new technologies—the fluidized bed, for instance, which pulverizes coal for nearly complete combustion. This would allow coal to serve as a bridge to the coming legions of wind, solar and other renewable energies that would be ready to take over completely somewhere around 2025.
Given the choice between coals and nuclear, Mr. Carter chose coal. He canceled experimental reactors, shut down research, ended the reprocessing of spent fuel (a decision that created the unnecessary problem of nuclear waste), and effectively brought the technology to a halt. At the time, the nation was burning half-a-billion tons of coal a year. Mr. Carter vowed we would reach one billion tons by 2000 and that promise was fulfilled. Even as coal use declines today, we still consume just under one billion tons a year.
As a result, America has lost its lead in nuclear technology. There are now 60 reactors under construction around the world—including 26 in China—but only four new ones being built in the U.S. Russia, France and South Korea are even further ahead in the technology, selling their reactors all over the world. India and Argentina each just brought a new reactor on line in May.
On Friday, Russia fired up a fast breeder reactor, the holy grail that consumes all forms of nuclear waste. We abandoned the technology in the 1990s.
To illustrate further how far things have declined in this country: Fourteen years ago Bill Gates assigned Microsoft’s MSFT -1.30% technology genius Nathan Myhrvold to explore the frontiers for advanced energy. Mr. Myhrvold settled on a design using the traveling wave, a reactor that burns for 50 years without refueling and consumes its own waste. After waiting a year at the gates of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Rockville, Md., Messrs. Gates and Myhrvold realized there was no hope of experimenting in the U.S. So they took their reactor design to China. In 2011 Mr. Gates signed an agreement with the Chinese National Nuclear Corporation to develop the traveling wave.
The same thing is happening with thorium, which produces no plutonium and is therefore proliferation-proof. Most nuclear engineers believe thorium to be a far superior fuel to uranium. China and India are developing thorium technology, but not the U.S.
It is ridiculous to think we can go into the Industrial Belt of the Midwest and tell people they must close down coal plants without anything to replace them. Natural gas is offered as an alternative, but with gas leading a manufacturing revival, pressure building to export it, and attempts under way to substitute gas for gasoline in our cars, who knows how long the price will remain low?
We should be building nuclear reactors right beside every old coal plant. Had we pursued this path 40 years ago, we would not only have lowered U.S. carbon emissions, as have France and Sweden, but we could be helping other countries reduce theirs as well. We can still, if we go back to that road not taken and revive nuclear energy.
Mr. Tucker is the author of “Terrestrial Energy: How Nuclear Power Will Lead the Green Revolution and End America’s Energy Odyssey” (Bartleby Press, 2010).

WATCH: Impeachment Is Nothing Compared To What Ted Cruz Wants To Do To Eric Holder
“If this was a Republican administration…”
JUSTIN KOSKI — JULY 1, 2014
Texas Senator Ted Cruz sounds off on Attorney General Eric Holder for his appointing of of a major democratic donor, Barbara Bosserman, to investigate the IRS scandal. Cruz then called for Holder’s impeachment if he refused to appoint an independent prosecutor.
Cruz cited the decisions of the Attorneys General under Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton to appoint independent prosecutors when they both were accused of abusing their power.
“If this were a Republican administration, every media outlet would have banner headlines every single day.”
“If the allegation is of abusive government power at the IRS, to target citizens for their political beliefs, then you cannot entrust the investigation to a partisan whose political interest is protecting the party in power,” said Cruz.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/ted-cruz-goes-holder-wont-appoint-special-prosecutor-impeached/#Krki8BMHszK3RtOI.99

Israel Finds Missing Teens Dead, Considers Strikes Against Hamas
Should they strike?
F. PETER BROWN —

The recent discovery of the bodies of three missing teens in Israel has triggered outrage against Hamas, the Palestinian terrorist group. Hamas is believed to be responsible by Israeli authorities for kidnapping and then murdering the teens.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanhayu expressed anger against Hamas for the slayings:
They were kidnapped and murdered in cold blood by beasts.
He added:
Hamas is responsible and Hamas will pay.
Netanyahu also expressed deep remorse for the three murdered Israeli students:
On behalf of the people of Israel, I wish to tell their dear families … our hearts are bleeding, the entire nation is weeping with you.
The Israeli ambulance was stoned by Palestinian Arabs after it picked up the corpses of the three teens.
Now Netanyahu’s security cabinet has convened after nightfall to discuss the situation. They are weighing the options of going after Hamas, the group believed to be responsible by Israel.
A retired colonel, Shaul Shay, said:
If the goal is to create large-scale damage to the infrastructure in Gaza, it can be done from the air.
He also said:
But if the goal is to change the strategic environment, you need boots on the ground.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/israel-finds-missing-teens-dead-considers-strikes-against-hamas/#SWY8q8wjYTBXlg6m.99

