No 650 “En mi opinión” Mayo 1, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor
“EMO” EL FANTASMA DE BENGHAZY. CUANDO ELLOS PIENSAN QUE LO ENTERRARON BIEN PROFUNDO… SALE POR LAS NOCHES Y LES JALA LAS PATAS. QUE CLASE DE MENTIROSOS PATOLOGICOS. LRGM
Yesterday we reported on the revelation that the White House made a conscious decision to blame the sacking of our Benghazi consulate on a silly and sparsely distributed internet video called Innocence of Muslims. In an email distributed by Ben Rhodes, senior policy makers, among them Susan Rice, are told to 1) blame the internet video for the violence, 2) deflect attention from greater policy failures (one presumes he’s talking about everything the Obama regime had touched), and 3) emphasize Obama’s cool and collected leadership.
[It was noted in the post yesterday that Ben Rhodes is the brother of CBS News David Rhodes and this might explain some of the difficulty former CBS reporter Sharly Atkisson had in getting Benghazi stories aired on CBS.]
Now that we know that the White House was actively involved in pushing a blatant lie about the genesis of the Benghazi attack in order to deflect blame it is only fair to ask who came up with the story to begin with.
What we know
A two minute clip of the Innocence of Muslims video was shown on Egyptian television on September 9.
On September 11, an Egyptian mob (actual or astroturf, no one knows because astroturf mobs were the norm in Egypt under the Muslim Brotherhood) demonstrated outside, and on, the US Embassy in Cairo.
From a timeline produced by Factcheck.org, we know that there were no demonstrations in Benghazi on September 11, the day of the attack.
2:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (8:30 p.m. Benghazi time): U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens steps outside the consulate to say goodbye to a Turkish diplomat. There are no protesters at this time. (“Everything is calm at 8:30,” a State Department official would later say at an Oct. 9 background briefing for reporters. “There’s nothing unusual. There has been nothing unusual during the day at all outside.”)
The attack began at around 4pm, EDT, by 8:30pm our ambassador was dead, at 10pm Hillary Clinton issued this statement:
I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.
This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.
Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet [my emphasis]. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.
In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.
On September 14, Ben Rhodes drafted the talking points for Susan Rice and others.
While Rhodes was helping the lie get its trousers on for its ride around the world, Hillary Clinton was at Dover AFB to witness the return of the coffins of the Americans killed in Benghazi. She had this to say:
This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with. It is hard for the American people to make sense of that because it is senseless, and it is totally unacceptable.
On September 15, the man who produced Innocence of Muslims, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, was arrested on parole violations.
Hillary as Ground Zero for the Internet video lie
The State Department was keenly aware of the Innocence of Muslims video, its airing on Egyptian television, and the demonstrations at the US Embassy in Cairo. One presumes Susan Rice might have known about the video, if staff communications between State and its Ambassador the UN, Susan Rice, existed, however, that presumption might be a stretch:
Rice has been consistently silent on other important issues and ineffective when she does engage. She skipped Security Council meetings when Israel needed defending and even failed to show up for the emergency session on the Gaza Flotilla incident.
Rice didn’t even show up for the first two emergency Security Council meetings on the unfolding Arab Spring revolution last year. Rice stayed silent when Iran was elected to the U.N. women’s committee, she didn’t call out Libya when it was elected to the Human Rights Council, she was absent from the Haiti crisis meeting and was a no-show for the last open meeting scheduled before the planned UN vote to recognize Palestinian statehood. When she actually does show up, she is a miserable failure.
We also know that the State Department was aware that there were no demonstrations in Benghazi and all had been calm when the mission there closed for the day.
The attack on Benghazi occurred around 4pm, Washington time. This means that Hillary, Rice, and all of State and the NSC were at their desks receiving reports in near real time. The statement Hillary released was not something cobbled together in the middle of the night. It was drafted with the full complement of staff at their desks and represents a deliberate distortion of the facts known to Hillary at the time she released the statement. At the time, the Obama regime was under a lot of criticism for turning what had been a friendly nation, Egypt, over to our enemies. The sugar high of overthrowing the hapless and frightened Muammar Qaddafi and seeing him replaced by al Qaeda along with Obama’s incomprehensible Syrian strategy was calling into question the competence of the regime. Hillary had to have known how damaging it would be for al Qaeda franchises, enabled by Obama’s policy to carve out training areas in Libya, to be blamed for the attack. Hence the original statement issued shortly after our ambassador was killed.