OBAMA’S ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION INVITATION. By: John Hayward
You can tell the tidal wave of illegal aliens, many of them unaccompanied minors, surging across the southern border is causing a bit of political discomfort for President Obama, because he briefly felt obliged to pretend he’s not happy about it. ”Briefly” means last Friday, when the President gave us the hilarious vaudeville pantomime act of asking the people of Central America to stop throwing their kids across the hemisphere. From a Washington Times report:
President Obama made a personal plea Friday for the families of Central America not to send their children to America, trying to stanch the crisis of illegal immigrant youths flooding across the border.
“Our message is absolutely don’t send your children unaccompanied on trains or through a bunch of smugglers,” Mr. Obama said on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”
He made the plea in response to a bipartisan group of senators who Thursday demanded that he “personally make clear” that minors jumping the border won’t get special treatment.
The president, who continues to struggle with how to deal with the thousands of unaccompanied alien children flooding across the southern border, stressed that the journey to America isn’t safe for children traveling alone and that the U.S. will send them home after they arrive.
“Our message is absolutely don’t send your children unaccompanied on trains or through a bunch of smugglers,” he said. “That is our direct message to the families of Central America: Do not send your children to the borders. If they do make it, they’ll get sent back. More importantly, they might not make it.”
“They’ll get sent back?” How stupid does this man think we are? Tell you what, Mr. President: how about you personally travel aboard the first mass repatriation flight to Honduras, and give your “they’ll be sent back” warning in a speech from there, surrounded by the thousand minors you just hauled back from the refugee camps you want American taxpayers to spend $2 billion on. Then people might start paying attention to your rhetorical “messages.”
In truth, false messages are being sent to American voters, while the incoming wave of refugees are getting the real message loud and clear. The same Washington Times article includes a quote from an unnamed Administration official who admitted “more than 50 percent of children who illegally cross the border alone will be allowed to remain in the United States.” A 50-50 shot at getting your kid residency plus benefits in the United States looks pretty good to people trapped in the violent squalor of Central America, stuck between corrupt governments and trigger-happy drug gangs. And really, that’s a ridiculous under-estimation of the odds of success. The real “repatriation” rate for families traveling with children won’t crack 10 percent, and it’ll be even less for unaccompanied minors.
Obama was back to his Cloward-Piven strategy of deliberately overloading the U.S. immigration system on Monday, promising to use more executive orders like the one that launched this invasion, his Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, because Congress won’t give him what he wants. The Democrats’ enthusiasm for “enlightened” despotism, and their hunger to keep that flood of illegals coming in, reached insulting lows when Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) said that if House Speaker John Boehner doesn’t get a “comprehensive immigration reform bill” cooking soon, “the president will ‘borrow’ the power that is needed to solve the problems of immigration.”
That’s the new euphemism for dictatorship: “borrowing” powers forbidden by the Constitution, because Congress won’t do what the dictator wants. Perhaps smarting from the long string of Supreme Court decisions that have made a mockery of his claims to be an expert in constitutional law, the President didn’t endorse this novel theory of power-borrowing in so many words on Monday, instead opting to pretend that he’s deeply sorrowful that he must trample on the separation of powers to get what he wants, because the American system refuses to obey him. From a Fox News report:
President Obama vowed Monday to bypass Congress and pursue unilateral changes to the country’s immigration system, defying House Republicans who say his executive actions are part of the problem.
The president, speaking in the Rose Garden, said he is forced to go it alone because the House has failed to act on a comprehensive overhaul. He said Speaker John Boehner informed him last week the House will not vote on an immigration bill this year.
“America cannot wait forever for them to act,” Obama said. He said he’s launching a new effort to “fix as much of our immigration system as I can, on my own, without Congress.”
I expect thunderous applause from every Democrat in the land when the next Republican president invokes precisely the same reasoning to bypass Congress and fix our tax system, which is far more broken and confusing than our immigration laws.
The president’s announcement is sure to infuriate congressional Republicans. Obama is pushing for new executive actions in defiance of Boehner’s vow last week to pursue a lawsuit against the president over alleged executive overreach. Even before Monday’s announcement, Boehner and his colleagues alleged that the president has gone too far in making changes without Congress to immigration policy, the Affordable Care Act, environmental regulations and other issues.
This new push would go further still.
In a written statement, Boehner called Obama’s announcement “sad and disappointing,” and said executive orders “can’t and won’t fix these problems.”
“Sad” and “disappointing” are not the correct words for this, Speaker Boehner. What Obama is doing with this illegal-alien tsunami, and his talk of shredding the Constitution to get what he wants, is outrageous. And it’s not “sad” in the sense that we should feel a swell of pity for the President – he’s aggressively abusing his power, and bringing in foreign power, to rewrite the American system in a way voters did not endorse, and very few support. This might be thought of as “sad” if it wasn’t working. But it is.
Which brings us to the classic Cloward-Piven part of President Obama’s remarks – as pure a distillation of their manufactured-crisis theory as you’ll ever hear:
During his remarks in the Rose Garden, Obama cited the current surge of illegal immigrant children crossing the southern border and said the “crisis” should underscore the need to pass a comprehensive bill. But Boehner claimed that it was Obama’s past executive orders — those easing deportations for some illegal immigrants — that “have led directly to the humanitarian crisis along the southern border.”
Boehner said “additional executive action from this president isn’t going to stem the tide of illegal crossings, it’s only going to make them worse.” He also referred to last week’s Supreme Court ruling that Obama overstepped in making recess appointments, saying the court “reminded us” that there are “sharp limits” to presidential power.
As for his conversation last week with the president, Boehner said he only told Obama what he’s been saying for months: that until the public and elected officials trust him to enforce the law, “it is going to be difficult to make progress on this issue.”
Yes, he just “cited” the crisis he deliberately created as a justification for getting even more of what he wants. Cloward-Piven all the way down, baby! And while Speaker Boehner is correct to point out that more executive orders to weaken our immigration system will only make the crisis worse, it’s a bit silly to pretend that Obama himself doesn’t know that.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi – reliably dense enough to forget that the victims aren’t supposed to know they’re being mauled by a Cloward-Piven attack – chipped in by looking at the thousands of alien kids tucked into makeshift refugee shelters, beaming warmly at the humanitarian nightmare her Party has created, and pronouncing it a wonderful “opportunity.”
“This crisis that some call a crisis, we have to view as an opportunity,” Pelosi squealed in delight. ”If you believe as we do that every child, every person has a spark of divinity in them, and is therefore worthy of respect – what we saw in those rooms was a dazzling, sparkling array of God’s children, worthy of respect.”
That’s grimly amusing coming from an abortion extremist who is all about snuffing out “divine sparks of life” in some children. How about all the children who are dying on their thousand-mile trek to accept your amnesty offer, Mrs. Pelosi? Texas police say they come across such bodies “quite often.” The most recent gruesome discovery was an 11-year-old Guatemalan boy who got lost on his way to Nancy Pelosi’s opportunity drive, and died a mile from the Texas border with a rosary around his neck…. and the phone number of his brother in Chicago written on the inside of his belt buckle.
As for the Supreme Court smackdowns, it’s debatable just how “sharp” those limits on executive power are, especially since Obama and the Democrats show absolutely no sign of being chastened by their defeats, nor is their friendly media interested in shaming them. Attacks on the American constitutional order that get partially repelled years later by Supreme Court decisions cannot be judged entirely ineffective. In this case, if Obama scribbles some more amnesty orders and the 150,000 unaccompanied alien minors anticipated this year turns into 200,000 or 250,000, does anyone really think a 2016 thrashing at the Supreme Court would result in all those kids getting sent home? What Obama is doing on the border cannot be reversed by any court, and if they step in to slow him down in a couple of years, it will already be too late to make a difference.
Obama’s “plea” to the governments and people of Central America on Friday was really just a bit of theater to reinforce the Administration’s favorite new talking point, which is that the new wave of illegal aliens are wrong or foolish to come here – they were supposedly deluded by “misinformation” from smugglers, local media, and government officials. That’s supposed to get Obama off the hook for provoking the crisis. It’s not his fault that hundreds of thousands of people failed to read the fine print in his executive orders!
But it bears repeating that the truth is painfully obvious, and entirely contrary to this silly talking point. The message being sent to illegals did not come from Obama looking into a camera, holding up a map of the Rio Grande, and inviting them all to visit Texas. The message is sent by what our political class says about illegal immigration, and the reality of what happens to those who make it across the border. Interviews with the new arrivals underline that many of them have friends of relatives already living in the United States, who are giving them not “misinformation,” but a quite accurate picture of where the immigration reform debate has been heading.
Those contemplating a run for the border can hear Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) sayingthat while Republicans decide whether or not to provide the alien-friendly immigration “reforms” he wants, “I believe the President of the United States has already in statute, in the law, the ability to heal and put in a safe harbor millions of undocumented immigrants while the Congress of the United States finally decides it’s going to take action.” He added that he expects Republicans to keep saying “no, no, no” on an immigration deal… but he also expects Obama to be “broad, expansive, and generous in the use of his prosecutorial discretion.” Message to aliens: no deportations.
The only hitch in this strategy thus far has been the unanticipated volume of the new arrivals. They weren’t supposed to come quite this rapidly; it spooked the American electorate, especially once photos of the grim reality in Nancy Pelosi’s Hubs of Opportunity started leaking out. President Obama felt obliged to announce on Friday that he’s moving additional resources to the border – something that he would have done a long time ago, if he was sincerely concerned about the crisis itself, rather than its political fallout. This story has been percolating through conservative media for months, and the mainstream press picked it up weeks ago. The President would have known about the gathering crisis before those refugee camps started filling up – we have intelligence services that would detect massive migrant waves moving across the hemisphere. But only now does Obama decide to beef up the Border Patrol?
Polls show Americans not only responding negatively to the humanitarian crisis on the border, but also a growing desire to restrict legal immigration further, although they still seem supportive of visa programs for skilled workers. Some of the reluctance for high levels of legal immigration is probably a response to the endless economic doldrums of the Obama years, the sense that the American economy isn’t creating enough jobs to sustain the people who are already here. In fact, a remarkable report from the Center for Immigration Studies, released last week, found that virtually all net jobs created from 2000 to 2014 went to immigrants – in other words, job creation is barely keeping pace with immigration, while the native-born workforce shrinks.
Hitting the brakes on immigration in the face of such concerns is a reasonable response, not xenophobia. But of course, it will be denounced as xenophobia by the dominant political and media culture of the United States… and that message will be heard beyond our borders far more clearly than a presidential press conference or two. The message that what the American people want from immigration reform matters very little to the Ruling Class has been sent loud and clear, too.