Sometime after 10:30 pm on September 11, the official policy of the United States became the lie of the internet video. It was repeated when Clinton went to Dover to welcome home the remains of the slain Americans. Now, though, the gravity of the lie seems to have been weighing on Clinton. If you were alive during the Clinton regime, you learned to carefully parse each and every word uttered by both Bill and Hillary. Their parsimony with the truth became encapsulated in the statement “it depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”
Here you will note that while Hillary seems to blame Innocence of Muslims video… but does she?
We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with.
In the context of what was being said and the occasion, the listener could not help but understand her as blaming the video for the deaths. In reality, her statement shows she made two disconnected statements, both of which were factually true. There was an attack on Benghazi. There was rage and violence directed against at least one embassy. She doesn’t link them as she did the night of September 11.
From the beginning, Hillary Clinton knew there were no protests in Benghazi. When the consulate was attacked a decision was made, ultimately okayed by Hillary, to blame Innocence of Muslims for the attack. She did this because the regime’s foreign policy in the Arab world was in shambles and the attack in Benghazi was made possible by that foreign policy. She knew that as Secretary of State she couldn’t blame anyone else and this would kill her chances of winning the presidency in 2016. Despite having time to think about it and walk the statement back as something drafted based on incomplete information, she pushed the lie forward. The regime had adopted this lie as its version of events by September 14 and sent it out in talking points.
There is no other conclusion to reach other than Hillary Clinton was the author of the lie about what caused the attack in Benghazi and she must be held accountable for that.
Reportero Ross Palombo, descubre gastos excesivos en salarios autorizados por el alcalde Carlos Giménez
• El reportero del Canal 10 hace interesantes revelaciones
MIAMI 1 DE MAYO DE 2014, nhr,com—La investigación llevada a cabo por el periodista del canal 10 de Miami, Ross Palombo sobre el derroche millonario de la administración de Miami Dade pagando salarios a empleados, sin trabajar, ha preocupado al comisionado Xavier Suarez quien en las últimas horas envió un memorándum al alcalde Carlos Giménez pidiéndole todos los documentos que presentó Palombo en sus reportajes especiales.
De acuerdo con la investigación, los números son impresionantes, millones de dólares han sido pagados a empleados del condado que ni siquiera trabajan en los puestos que han sido asignados. La mayoría han sido aprobado por el alcalde Carlos Giménez, y cuando se le preguntó al alcalde si esto había sido derrochador, solo dijo, “de ninguna manera”, absolutamente no”.
Los documentos obtenidos demuestran que $21’046,916 dólares fueron gastados en “licencias administrativas” en el año 2013, Las reglas del condado definen esas licencias administrativos como “permiso de ausencia del trabajo con sueldo”.
Algunas de estas ausencias eran simplemente para asuntos personales como ir a un funeral o actividades del sindicato, la mayoría de los salarios “gratuitamente”—alrededor de $11’261,073–fueron pagados y utilizados a discreción del alcalde Giménez.
De acuerdo con Giménez “este tipo de licencia con pago, generalmente es dada a aquellos empleados que realmente han trabajado por adelantado, trabajando horas extras sin haberlas cobrado”.
El alcalde profundizó mas en el tema diciendo que “Si alguien que, en otras palabras, que trabaje 60 horas en una semana y no se le paga extra por eso, luego se le da algún tiempo libre para equilibrar su trabajo”.
A la pregunta de por qué ordenó pagar por los días feriados, Giménez respondió que ha sido una política del condado y no cree que se trata de un desperdicio de los fondos, “absolutamente no”, respondió.