AMENPER: CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS
No. 13-354. Sostuvo 25 de marzo 2014-Decidió 30 de junio 2014 *
La Ley de Restauración de Libertad Religiosa de 1993 (RFRA) prohíbe “el Gobierno [de] sustancialmente imponer un cargo por el derecho [ing] del ejercicio de la religión de una persona, incluso si el cargo resulta de regla de aplicabilidad general, ¬” a menos que el Gobierno “demuestra que la aplicación de laa obligación a la persona-(1) es para promover un convincente ¬ interés mental; y (2) es el medio menos restrictivo de interés público imperativo más allá de 2 USC § § 2000bb-1 (a), (b).
En su versión modificada por la Ley de Uso del derecho Religioso y ´personas institucionalizadas de 2000 (RLUIPA), RFRA cubre “cualquier ejercicio de la religión, sea o no obligado por, o central, un sistema de creencia religiosa sea ¬.” § 2000cc-5 (7) (A).

Esta acertada decisión de la corte suprema si la sacamos de la verborrea legal, se trata simplemente de la aplicación de la libertad de culto que implementaron los fundadores de la nación. Una nación creada en sus principios por perseguidos religiosos.
No se trata realmente de lo que oímos, no se trata de nada que tenga que ver con la salud ni el derecho de la mujer. Cualquier mujer puede comprar un anticonceptivo a un precio barato o lo puede obtener sin costo en las clínicas de “planificación familiar”- O sea que las reclamaciones de “guerra contra las mujeres” y las reclamaciones de ataques a la salud de la población es pura política liberal.
Por la otra parte, no es cierta religión lo que se está defendiendo, la mayoría de los católicos han usado anticonceptivos. Es simplemente el derecho de una persona de negarse a que le impongan una carga que va contra el ejercicio de las doctrinas de institución religiosa a que pertenecen. Esto es lo que aclara la decisión. Las dos partes están presentando hechos que no son muy exactos, pero lo que sí es exacto es que la libertad de culto, o sea la libertad de pensar y practicar una religión al no ser que sea contra el interés público. O sea que si no afecta el derecho de otros, el derecho personal de practicar una religión está protegido por la constitución.
Si esta administración por intereses políticos, trata la constitución como papel higiénico, la Corte Suprema solamente le está recordando que aunque bajo ataque, todavía en este país la separación de poderes está vigente y que es el derecho de la corte interpretarla y asegurar que se cumpla.

Georgia ‘Guns Everywhere’ Law In Effect Today
Due to a new measure effective today, Georgia residents may take guns into some bars, nightclubs and schools as long as they have a license to carry.
The law allows religious leaders to “opt in” to permit guns on their worship premises and also makes it legal for permit-holders to take firearms near Transportation Security Administration (TSA) checkpoints.
Critics call the measure the “guns everywhere” bill. They believe it disturbs places of worship, bars and schools, though Georgians may not bring their firearm into a bar or church if the property owner bans them. GeorgiaCarry lobbied for the bill, calling it “meaningful pro-gun legislation.”
Georgia Governor Nathan Deal signed the bill into law in April. The measure was approved by the Republican-controlled Georgia General Assembly.

Samitier: Dime Con Quien Andas Y Te Diré Quién Eres… Resuelto! Los Homosexuales Declaran A El Papa Bergolio oficialmente “COOL”…
El notorio homosexual Elton John,
declara que el Papa Francisco,
es “maravilloso”.

Dijo: “Nosotros, Los Hateros Sexuales, Somos Todos
Homofóbicos, Retrógrados, Intolerantes, Etc.
Porque Queremos Un Mundo Sano!
Ahora Los ENFERMOS Somos Los NORMALES… Qué No DAMOS LAS NALGAS…
Pop icon Elton John calls Pope Francis “wonderful”
http://news.yahoo.com/pop-icon-elton-john-calls-pope-francis-wonderful-173457364.html
El Gobierno, Repleto De Homosexuales Y Comunistas Infiltrados,
Como Maestros y Técnicos En Toda Clase De Actividades…
Usa Un Muñequito Lésbico Para Adoctrinar A Los Menores Usando
El Dinero Del Pueblo.

Justice Dept Uses Lesbian Cartoon Characters

To Teach Kids About Cell Phone Safety

The Department of Justice has spent $1.2 million on a website which depicts cartoon cellphones
engaging in real-life dating scenarios, in an effort to help teens define their “digital line” as it pertains to relationship abuse.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/26/justice-dept-uses-lesbian-cartoon-characters-to-teach-kids-about-cell-phone-safety/#ixzz36Htoac9D
¿Qué Es “Abuso De Un Menor” ??? Usted decide…
Los Médicos Dictaminaron Que Nacer En La Casa Es Un Crimen…
Toda Mis Padres y Hermanos Nacieron En La Casa…
Cualquiera que se enfrenta al sistema medico oficial, es una amenaza a la sociedad.
El Gobierno decide lo que es bueno para el Pueblo!
Cuando los homosexuales sidosos iban por las discotecas infectando a otros,
eso era su derecho. Pero cuando una madre desea dar a luz en su casa,
eso es abuso infantil, de acuerdo al mismo gobierno.
También UNA NALGADA… Es ABUSO Infantil…
Pero Una ENTRADA DE PALOS POR LA POLICIA
ES UNA NECESIDAD SOCIAL…
Algo no cuadra???
See more at: http://healthydebates.com/police-confiscate-healthy-baby-born-home/#sthash.3nH0wlC5.dpuf

Watch: What Sheriff Joe Just Suggested To Do To Secure The Border Will Make Liberals Go Crazy
“I would go back to what I did in Mexico…”
B. CHRISTOPHER AGEE — JUNE 30, 2014
In a recent radio interview, the Arizona lawman often described as ‘America’s toughest sheriff’ weighed in once again on the immigration crisis that has disproportionately affected his state and others that share a border with Mexico.
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio concluded that he has “a lot of authority as sheriff,” though he has a few ideas about how to secure the border and stem the flow of illegal immigrants that could only be implemented by the federal authorities.
“I would go back to what I did in Mexico,” he said, recalling his years as a special agent with the Drug Enforcement Agency.
He explained that U.S. agents “worked right along with Mexico authorities locking up dope peddlers,” noting the same approach could be used to fight illegal immigration.
“I’d send my Border Patrol across the border,” he said, and encourage them to “work with the Federales and the military.”
While Arpaio conceded that such an approach is unlikely from this or any modern administration, he concluded “that’s what we used to do and we really dried up the drug traffic.”
He noted that the U.S. military could be involved in the interest of safety, noting that the only roadblock would be convincing the Mexican president that such a bilateral approach would be beneficial to all involved.
Arpaio asserted that he would simply “go in there, have a few drinks with him, and get the job done.”
Instead, the sheriff lamented that the federal government is spending its time accusing him and his department of racial discrimination based on the effort to uphold federal law.
“I had 160 of my people trained for six weeks and given the authority to enforce federal illegal immigration laws,” he said. “They took that away from me. I guess we’re doing too good a job.”
He concluded that the border will continue to pose problems as long as those in power refuse to act. The recidivism rate among illegals, he noted, is extraordinarily high, leading him to believe that criminals are being “dumped on the streets of Arizona” upon their release instead of being deported to their home country.
The current influx of illegals, he suggested, was likely “a ploy to generate controversy” in the hopes that “Congress would finally look at the situation or the president would start issuing executive orders.”
Public backlash against the steady stream of border-crossers, however, has caused that plan to backfire, he said.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/sheriff-joe-thinks-novel-approach-border-security-work/#iHgigGFje5w0ZEKv.99

AMENPER: A comer yerba
Cuando los ambientalistas preocupados por el “cambio climático” se convierten en comisarios de la policía federal de nutrición, es una receta para el desastre.
Leyendo de la actualización para el 2015 de las Guías Alimentarias para los estadounidenses, que se revisan cada cinco años. Los departamentos federales de Agricultura y Salud y Servicios Humanos se basan en las recomendaciones del Comité Asesor de las Guías Dietéticas ambientalista para modificar las normas de nutrición de la nación.
Y ahí es donde las ruedas se le caen al carretón.
El comité incluye a nutricionistas “radicales” que quieren salvar el planeta para los estadounidenses cambiando a una “dieta basada en plantas”—-, oyeron, no más lechón asado al pincho este cuatro de Julio, no más arroz con frijoles negros. Nos dicen. “En general, queremos estar seguros de hacer recomendaciones para una dieta saludable, ecológicamente responsable”, dice la presidenta del comité Bárbara Millen.
Así que es lo que nos están diciendo, ¿Que los, consejos de nutrición no se basan consideraciones dietéticas, sino en lo que se considera ser “ecológicamente” saludable para el planeta?
Incluso si la mayoría de los estadounidenses ignoramos estas tonterías, las directrices afectan en última instancia, los programas federales de nutrición, como las comidas escolares.
Nuestros hijos y nietos considerarán que somos salvajes comiendo y nos pedirán yerba verde en nochebuena.
El Congreso no debe permitir que los extremistas cometan atropellos contra lo que los estadounidenses consumen.
Si una cruzada ambiental se apodera de lo que se supone que son las pautas de nutrición, a continuación, los legisladores deben retener los fondos para las directrices.
No debemos permitir que con el dinero de nosotros los contribuyentes nuestros hijos tengan una dieta obligatoria determinada no por dietistas pero por burócratas de la religión ambientalista.
Y que los déspotas dietéticos mastiquen eso y se traguen sus yerbas y nos dejen con las comidas que nos ha permitido vivir por todos estos años.
Claro que como van las cosas ¿Qué importa el congreso? Tenemos al presidente con su pluma alegre firmando decisiones ejecutivas. Aunque nosotros los cubanos quizás podamos convencer al presidente que los frijoles como son negros, es mejor que la yerba verde.

MIRIAM DOPICO: WANT TO STOP RACISM IN AMERICA? THIS VIDEO IS ONLY 2 MINUTES LONG…PLEASE WATCH IT AND THEN FORWARD FAR & WIDE.

Want To Stop Racism In America ? – Arrest Barack Obama

WND MEDIA
NEWSPAPER VERY SORRY FOR ENDORSING OBAMA
Prez ‘has earned every bit of an abysmal approval rating’
The Billings, Montana, Gazette, the biggest newspaper in the state, and, in fact, the biggest in a region that includes portions of neighbors North Dakota, Wyoming and Idaho, is admitting, slightly after the fact, that it was wrong to endorse Barack Obama for president in 2008.
“Sometimes, you have to admit you’re wrong,” the newspaper said in an unbylined editorial on June 27. “And, we were wrong.”
It listed a series of scandals and controversies generated by the Obama administration, and the lack of progress on real issues.
“These are all signs – none of them definitive on their own, necessarily. However, when taken in completely, these demonstrate a disturbing trend of incompetence and failure. It’s not just that Americans are in a sour mood about national politics. That’s probably part of it. Instead, Obama has become another in a line of presidents long on rhetoric and hopelessly short on action,” the paper said.
“Obama’s hope and change have left liberals and conservatives alike hoping for real change, not just more lofty rhetoric.”
The Washington Examiner noted the change of heart with a headline, “That bad, huh? Newspaper so disappointed in Obama it apologizes for 2008 endorsement.”
The Examiner continued, “Better late than never.”
The Gazette explained that for the 2008 election, it believed that “things couldn’t get much worse after the sub par presidency of George W. Bush.”
“But,” the paper wrote, “President Barack Obama’s administration has us yearning for the good ol’ days when we were at least winning battles in Iraq.”
It listed the number of “bungled or blown policies” by Obama, “which lead us to believe Obama has earned every bit of an abysmal approval rating.”
Those issues, all of which have been covered extensively on the pages of WND over the last six years, include the National Security Agency program to spy on Americas, the crackdown by Obama on coal-fired power plants, Iraq, the Bowe Bergdahl exchange in which Obama released five known and feared terrorist leaders, the Veterans Administration scandal, stem cell technology, Obama’s crackdown on journalists and, “finally, Obamacare has become synonymous with boondoggle.”
The criticisms were pointed on these issues.
“”The administration as done nearly nothing to safeguard civil liberties or put in safeguards to protect our constitutionally guaranteed freedoms,” the paper wrote about the NSA spying scandal.
On Bergdahl, the paper said, “What should have been an easy public relations victory for bringing a lost soldier home turned into a public relations nightmare, and continued to erode public confidence, leading some to wonder if Obama’s team can’t even get something as important as bringing home a captive soldier correct, what can it be successful at?”
The VA debacle “was another black eye for the administration which appeared to look incompetent when it comes to taking care of wounded, or in-need veterans.”
On Obamacare, it said, “One thing is certain: The public presentation and roll-out of the program was so riddled with technical glitches and problems, it greatly undermined the public’s confidence in the system.”
The Western Journalism Center pointed out that the newspaper did not endorse Obama again in 2012, after calling for his election in 2008.
At that time, the paper said, “At this extremely challenging time, America needs a uniter, not a divider. In this economic turmoil, America needs a thoughtful, cool-headed optimist who envisions a bright future for all citizens. … Our great nation needs a new leader who can inspire confidence at home and aboard. Obama is that leader.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/newspaper-apologizes-for-endorsing-obama-in-08/#PhjhMWe4Su5vqjBe.99