En el memorándum el comisionado Xavier Suarez le pide al alcalde Giménez,
“Por favor, identifique todos los documentos obtenidos por el Canal 10, utilizados en su reportaje investigativo, en el que se menciona el pago total de $21, 045,916 millones por concepto de pagos de “Licencia Administrativa” a empleados del Condado Miami-Dade.
Tengo entendido que las cifras fueron proveídas en una hoja de cálculo (spreadsheet), titulada “Licencia Administrativa” del año calendario 2013.
Le agradecería la respuesta a estas preguntas antes de la Sesión Ejecutiva pautada para el Jueves, 8 de mayo del 2014.” Concluye texto.
Según nelsonhortareporta.com, otros comisionados están molestos con este derroche de fondos a los miembros del equipo del alcalde Giménez, mientras que el mismo quiere cerrar bibliotecas y amenaza con hacer recortes a programas sociales y cesantías.
“EMO” ¿Hasta cuando los votantes de Miami van a seguir eligiendo a este tipo de funestos gobernantes para que hagan estas mamarrachadas? ¿Es que no se cansan que se rían de ellos o es que les gusta, que usen su dinero festinadamente? LRGM
AMEMENPER: Documento Secreto Revelado. Un vocero del Departamento de estado ha filtrado la noticia de las duras medidas de contingencia que la administración implementará contra Rusia en caso de que haga una acción directa contra Ucrania.
Plan de Contingencia en el caso de que Rusia tome acción contra Ucrania.
1. No se servirá ensalada Rusa en las recepciones de la Casa Blanca
2. También se prohibiría el uso de Caviar Beluga en las comidas de Michelle y Barry.
3.Se quitaría a Vladimir Putin de “amigo” en Facebook
4, El presidente Obama anunciaría que no consideraría a la Universidad de Moscú cuando se presenten los juegos del torneo de la NCAA en el 1915.
5, En todos los futuros discursos del Secretario Kerry, declarará que no le importa si Sebastopol se inunda por la alza de los niveles del mar.
6.Ni el presidente Obama ni ningún oficial estadounidense jugará en un campo de golf de Moscú.
7. El internet del personal del gobierno será reprogramado para no permitir que los empleados hagan cita con muchachas rusas.
8.Todas las líneas rojas del presidente para Rusia serán hechas en arena negra en vez de arena blanca.
9,La primera dama Michelle Obama cancelará los viajes a Rusia durante sus giras mundiales.
10. Se prohibirá a los soldados estadounidenses jugar a la ruleta rusa con sus pistolas.
Las mismas fuentes que informaron de estas 10 importantes medidas, han dicho que el Presidente Putin se haya profundamente preocupado por las repercusiones de las vigorosas acciones del documento de contingencia de Kerry y Obama.
LUIS CARRIL: LE ZUMBA EL AGUACATE PODRIDO… A esta hora y con estos muertos. Qué clase de cotorra entro en la jaula.
Samitier:Se Ha Hecho Usted La Pregunta…
¿Por Qué Estados Unidos Es El Único
Que Persigue A Sus Antiguos Aliados?
Todos los meses leemos sobre la DEPORTACIÓN de un antiguo aliado militar de Los Estados Unidos quien había recibido asilo… después de la llegada al poder de las llamadas“DEMOCRACIAS” todas ellas con la ayudaDIRECTA DE EL GOBIERNO DE USA…
No olvidemos que para convencer a Pinochet que hiciera el PLEBISCITO… la CIA encontró TRES UVAS CON CIANURO y USA declaró un EMBARGO DE FRUTAS DE CHILE que causo un derrumbe de $350 millones y las uvas chilenas se regalaban en Santiago…
Pinochet que era un PATRIOTA… PREGUNTO; ¿QUE HAY QUE HACER PARA QUE SE LEVANTE EL EMBARGO? La contestas fue clara: UN PLEBISCITO… y los Estados Unidos por medio de la CIA gasto más de $100 MILLONES en las elecciones para derrotar a Pinochet…
Pero, ¿Por que USA DEPORTA a los militares que les concedió asilo??? Los politiqueros comunistas globalistas que gobiernan USA… lo hacen para darle un EJEMPLO a los militares de que ellos TIENEN QUE OBEDECER A LOS GLOBALISTAS… y que ellos son los
Únicos que pueden dictar a QUIEN SE PERSIGUE y a QUIEN NO…
Recuerden que el Golpe de Estado Contra Chávez Fue desautorizado por Bush… También el de Honduras por la CLINTON y OBAMA…
¿Por Qué No Se Juzga Y Persigue A Los Antiguos Gobernantes Comunistas?