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/newspaper-apologizes-for-endorsing-obama-in-08/#PhjhMWe4Su5vqjBe.99

Send Congress the pink slip
Shock campaign that fired up 2010 revolution is back.

WASHINGTON – What happens when more than 9 million messages warning Congress to shape up or ship out?
The only time it ever happened was 2009. That’s when WND launched the “Send Congress a Pink Slip” campaign resulting in an avalanche of imminent firing notices that were carefully and successfully delivered to every member of Congress over a period of several months.
The warnings were delivered on pink paper – depleting all supplies of pink paper in North America. Piled on top of one another, they would tower above the tallest building in the Capitol, the Washington Monument – eventually even the tallest building in the world. Some members extolled the campaign against overspending and irresponsible behavior, while others whispered and murmured about it behind closed doors.
Ultimately the pink slip campaign presaged the tea party movement and one of the biggest voter revolts in American history in 2010.
And that’s why WND is bringing it back – updated, rejuvenated and refined – in 2014.
Here’s the message to every single member of the House and Senate you can send by participating in the campaign before November:

THIS IS YOUR FINAL NOTICE!
It’s time to do the job you were elected to do:
• Hold the president accountable for repeated violations of the Constitution.
• Punish all those culpable for using the IRS to target citizens based on their political beliefs and activities.
• Break up the Veterans Administration cartel and get medical care to our vets now.
• Demand Barack Obama enforce immigration laws now or else.

If you fail to live up to these urgent demands, your REAL PINK SLIP WILL BE ISSUED ON ELECTION DAY.

Signed,

Your employer,

Each pink slip bears your actual name and address as provided in your order. And they all ask for a response from each member.

During the last campaign, bundles of pink slips were dispatched…

It’s a not-so-subtle way of reminding members of Congress – Democrats and Republicans – who they work for, who pays their salaries and who sent them to Washington. It’s an effective way to let them know they might be back on the job market in November if they don’t read the political tea leaves and understand the frustration and anger being felt on Main Street.

“It’s time to shake these people up, again,” said Joseph Farah, WND founder and chief executive office. “Republicans need to hear it as much as Democrats. After all, they’re not holding Barack Obama accountable. He should have been impeached by the House, which is controlled by the so-called opposition party. Participating in this campaign is like taking part in one gigantic collective primal scream heard from coast to coast.”

…and cartloads…

If you want Congress to exercise its power to hold the White House accountable for abuse of the Constitution, for targeting political “enemies” with Internal Revenue Service harassment, making wounded warriors and other veterans wait months for medical services and for refusing to enforce immigration laws, here’s your opportunity to make your voice heard along with millions of others who share your anger and frustration.

The secret of its success is the delivery method. All pink slips are sent using FedEx, ensuring actual delivery to congressional offices. The messages are bundled for delivery by recipient to keep the costs down and to increase the impact.

“How else could you send every member of Congress a message in one minute for a total cost of $29.95?” asks Farah. “It can’t be done. We found the sweet spot for getting their attention in a dramatic way. It’s never been replicated – until now.”

…and truckloads.

If you’d like to bury Congress in pink slips again, now’s your chance.

For just $29.95 you can send an individualized notice to every member of Congress in the form of a “pink slip.” It will bear your name and your address and be sent and delivered to every member of the House and Senate, giving them plenty to think about before the November election.

Are you ready for another revolution in 2014? Only you can make it happen.

If your memory fails you, or if you never heard of the 2009 pink slip campaign, here are some points to highlight:

Pretty in pink slips – 7 million and counting!

Pink slips could paper path from NY to Washington

Historic! 850,000 ‘pink slips’ to Congress – in 3 days

Pink-slipping Congress wipes out paper supplies

Congressional news conference hails 5 million pink slips

Boxes, pallets, truckloads of pink slips going to Congress

Participate in the campaign

Call Toll-Free to Order:
If you prefer to order by phone, you can call our friendly, Midwestern customer service reps
toll-free at 1-800-4WND-COM (1-800-496-3266),
Monday-Friday, 9am-5pm Central.

IMAGINENSE POR 2 MINUTOS QUE ES LO QUE SE DEMORARAN EN LEER ESTO: IMAGINENSE QUE LOS EXTRATERRESTRES SECUESTRARON A OBAMA Y SE LO LLEVARON PARA SU PLANETA “TOM-KOLL” DE VISITA A 500 MILLONES DE ANOS LUZ DE USA Y QUE SU NAVE SE LES ROMPIO Y NO TIENEN MAS NAVES NI LA PUEDEN ARREGLAR, O QUE UN TRIBU DE CANIVALES DE AFRICA PRIMOS DE EL SE LO COMIERON EN UN AJIACO, O QUE LE CALLO EN LA CABEZA EL AVION PRESIDENCIAL EN UNA ISLA REMOTA DE HAWAII, O QUE LOS REPUBLICANOS SE LO COMIERON EN UN AJIACO EN EL CONGRESO, O SE LO LLEVO EL “CHUPACABRAS O EL “CHICHIRICU” O EL “COCO, O QUE EL MAGO DEL RINGLIN LO DESAPARECIO DE AVIAJE, O QUE NUNCA EXISTIO OBAMA, O QUE SE METIO EN LA BOLSA DE UN CANGURO UYENDOLE A MICHEL, O QUE SE LO COMIO EL TIBURON SANGRIENTO… AHHHHHH!!! QUE RICO TATA…
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño

“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

July 1, 2014

No 701      “EN  MI  OPINIóN”      Julio 1, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST”    Lázaro R González Miño Editor.

 Si tú no haces nada para evitar estos abusos del gobierno. El terminara tentándote como una gallina, para ver si tienes guevos… Y si estás dispuesto a usarlos.

“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño

 

Sigan ahí sin hacer nada, sin protestar contra la sanguijuela insaciable del gobierno y van a terminar teniendo que empeñar los calzoncillos y los blúmer para poder vivir aquí. Averigüen quienes fueron los congresistas del estado de la Florida y por favor empiecen a votar en contra de estos sinvergüenzas para que no salgan nunca más. Lázaro R González Miño.

Nelson Horta Reporta: Usuarios del Sun Pass recibirán un aumento en sus cuotas al transitar por las carreteras estatales

No Comments

July 1st, 2014

• El aumento es parte de una vieja ley aprobada en el 2007

MIAMI 1 DE JULIO DE 2014, nhr.com—En nelsonhortareporta.com siempre estamos vigilando todos lo que perjudique a los residentes del Sur de la Florida, y anoche conocimos algo que hasta el momento no se le había dado divulgación o al menos no se había alertado a los choferes.

Según las fuentes que anoche nos llamaron para alertarnos, a partir de hoy dia primero de julio, el Florida Sun Pass aumentará a sus usuarios un 1.5 por ciento en el costo por transitar en las carreteras estatales de la Florida.

El aumento será el resultado de una ley estatal aprobada en el 2007 que permite un ajuste anual de peaje basado en el índice de precios al consumidor, algo que no se ha anunciado, pero que ya entro en vigor.

De acuerdo con las fuentes, el cambio se comenzó a aplicar a la una de la madrugada de hoy primero de julio y tendrá un impacto para los choferes que transiten por el Sawgrass Expressway y Alligator Alley asi como el Florida Turnpike.

Lo irónico del nuevo aumento es que los que paguen en efectivo no se verán aumentado sus cuotas hasta el 2017, dijeron las fuentes.

Se proyecta que este nuevo aumento  genere al estado de $8 a $10 millones  más al año de los $755 que actualmente recauda por concepto de peaje en las carreteras estatales.

 

 

AMENPER: Control de Fronteras la simple solución

De nuevo vemos a Obama en el césped de la Casa Blanca, como veo a los perritos de los vecinos en mi césped. 

La similitud es que lo que me molesta no es Obama ni los perritos lo que me molesta es la mierda que producen.

De nuevo, y ya no es nada nuevo, Obama amenaza con la acción ejecutiva, porque según dice el Congreso no hace nada.

El congreso no hace lo que quiere Obama, y esto para Obama es no hacer nada.

Tanto el Congreso como el Senado hubiera apoyado una ley inmigratoria que tuviera un plan de vigilancia y control de las fronteras eficiente y verificado por instituciones independientes. Se le dijo a Obama, pero Obama como dicen en inglés, es “HIS WAY OR THE HIGHWAY” o sea lo que quiere o la carretera, y la carretera en este caso es….bueno tu sabes….ACCIÓN EJECUTIVA..

El proyecto de inmigración que apoyaba Marco Rubio incluía la posibilidad de legalización y eventual ciudadanía de once millones de indocumentados; pero condicionaba la residencia permanente a la seguridad fronteriza; imponía un plan de vigilancia en la frontera sur y establecía controles para futuros flujos migratorios.

Pero esta solución era muy fácil de aceptar en su primera parte, pero imposible para Obama y sus acólitos de aceptar la segunda parte porque es la solución que no quieren los demócratas que quieren que sigan viniendo interminablemente sus votantes potenciales.

Rubio enfrentó la oposición de miembros de su propio partido que relacionaban el proyecto de inmigración con una amnistía general y se oponían a abrir la vía a la nacionalización.  Pero evidentemente esto no se parece a una amnistía incondicional como la que equivocadamente implementó Ronald Reagan.  Marco Rubio, no sé si por la oposición del gobierno, o porque la estrategia era que sabía que el gobierno se iba a oponer al control de las fronteras que se proponía, retiró su apoyo al plan que quizás nunca pensó que se iba a realizar.

Reagan también reconoció que la amnistía incondicional no fue la solución después que la implantó.

La única solución sine qua non es el control de las fronteras, si no entran no hay problema.

Si no hubieran entrado 50,000 niños ilegalmente, no nos enfrentaríamos a un problema sentimental por la situación de esos niños.

Obama puede hablar hasta que se ponga cenizo, pero todos saben que el problema no es el congreso, el problema es Obama

 

 

Samitier: Honremos este 4 de Julio a las Heroínas de la Independencia de los Estados Unidos…

No Existe En La Historia De Este Mundo Un

Triunfo Revolucionario Realizado Por Los

“Plebeyos” (Los Pobres) Siempre Han Sido

Obra De “Los Nobles” (Los Ricos y Educados)

También Todas Las Revoluciones Han Recibido

AYUDA DE UN PAIS EXTRANJERO… Incluyendo

La De USA… De Francia y De España… y En

Particular De Las “Cubanas” Que Donaron El

Dinero para Pagar Los Soldados Antes De La

Batalla “DECISIVA” De Yorktown… 

El Dinero Lo Trajo Juan De Miralles Quien Era Amigo

De Washington y Murió En Ese Viaje De Pulmonía y

Fue Enterrado Con El Grado De General Muerto en

Campaña En El Pueblo Hightown, NJ. En Presencia

De Washington y Otros Dignatarios… También le

Trajo a Marta Washington Dulce De Guayaba…

que era uno de los Postres Preferido de los Washington…  

 

 

 

SAMITIER: Todo Lo Que Obama Hace Nos Lleva A La Quiebra… Económica y Moral…

2 Billones Para La Inmigración Ilegal

500 Millones Para Armar A Los

Terroristas Sirios y Ahora Iraq Quiere

1,200 Cohetes Cada Uno Cuesta $58,000.00

Para Tirarlos Desde Aviones Rusos…

Aún Recuerdo Cuando McCain Dijo:  “Las tropas Debían

De Estar 50 Años En Iraq”  El Obama y Los IGNORANTES

Se HORRORIZARON… Ahora… ven que el esfuerzo de

CIVILIZARLOS… fracasó… EXCLUSIVAMENTE por OBAMA…

Que RETIRO  Y La Prensa NO LO DICE…CLARAMENTE…

Pero Nadie Se HORRORIZA por tener tropas en Alemania desde

1944… 70 ANNOS…

AQUÍ TIENEN LA NOTICIA…

It´s great to go shooting, with someone else´s money!

Now, we are arming both ISIS and the Iraqi Shia Army!

What could possibly go wrong??