En ningún país comunista, han encarcelado a los criminales? Por qué?
Porque los comunistas son todos Globalistas!En el campo comunista le llaman INTERNACIONALISTAS… Los Globalistas odian a todos los países! Muchos de los que fueron miembros de los gobiernos comunistas, están ahora en Bruselas como “PARLAMENTARIOS”de la Unión Europea.
Incluyendo 8 alemanes de la ALEMANIA DEL ESTE!!! Que siguen chupando de los trabajadores.
Siguen borrando la historia y repitiendo las mentiras en la Prensa y por las Instituciones y sobre todo por profesores universitarios… Pero no hay que ir lejos para eso… La Universidad Internacional de la Florida en Miami… es UN NIDO DE GLOBALISTAS…
Su plan, es borrar las fronteras, para gobernar el mundo. Este plan, es tan VIEJO que aparece en la BIBLIA como la Torre de Babel, un planINSPIRADO POR SATANÁS.
Desde la Caída de la Unión Soviética La Supuesta “Madre del Comunismo En 1989
Según los PERIÓDICOS… Estados Unidos LE HA DADO LA ESPALDA a los países de LATINO AMÉRICA ya que NADIE PUEDE NEGAR que los que hoy gobiernan son los antiguos TERRORISTAS DE LOS 60 y 70 que eran entonces los amigos de FIDEL CASTRO…
La Verdad Es Otra…CASTRO SOBREVIVIÓ la caída de la URSS gracias a la ayuda Norte Americana y los gobiernos DE TERRORISTAS llegaron al poder GRACIAS A LA PERSECUCIÓN que USA hizo de los militares y sus ALIADOS en todos esos países…
En Que Niegue Las Anteriores VERDADES
Es Un BURÓCRATA Mantenido Por La CIA…
Bombshell: Declassified Emails Reveal Massive Benghazi Cover-Up!
I have said it all along: Every fiber of my being believes that the Obama administration coached Susan Rice after the Benghazi terror attack to make sure she portrayed the President in a good light during her multiple Sunday-morning talk show appearances.
There was just too much at stake for the White House not to be involved in drafting the talking points. Remember that when asked who crafted the talking points, White House officials tried to blame the FBI and CIA, who immediately reminded us that these agencies create intelligence estimates, not partisan political talking points.
Everything pointed to a deliberate attempt to deceive the American people during a contested election, but there was still no evidence to prove that… until now!
The organization Judicial Watch does an excellent job of filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and taking the administration to court when they try to stonewall. The latest batch of 100+ administration emails from one of these FOIA requests actually shows that top advisors in the White House were directly involved with coaching Susan Rice on how to make the President look as good as possible during her post-Benghazi interviews.
Her job should have been to inform the American people of what happened in Benghazi, Libya to cause four brave Americans – including my personal friend, Ambassador Chris Stevens – to lose their lives. Susan Rice should have provided us with the most up-to-date declassified information about the attack.
She did none of these things. Instead, she perpetuated a lie to the American people in order to make Barack Hussein Obama appear tough-on-terrorism before an election. She blamed the “spontaneous attack” on an inflammatory, low-budget YouTube video even though she knew this to be a lie!
At the center of this new discovery is a man by the name of Ben Rhodes. Mr. Rhodes is an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications. Essentially, he takes foreign policy events and crafts talking points in order to paint the president in the best-possible light.
On September 14, 2012, Mr. Rhodes emailed Susan Rice instructing her on what to include when speaking that weekend on the Sunday morning political talk shows. The email’s subject line read “RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET” and it was sent to a number of White House officials including Press Secretary and perpetual-liar Jay Carney.
At the top of the list of talking-points, this email directs Susan Rice to “underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”
The Congressional investigations into this cover-up have shown that long before this September 14 email was drafted, the intelligence community knew that the YouTube video narrative was never accurate. People don’t spontaneously gather in protest with rocket-propelled grenades in their back pockets.
Additionally, Rice was instructed to tell the American people that the administration “find[s] it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence.”
The email chain ends with another White House staffer planning a conference call for that Saturdayafternoon to “help prepare Susan for her interviews.”
Remember when the Obama administration claimed that the CIA was responsible for pushing the idiotic YouTube video narrative? This email proves that was a LIE!
Remember when the Obama administration promised that there was never an effort to mislead the American people during an election year? This email proves that was a LIE!
Remember when the Obama administration claimed it had no involvement in coaching Susan Rice to lie on camera in front of the American people? The damn email’s subject line reads “PREP call with Susan”! This was a complete LIE!
The problem is that the line between national security and reelection duties is often blurred or non-existent all together. That explains why a national security adviser would encourage a sitting Ambassador to the United Nations to deliver incorrect and false talking points on national television!
This is truly despicable. Rather than doing their jobs and providing the best declassified intelligence to the American people, these rats in the White House put partisan politics above national security!
This is the smoking gun! This proves, beyond a doubt, that not only did the Obama administration coach Susan Rice prior to her television appearances but they coached her to deliberately mislead the American people!
These released emails show that the White House had one goal and it was not to disseminate credible information to the American people. The White House’s single goal was to make the president look good while blaming the violence on a low-budget YouTube video.
This makes me sick to my stomach, but there is nothing in these released emails that I didn’t already suspect. We have known for a while just how low the Obama administration will stoop to come out on top, but I guess part of me desperately wanted to believe that the President of the United States wouldn’t play politics with the lives of four Americans… I was wrong.
The Democrats call the Benghazi investigation nothing but a “GOP witch hunt.” Democrats in Congress are doing everything in their power to derail these Congressional committees because every new document brings the corruption closer and closer to the President himself.
We cannot allow the Democrats to get in between the American people and the truth! They want nothing more than to silence us and force us to just accept their narrative. That is something that we cannot do! We cannot stop until every ounce of corruption behind the Benghazi cover-up is revealed and those responsible for deceiving the American people are put behind bars!
Dick Morris: Yes, Rick Perry Can; Krauthammer: Media Will Ignore Benghazi Exposé; NYT’s Dowd to Obama: Stop Whining
Charles Krauthammer: Benghazi Email Is Cover-Up ‘Smoking Gun’
Wednesday, 30 Apr 2014 11:08 AM
By Nick Sanchez
Pulitzer-prize winning columnist Charles Krauthammer said that a White House email revealed through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit is “the smoking document” that proves the administration intentionally covered up the truth about the 2012 attacks in Benghazi.
Krauthammer appeared on Fox News’ “Special Report with Bret Baier” Tuesday to discuss in specific a Sept. 14, 2012, email from deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes to then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and White House press secretary Jay Carney.
The email sought to prep Rice for her appearance on Sunday news shows where she would explain to the public for the first time the details of what happened when over a hundred gunmen attacked the American diplomatic mission, killing four of its members.
The email advises Rice to explain the attack as a response to an anti-Muslim YouTube video created by an Egyptian-born Coptic Christian living in Los Angeles.
In the email, Rhodes tells Rice “To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.” He says her job is, “To reinforce the President and Administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges,” two months ahead of the Presidential election.
Krauthammer explained to the show’s panel that, “We now have the smoking document, which is the White House saying, ‘We’re pushing the video because we don’t want to blame it on the failure of our policies,’ which is what anybody who looked at this assumed all the way through.”
Editor’s Note: Weird Trick Adds Up to $1,000 to Your Social Security Checks
He continued, saying, “Before an election, Obama is saying GM is alive, Al-Qaida is dead. He’s running essentially the foreign policy issue, on which the whole campaign is based, is one that says he killed bin Laden, Al-Qaida is on the run.”
The email from Rhodes was revealed Tuesday after Judicial Watch won its 2013 Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the U.S. State Department.
In a statement released Wednesday, the Obama administration responded:
“Unlike those who insist on politicizing the events in Benghazi, our focus remains on ensuring that a tragedy like this isn’t repeated in Libya or anywhere else in the world. In our view, these documents only serve to reinforce what we have long been saying: that in the days after September 11, 2012, we were concerned by unrest occurring across the region and that we provided our best assessment of what was happening at the time.”
Concluding, Krauthammer said the document isn’t likely to make waves in the media. “I know what’s going to happen. The mainstream media will say ‘Oh, it’s so complicated,’ and they are not going to look into this.”
WESTERN CENTER FOR JOURNALISM.
“Battered President Barack Obama is fighting desperately for his political life as a tidal wave of anger, distrust and resentment sweeps America, resulting in a growing crusade for his impeachment.”
That’s right, in addition to dozens of elected officials… and Hollywood celebrities… a major nationwide publication is now openly speculating that Barack Obama is headed for impeachment.
And other sources are saying that politicians are finally starting to talk behind the scenes… in hushed whispers… and yes, they’re talking about impeachment. There is no denying it. We are on the verge of something huge.
And we must strike again while the iron is still hot. Congress must receive a flood of faxes and calls right now and we’re not just taking our demands to the so-called GOP Leadership, but to the 50 Members of the House and Senate who are bona-fide Tea Party Members.
“We Must Have The Support Of The American People In Order To Have Impeachment.” -Rep. Michelle Bachmann
Michele Bachmann hit the nail on the head when she recently uttered those words.
As a matter of fact, we can say without reservation that the only thing prohibiting Congress from removing Barack Obama from office right now is their delusion that you won’t support it.
But you are starting to change that delusion. The quote at the top of the article, by the way, comes from The Globe and this tabloid also claims that the realization that impeachment is close at hand is driving Obama “to the brink” and that he’s “crazed by the way things are spiraling out of control.”
They’re not the only one. The National Enquirer, recently went so far as to report that fears of impeachment are taking a toll on Obama’s marriage and that Barack Obama roams the halls of the White House late at night and talks to a portrait of Abraham Lincoln for guidance.
Now, we know what you’re thinking… but in spite of the fact that the tabloids are actually right more often than not when it comes to political dish… we’re not asking you to rely upon reports from supermarket tabloids.
Instead, we’re asking you to rely on what Bachmann says… and we’re asking you to rely on what scores of elected officials and public figures, who have recently started talking about impeachment, are saying.
And know that if you really want Barack Obama gone… know that the time is close at hand but that there’s only one way to make him go… DIRECT ACTION.
And Yes… Others Are Openly Talking About Impeachment.
You already know what Bachmann said, so here’s just a few examples of what others are saying:
“Never in my life did I ever believe that our country would be taken over by people, like the people who are running it at this day… I don’t think that this man [Obama] will make it through his term. I THINK HE WILL BE IMPEACHED.”– Movie Actor Steven Segal
At the fourth annual Statesman of the Year dinner that was hosted by the Sarasota Florida GOP, a man in the audience yelled out to Senator Ted Cruz;“What does it take to impeach him?” When the massive applause finally died down, Cruz boldly stated: “It takes 218 votes in the House of Representatives.”
“Barack Obama should be impeached… The man has committed crimes that do not warrant his staying in office.” – Texas Lt. Governor David Dewhurst
“The case for impeaching and removing President Obama grows stronger each week… His abuse of power has become so frequent and brazen that it is becoming recognized as the trademark of his presidency.” -Former Congressman Tom Tancredo
Congressman Steve Stockman stated recently that he’s considering filing Article of Impeachment because “Obama defiantly vowed not only to radically expand the reach of government from cradle to grave, but to smash the Constitution’s restrictions on government power while doing it. His goal is to eliminate our constitutional republic.”
We’ve been waiting for impeachment to gain this level of traction for far too long, and now that the issue is gaining traction so fast, there is only one option… we must push and build on this momentum because the impeachment of Barack Obama may be at hand and it’s up to each and every one of us to make it happen.
Even The DNC Has Jumped On The Impeach Obama Bandwagon.
Well… sort of… Believe it or not, the DNC is so afraid that Obama may be impeached very soon, they’re actually raising money to stop it.
After listing a number of GOP notables who have gone on record as“supporting” impeachment, a panic-stricken email sent out to Obama for America supporters by the DNC issued the following call to action: “Remember, if we win just 17 more seats, we’ll take back the House, and put an end to this kind of asinine behavior.”
The folks at WND compiled a list of elected officials who are talking about impeachment: “Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa; Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas; Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas; Rep. Bill Flores, R-Texas; Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif.; Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.; Rep. Kerry Bentivolio, R-Mich.; Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas; Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla.; Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah; Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C.; Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.; Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas; Rep. Trey Radel, R-Fla.; and Rep. Ted Yoho, R-Fla.”
And the list is growing daily. Add Congressman Paul Brown (R-GA) who is well positioned to take the Senate seat that is being vacated by retiring Senator Saxby Chambliss and former Congressman Bob Barr (remember him… he was one of the men at the forefront of the Clinton impeachment) who is running and has an exceptionally good chance of returning to Congress very soon.
And here’s another respected voice:
“Quietly a tide is rising in favor of taking the necessary constitutional steps to remove the danger by impeaching and removing Obama and his cohorts from office. … Nothing stands in your way except the shackles of the mind that are, in the end, the most effective bonds of tyranny. … The answer is in our own hands.” -Dr. Alan Keyes
Bachmann is right. Keyes is right. In spite of what you are not hearing from the lame-stream media, removing Barack Obama from the office he usurped is finally gaining major traction in Washington D.C. and the one force that can make it happen is you. Removing Barack Obama is in your hands and your hands alone.
The Time To Impeach Barack Obama Is Upon Us… It Is Now!
And here is the message that we’re sending to our spineless GOP leaders and the 50 Tea Party members who presently serve in Congress. Remember, it only takes one to file Articles of Impeachment.
“With each passing day, increasing numbers of elected officials are finally starting to come to the inescapable conclusion that our great nation has run out of options and that the only solution to what is ailing this great country may well be the Impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama; and it’s well past time for the rest of you to get with the program.”
“Far too many maladies are eating away at the fabric of this great nation. A usurper has determined that the Constitution is nothing more than a worthless piece of paper and that he alone can decree which laws must be enforced and which laws need not be enforced. This usurper, in direct violation of the Constitution, changes laws as he sees fit and has repeatedly declared that Congress is irrelevant.
“What must Barack Obama do — how many offenses and derelictions of duty must he commit — before you begin to understand that removing Barack Obama from office will not bring about a Constitutional crisis because Barack Obama has already forced America into a Constitutional crisis, and that the people of this great nation can no longer tolerate Barack Obama’s subversion of the Constitution or his willful violations of his Oath of Office?
“Serious scandals such as; Benghazi-gate, IRS abuses of patriotic Americans, Fast and Furious, rampant voter fraud and the fraudulent implementation of ObamaCare have become festering sores on the body of this great nation; and yet, too many of you simply posture, pontificate and hold feckless hearings. The American people are continually told that the purpose of these hearings is to obtain ‘answers’ on why these aforementioned maladies are afflicting this great nation; but the American people don’t need ‘answers.’ The American people already have the “answers” and are demanding immediate action.
“The American people know that the affliction that is killing this nation, in all the above cases, is Barack Hussein Obama. He is the problem. He is a cancer that is attacking the body of this great nation and, for the good of the nation, the cancer must be removed. Draft Article of Impeachment against Barack Obama, and do it today. The American people are tired of waiting for you to act.”
Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
Barack Obama is a disease that is afflicting the United States and there is only one cure. The time is upon us to invoke that Constitutional remedy for what ails us… It is NOW
Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives.
If button above does not work, please use this hyperlink.
-IN CASE OF GOVERNMENT TYRANY-
“USE THE SECOND AMENDMENT”
“LA LIBERTAD NO ES GRATIS”
<IN GOD WE TRUST>
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño Editor.
Para contribuir con artículos, opiniones, sugerencias o recibir “En mi opinión”