 

Iraq, Out of Hellfire Missiles, 

Asks US for 1,400 More

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/06/iraq-out-of-hellfire-missiles-asks-us-for-1400-more/

 

NOT WORTH IT: Every Hellfire missile fired in Afghanistan costs USD $58,000

Read more: http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2010/12/01/not-worth-it-every-hellfire-missile-fired-in-afghanistan-costs-usd58-000.html#ixzz36C2dJe94

 

 

 

AMENPER: ¿Que cosa es lo que no funciona?

Hace un par de años, el presidente Barack Obama dijo a una audiencia en Osawatomie, Kansas:

“Nos dicen el mercado se hará cargo de todo. … Pero aquí está el problema: No funciona. Nunca ha funcionado”. … Creer lo que el presidente y muchos otros dicen sobre qie el mercado no está funcionando requiere que uno sea groseramente ignorante o deshonesto.

Las características principales de un sistema de libre mercado son los derechos de la propiedad privada y la propiedad privada de los medios de producción. Además, hay un alto grado de intercambio voluntario pacífico.  
El empresario en el proceso de avanzar en su negocio crea muchos más empleos que los que crea el sistema socialista con su economía controlada por el gobierno.  En los sistemas socialistas están severamente limitados los derechos de propiedad privada y de supresión de la propiedad. depende el probado deficiente control de los medios de producción del gobierno.

Nunca ha habido un sistema económico de mercado puramente libre, al igual que nunca ha habido un sistema puramente comunista. Sin embargo, podemos clasificar las economías y ver cuáles son más eficientes, podemos ver si el mercado libre del espectro económico es mejor o peor que los que están más cerca del comunismo.

 Vamos a intentarlo leyendo un informe de “Libertad Económica en el Mundo”,

De acuerdo con el informe de 2012 “Libertad Económica en el Mundo”, las naciones de clasificación en el cuartil superior en lo que respecta a la libertad económica tenían un PIB per cápita de $ 37,691 por habitante en 2010, en comparación con $ 5.188 para aquellos en el cuartil inferior. En las naciones más libres, el ingreso promedio del 10 por ciento más pobre de su población era $ 11.382. En las naciones menos libres, fue $ 1,209. Cabe destacar que el ingreso promedio de los 10 por ciento más pobre de las naciones económicamente más libres es más del doble del ingreso promedio de las personas en los países menos libres.

La esperanza de vida es de 79,5 años en las naciones más libres y 61,6 años en los menos libres. Las libertades políticas y civiles son considerablemente mayores en las naciones económicamente libres que en las naciones de libre empresa.

Los izquierdistas podrían argumentar que el libre mercado no ayuda a los pobres. Ese argumento no puede ni siquiera pasar la prueba de olor, sencillamente apesta. ¿Se imaginan que Dios te condenó a una vida de pobreza, porque  dio la opción a un país a que fuera pobre?

¿Qué país elegirías? ¿Un país socialista o un país de libre empresa?

Para ayudarle en su elección, aquí están los hechos de en el informe “La comprensión de la pobreza en los Estados Unidos:

Hechos sorprendentes sobre “El Mal de América”

El ochenta por ciento de los hogares pobres estadounidenses tienen aire acondicionado. Casi tres cuartas partes tienen un coche o camión, y el 31 por ciento tienen dos o más. Casi dos tercios tienen televisión por cable o satélite. La mitad tiene una o más computadoras. Cuarenta y dos por ciento son propietarios de sus casas. El promedio de los pobres de América tiene más espacio para vivir que la persona no pobre típico en Suecia, Francia o el Reino Unido El noventa y seis por ciento de los padres pobres afirmó que sus hijos nunca tuvieron hambre. La conclusión es que hay poco o nada de pobreza material en los EE.UU. ¿¨Por qué?¿si el sistema de libre empresa es tan malo?

En el momento del nacimiento de la nación americana, eran pobres, pero se estableció una estructura institucional de los mercados libres y un gobierno limitado y se hizo un país rico. Esas riquezas se han logrado mucho antes del gobierno de hoy que Obama dice que es difícil de manejar. Nuestro mercado libre y el gobierno limitado, más que nada explica nuestra riqueza.

La experiencia de Obama en el mercado, es inexistente, su única experiencia es como Organizador comunitario utilizando el dinero de los contribuyentes que generan la riqueza del país con sus impuestos,  Esto lo hace temer un concepto basado en su ignorancia, sin una base de datos que existen pero que no quiere o no puede ver.

La mayor parte de nuestros principales problemas son el resultado de Gobierno. Los estadounidenses deben reconocer que este gobierno con restricciones, ignorando la separación de poderes, gobernando por decisión ejecutiva, el capitalismo de amigos que se adaptan a las filosofías económicas fracasadas, los mercados con trabas, son la causa de nuestros problemas económicos actuales- Esto es el por qué los EE.UU. se ha hundido a la categoría de 17 en el 2013 según el informe de “Libertad Económica en el Mundo”

Esta es la realidad palpable y comprobada con las estadísticas, no las filosofías sin base que nos quiere imponer la mentalidad socialista de Obama.

Si Obama el sistema de libre mercado funciona, siempre ha funcionado, lo que no funciona es Obama.

 

 

Nestor Dan: SOVEREIN…Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence? Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died.

Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned.Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another had two sons captured.

Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War.

They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.

What kind of men were they?

Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists.


Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners; men of means, well educated, but they signed the Declaration of Independence
knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured.


Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags.

Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty
was his reward.

Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and Middleton.

At the battle of Yorktown , Thomas Nelson, Jr., noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was
destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.

Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months.

John Hart was driven from his wife’s bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning home to
find his wife dead and his children vanished. 
 

So, take a few minutes while enjoying your 4th of July holiday and silently thank these patriots. It’s not much to ask for the price they paid.

Remember: freedom is never free!

I hope you will show your support by sending this to as many people as you can, please. It’s time we get the word out that patriotism is NOT a sin, and the Fourth of July has more to it than beer, picnics and baseball games.

 

 

Ricardo Samitier: DESPIERTEEEEN!!!

S. O. S. !!!

El Distrito Escolar de Escondido en California pidio a sus 5 mil habitantes unos 6 millones de dolares para ubicar a 93 “ninos invasores” en las escuelas. Hubo protestas y demandas para k los regresen a sus paises pork el pueblo no puede mas con sus gastos.
Hace 2 dias Perla Tabares Hantman pidio millones de dolares para poder ubicar “ninos invasores” en las escuelas de Miami pues eso no esta incluido en el presupuesto escolar. Perla Tabares tiene 14 anos en el puesto y quiere reelegirse en Noviembre. 
Si no estamos dispuestos a llevar a nuestras casas y mantener a esos “ninos” SIN AYUDA DEL WELFARE Y SIN PEDIR UN CENTAVO A NADIE, entonces llamemos a los politicos y dejemos saber que no vamos a votar por ellos si no los devuelven a sus paises.
Distrito Escolar Miami, Perla Tabares Hantman 305-995-1334 
Gobernador Florida Rick Scott (850) 488-7146
Alcalde de Miami Carlos Jimenez 305-375-2911

 

ADEMAS DE ESO Obama amenaza al pueblo de EEUU que va a firmar una Reforma ejecutiva si los Reublicanos no aprueban legalizar a todos los ilegales.

Cuando? en la historia de esta nacion hubo un presidente que haya amenazado a su propio pueblo? El trabajo de un presidente es cuidar la nacion y su pueblo. Obama actua como si no hubiese 3 poderes en esta nacion. 

 

DESPIERTEEEEEN !!!  Es un deber ciudadano votar y BOTAR A LA BASURA  a todos los que no trabajan o trabajan mal, vigilar y exigir que no haya fraude,

                                                          TODOS DEBEMOS SER 

                                                  ACTIVISTAS POR NUESTRA NACION

Olga Grinan

 

 

 

 

Nestor Dan, Joseph Goldberg, Rolando Cardenas: Montana  Restaurant    

 

The radio station “America FM” was doing one of its ‘Is Anyone Listening?’ bits this morning.

  

The first question was: “Ever have a celebrity come up with the ‘Do you know who I am? ‘routine.”

  

A woman called in and said that a few years ago, while visiting her cattle rancher uncle in Billings, MT,

 

she had occasion to go to dinner at a restaurant that does not take reservations. The wait was about 45 minutes.

 

Many local ranchers and their wives were waiting.

  

Ted Turner and his ex-wife JaneFonda came in the restaurant and wanted a table.

 

The hostess informed them that they’d have to wait 45 minutes.

 

Jane Fonda asked the hostess, ‘Do you know who I am?’

  

The hostess answered, ‘Yes, but you’ll have to wait 45 minutes.’

  

Then Jane asked if the manager was in.  When the manager came out, he asked, ‘May I help you?’

  

‘Do you know who we are?’ both Tedand Jane asked.

  

Yes, but these folks have been waiting, and I can’t put you ahead of them.’

  

Then Ted asked to speak to the owner. The owner came out, andJane again asked, ‘Do you know who I am?’

  

The owner answered, ‘Yes, I do.  Do you know who I am?  I am the owner of  this restaurant and I am aVietnam Veteran.  Not only will you not get a table ahead of my friends and neighbors who have been waiting here, but you also will not be eating in my restaurant tonight or any other night.  Good bye.”

   

Only in America.  Is this a great country or what?

   

To all who received this, this is a true story and the name of the steak house is: 

 

Sir Scott’s Oasis Steakhouse

   204 W. Main, Manhattan, MT 59741 

(406) 284-6929

   

If you ever get there, give this fellow a sharp salute, buy yourself a steak and tip the waitress. They have ten steaks on their simple menu,from 32 oz. down to 12 oz.  Toothpicks on every table!

 

 

Gatria: ¿ Crisis Humanitaria o Invasion ? … Usted Decide

Miles y miles de niños y adultos de varios paises entran ilegalmente en los Estados Unidos. Cientos cruzan diariamente.

  Obama lo llama ” Crisis Humanitaria “, pero la verdad es que estamos

  siendo invadidos.

En algunos paises de CentroAmerica dicen que el Presidente Obama dijo que todos los niños podian ingresar a Estados Unidos.        

 Mientras todo esto sucede el Gobierno dice que mas del 40% de la

 poblacion vive en pobreza y que unos 2 millones homeless.

 

       ¿ A donde quieren llevar el Pais ?

Obama to Seek $2 Billion to Deal with Illegal Surge on Border

President Barack Obama will seek more than $2 billion to respond to the flood of immigrants illegally entering the U.S. through the Rio Grande Valley area of Texas and ask for new powers to deal with returning immigrant children apprehended while traveling without their parents, a White House official said Saturday.

With Obama looking to Congress for help with what he has called an “urgent humanitarian situation,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi visited a Border Patrol facility in Brownsville that held unaccompanied children. More than 52,000 unaccompanied children, most from Central America, have been apprehended entering the U.S. illegally since October.

“The fact is these are children — children and families,” Pelosi said. “We have a moral responsibility to address this in a dignified way.”

 

 

 

 

Jesus Marzo Fernandez: EL GRAN NEGOCIO [SOLO EN CUBA]‏

LA CORRUPCION CORROE A TODA LA SOCIEDAD
AHORA SE HA DESCUBIERTO, QUE LA VENTA DE 
PRUEBAS DE INGRESOS, ADEMAS DE SER UN NEGOCIO
MILLONARIO, PRACTICAMENTE ABARCABA A TODOS
LOS CENTROS DE ENSENANZA.
 
DE VERDAD, QUE EL HOMBRE NUEVO SALIO “”FU””

Cambios en sedes de exámenes de ingreso

Sábado, 28/06/2014 21:49 PM. Por Tribuna de La Habana en la sección

La Comisión de Ingreso Provincial de La Habana anuncia cambios en las sedes de los exámenes de ingreso a la Educación Superior para la Convoca-toria Extraordinaria. La Comisión precisa a los estudiantes que se presentarán a la Convocatoria Extraordinaria, algunos cambios en las sedes de aplicación de las pruebas. Estos obedecen a la reducción de las instituciones donde se aplicarán.
En la IFAL-Colina, en la Universidad de La Habana, se examinarán el Curso por Encuentro del Instituto de Farmacia y Alimentos; los Autorizados; el colegio universitario de la Universidad de Ciencias Pedagógicas; colegio universitario de la Universidad de La Habana; IPVCE Vladimir Ilich Lenin; Educación a Distancia; Colegio San Gerónimo; Concurso del ISA; curso por encuentro del ISA y EPA-ISA. Los Institutos Preuniversitarios se agruparán de la siguiente forma:
IPU Tomás David Royo se incorpora al IPU Saúl Delgado; el IPU Francisco Miranda y el Cepero Bonilla se unen en el IPU René O´Reiné; el IPU Conrado Duani en el 12 de septiembre; el IPU Ramón Padrón se concentra en el Roberto Labrada; el IPU Jesús Suárez Gayol se une al Manolito Aguiar y el IPU Julio Antonio Mella se incorpora al IPU José Martí de La Habana del Este.
Los estudiantes de los preuniversitarios Camilitos se unirán en la Escuela Militar Camilo Cienfuegos de Capdevilla.
Las sedes no mencionadas se mantienen en los mismos lugares donde realizaron la convocatoria ordinaria. Se recuerda las fechas de los exámenes: Lunes 30 de junio, Matemática; Miércoles 2 de julio, Español y Viernes 4 de julio, Historia. La hora de inicio es a las 9:00 a.m. Los estudiantes deben presentar el carné de identidad en buen estado de conservación.

EL HOMBRE NUEVO SALIO “”FU””  LA CONSIGNA NACIONAL

PERDON Y OLVIDO, AQUI NO HA PASADO NADA.

 

 “FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”

“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño